Customer Reviews

Edge of Darkness [Blu-ray]

5 star:		(44)
4 star:		(46)
3 star:		(23)
2 star:		(16)
1 star:		(12)

 

 

"Edge of Darkness was a sensation when it first aired on British television in 1985. Aired on PBS in the United States, it was a dark, brooding thriller that seemed destined for a big-screen version that would be found lacking in ways big and small. However, Mel Gibson's 2010 version of the story still provides a lot of the sadness, bitterness, and intrigue with some changes that while they do necessarily improve the story, they don't damage it, either.

Gibson plays Tom Craven (played as Ron Craven by Bob Peck in the original), a widowed Boston Homicide detective eagerly awaiting the visit of his only child Emma, who works for a research facility, Northmoor. Soon into the visit, Craven sees that his daughter is very ill. Just as he is taking her to the hospital, she is shot and killed. Being a police officer, Craven immediately assumes that the bullet was meant for him, but upon investigating further, he soon learns that she was involved in the illegal entry of Northmoor by a protest group looking for evidence of wrongdoing by the corporation. A conspiracy begins to surround Craven that includes Northmoor, a US senator, and a shadowy government fixer named Jedburgh, played by Roy Winstone.

Gibson is always in his element in revenge thrillers, and Edge of Darkness is no exception. His tears, anger, rage, and righteous indignation strike the right notes at the right time, and he is ably supported by an excellent script and solid supporting cast. Again, a few details have been changed, but the general story remains bleak with perhaps a little more Hollywood hope and optimism added for good measure.

It's been seven years since Mel Gibson has appeared on the silver screen, and he definitely chose the right film as his comeback vehicle. While the conspiracy theories that make up the film aren't incredibly original, you are still treated to Gibson's strong screen presence and a tense storyline.

I'm unfamiliar with the British miniseries that this film was based on, so I'm basing my opinion solely on my thoughts of this movie in particular. A variety of mysterious characters prevent the film from being predictable, and you're thrown an interesting curveball from what the movie's trailer might lead you to assume about the story. I will also fess up that this was the first movie I've seen in years with a scene that made me jump in my seat (to the people in front of me, I apologize for getting popcorn on you).

One funny thing that I'll give kudos to director Martin Campbell for is not hiding the fact that Gibson is all of 5'9" in real life. Jay O. Sanders (playing fellow detective Whitehouse) towers over Mel in several scenes, a reminder that this film is a different beast than action flicks like Lethal Weapon or Mad Max.

I won't share the plot with you, because the less you know about the film in advance, the more you will enjoy it. For all of Gibson's controversies, one thing is undeniable, this is a solid comeback effort that deserves a watch.

"Edge of Darkness", directed by Martin Campbell, is a well made film. It has an engaging mystery, and characters that act realistically to what is presented. More so the actors, especially Mel Gibson, deliver fine, brooding work. Gibson, with his first film since "Signs" (eight years prior), doesn't skip a beat. While he certainly looks his age, he brings an intensely physical presence to the film. "Edge of Darkness" was based on a television series and because of that, the film can feel episodic during the middle. But that can be forgiven since the beginning and ending are both so tightly edited and Gibson is an incredibly relatable hero. "Edge of Darkness" is an unusually intelligent, decidedly adult, and ultimately satisfying thriller.

I don't really care about all of Mel Gibson's off-screen antics. As long as he keeps making good movies in front and behind the camera, I'll keep showing up. He hasn't acted in 8 years and his presence on screen is strong and captivating from the opening to the closing credits. He now sports a bald spot with pride, along with some major age lines running amok along his face. Very few actors can bring the raw intensity this guy possesses and still manage to show an emotional side, often with tears just waiting for release from his eyes. Ray Winstone has always been a fine actor and he's quite a force of nature on screen. He's very subtle and sometimes mumbles a little too much for me, but there's something about him that demands the viewer's attention. Danny Huston plays his typical slimebag self, but this may be his most vile role yet. I never saw the original BBC miniseries directed by the same guy, Casino Royale's Martin Campbell, so even though there were similarities to other films, this story was fresh to me. It went in two totally different directions that connect more and more as it goes along. You have the revenge portion and the corporate/government coverup. This almost could have been made into two seperate movies, but that's what makes Edge of Darkness a step up from the usual Death Wish type fare. It might be a little slow paced for those looking for something along the lines of Taken, but the realistic and often brutal action scenes will jolt you awake if you happen to be nodding off. Edge of Darkness is a nice welcome back vehicle for Gibson. The movie itself is somewhere in the middle of his body of work in terms of quality, but his performance speaks the need for this man to not only direct, but to be on the screen for all who are willing to see.

Thomas Craven, a single father, has been a Boston homicide detective for many years. His 24-year-old daughter Emma, his only child, is killed on the front steps of his home. At first it appears that Craven was the intended target. He soon uncovers evidence that leads him to think differently, and decides to pursue the information at all costs. He learns his daughter led a secret life that led to her murder. He quickly finds himself confronted with a shadowy world of corporate collusion with government-sanctioned murder. In the process he collides with a secret government operative, Darius Jedburgh, whose job is to clean up and hide any remaining evidence. Craven's singleness of purpose in finding answers about Emma's death becomes a transforming experience that changes his life.

