19 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A wonderful contirbution, November 17, 2004
This review is from: Edward Teller: The Real Dr. Strangelove (Hardcover)
A wonderful readable account, an essential addition to reading on the development of the Atomic bomb and American nuclear strategy. Teller went from being a `madman on the Mesa' to working on theories surrounding star wars, called by many to be the `real Dr. Strangelove' from the wonderful Peter Sellers film. This very readable account details Tellers life, from being a refugee to working alongside Oppenheimer and the rest of the Nuclear Bomb people at Los Alamos. Teller went on to be the main architect and driver behind nuclear bomb technology and strategic warfare aims, all the way to the early 80s. This is a fast paced biography with diagrams of the bombs and good explanations of the science involved as well as covering Tellers private life and social life.
The only missing point which would have been nice is more explanation of the Tellers theories regarding nuclear power and the utilization of nuclear weapons. Perhaps alongside the science it would have been nice to have more text devoted to the nuclear experimentation and this is the main part that makes the book seem to skip. One minute the reader is listening to lecture the next he is learning about Tellers family and then suddenly we are back in Alaska on a new test, with very little background from one scene to the next. Nevertheless the book remains the only and best book on Tellers life and detailing the American nuclear community as it matured in the 60s and 70s. A great contribution to the paucity of literature on this subject.
Seth J. Frantzman
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Teller, Meet Anti-Teller, August 19, 2005
This review is from: Edward Teller: The Real Dr. Strangelove (Hardcover)
In terms of pure cognitive exuberance, Teller is a hard act to follow. Reading this book on the heels of Teller's "Memoirs," I sometimes felt as if I were reading a condensed version of "Memoirs" (Goodchild quotes from it so heavily) into which someone had inserted occasional prosaic objections or asides--Rose Bethe remembers blah, blah, etc.
Which is another way of saying I found the first 300 pages redundant. At that point, with the discussion of testing in Amchitka, Goodchild's version of events differs so greatly from Teller's that I was appreciative of the divergent and perhaps corrective account.
The thematic heart of the book, the tragic hero's hubris, is interesting and deserved tighter focus. I found quotes like this one by George Cowan provacative: "People do betray themselves...potentially Edward was a great man in the highest sense, but he was betrayed by his obsession for power. Early on he was ambitious, which led to frustration, and then with success came the hubris and the power. And then he was lost. He made a mistake. He knows." But I never saw this adequately substantiated in what followed. Ultimately, I felt Goodchild presented the paradox of Teller but did not understand it.
Am I the only one who finds the title a bit cheap, a bit of a marketing ploy?
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
not a serious biography, June 21, 2006
This review is from: Edward Teller: The Real Dr. Strangelove (Hardcover)
This biography of Edward Teller, which I found to be disappointing, comes to us from Peter Goodchild, a documentary maker for the BBC.
After reading this book, I didn't feel that I had came to know Edward Teller, who was a very interesting, if controversial, man. I had learned a little about his origins, his academic achievements, his projects, and the controversies in which he was embroiled, but only rarely did I feel that Goodchild had really gotten to the bottom of what had happened. This book reads more like a Life magazine article or a description of a new wondersoap than like a work of history.
I disliked that Goodchild makes interesting points, but then doesn't provide sources to support them. An example: Goodchild quotes an American soldier to the effect that the US military knew and tolerated that top secret information about the work at Los Alamos was being flown to the Soviet Union by the planeload, and names the air field where this is said to have happened. This is a spectacular allegation, if true. Unfortunately the sources he offers to substantiate this claim were a Soviet code clerk who worked at the Soviet embassy in Ottawa, and an American soldier who sold his story at the height of the Red Scare. Both wrote books that needed spectacular stories to sell well. Neither the Venona decrypts nor the Mitrokhin archive, both of which have provided us with a good understanding of how the Soviets exported technology from Los Alamos allude to these clandestine flights. This is not to claim with certainty that these flights never happened, but rather to say that I feel that by not explaining why these claims didn't become common knowledge, Goodchild leaves his readers confused. Was there no FOIA or other source to substantiate these spectacular claims?
Teller was involved in Operation Chariot, a project to use H-bombs to dig a harbor that nobody wanted on Alaska's ice-bound northern coast. In the end the opposition of the indigenous population led to the operation being cancelled. The entire episode, which I think raises many questions about Teller's psychology and judgment, is more or less described in the sterile prose otherwise used to describe how to program a video recording device. I was also quite disappointed by his treatment of J. Robert Oppenheimer, about whom Goodchild makes so many subtle and sometimes unfair digs that his book seems to be more of a political tract than a serious biography.
As someone very interested by the era and its scientists, I was rather surprised that he omits John von Neuman from his "suspects list" of possible inspirations for Dr. Strangelove. There