Mel Gibson has not lost his touch. The script is smart and very well written. Mel Gibson is very intense and sincere in his role as both a grieving father and police detective who needed to uncover the truth. There are some great action scenes in this movie. I really enjoyed it. Mel is definitely back and in his element in this movie.

Mel Gibson plays Tom Craven, a Boston police detective in this brilliant (and topical) political thriller. This movie is like a sock turned inside out from the original BBC production. In the original, it's a British detective who solves the mystery of his daughter's death with the assistance of an American agent, played quite ably by Joe Don Baker. This one exhibits an American police officer and an emotionally complicated British agent (Ray Winstone).

Of the two, I find the Mel Gibson one to be much better. That probably shows my American bias, but the original was a 6 hour miniseries. I can't watch cricket either. I also encourage everyone to watch the original. The complicated relationship between Baker and Peck gives us a deeper insight into the human condition, asking the question "What is right?" Both characters have deep cultural bonds, and both carry out their actions for different reasons. One for simple revenge, the other becomes a dangerous idealist. The ending to the original is slightly different, much more poignant.

Both have similiarities in story line, though the American cop has many more action-oriented scenes than the original. Mel Gibson gives us a stunning and brilliant portrayal throughout the film. His Boston accent is perfect, and the supporting cast does a wonderful job, particularly the witty yet sparse banter between Gibson and Ray Winstone. Unlike the original, however, there's not much time to show how their relationship changes both of them, the American and the Brit, the agent and the policeman. I enjoyed the end scene with Ray Winstone. It's surprising. But both films offer wonderful scenes of the main character having conversations with his dead daughter, sometimes tender, sometimes conflicting.

I put this movie on the same level as almost all of Mel Gibson's work: well worth watching.

I've seen both versions of this terrific story about a police officier searching for the killers of his daughter and I have to admit the American version is superior in many ways to the BBC mini-series version despite a good performance by Ron Peck in the latter. Though both were directed by Martin Campbell (Goldeneye;Mask of Zorro), the Gibson version is tighter and more focused versus the slackness of the BBC series. Despite his absence from the screen for 8 yrs, Mel Gibson has matured into an even better screen actor than he previously was. Harrison Ford was considered as a first choice but in retrospect, he's a bit long in the tooth for this role and maybe a little too mellow to play the avenging angel that the character of Craven calls for. I doubt seriously that anyone in the Academy will vote for Gibson (because of his long ago meltdown) or for that matter, Michael Caine for "Harry Brown" but both films are political in nature masquerading as action revenge thrillers. They are both in a sense, "wake-up" calls to what's wrong with our society today.

Edge of Darkness is better than what the cover suggests - that stereotypical Dirty Harry gun pose. Showing no signs of rust, Mel Gibson is convincing, and as good as he's ever been. It feels like Gibson could shift into Clint Eastwood mode in the later part of his career, and exceed Harrison Ford with mature roles like these. The main fault of the film is that it isn't long enough and it gets a little maudlin at the end. Being an adaptation of a TV series - there's plenty of intrigue but not enough time to develop and resolve things. You sense a lot of material has been left out in keeping the movie on track as Mel's one man vendetta.

Now if Gibson could just behave off camera and keep his personal life and integrity intact - otherwise, it could be the last Mel Gibson film anyone would want to see for a while. Which would be a shame, given his talents.

well this weekend I saw two movies Taken and this I watched this first and it was pretty good. The story is about a cop named Tom Creaven (Gibson) who's daughter has been killed by a bullet meant for him or was it? In this suspensful movie you will find out the truth. Now while this movie is good there are a few bad things. One some of the dialouge could have been cut down. And I could barley understand the Engish guy lastly the story is a little hard to follow but you will get the main idea. So bottom Line if you like suspensful movies this is it and a good one.

Thomas Craven is a Boston cop. He has enemies. So when a gunman shows up at his door and kills his daughter, Craven automatically thinks they were gunning for him. But were they? Why was his daughter so sick? Why had she suddenly decided to come home? Why was she carrying a gun? And just what was her job at the Northmoor weapons manufacturing company?

Say what you want about the man; Mel Gibson, as an actor and director, is nearly unequaled. When he wants, he can sink his teeth into a role and never give up--and he wants to here. Gibson breathes life into Craven, making him a sympathetic, flawed hero. Ray Winstone, as a mysterious British special op, is also dynamite (as always). Danny Houston makes a great villain, even though he doesn't have much to work with.

And that is the main flaw of the film: it's forced at times, and this leads to a plot that just don't seem to make much sense (or make its audience care). I haven't seen the original miniseries; I'm guessing the problems here are condensing a longer, complicated plot into one 2-hour experience. It just doesn't always fit; this is far from William Monahan's best script, and it's certainly not Martin Campbell's best directing effort. Yet, the film IS a step or two above the usual thrillers of its type, mainly because of Gibson's bleak performance. It all leads up to an ending that is deplorable (I'm talking about the very last scene, not the ending in general), but the ride along the way is well-worth it. He's a cop with nothing to lose--so fasten your seat belt. (And the fact that the previous line doesn't come off as cheesy serves to show how worthwhile this film is.)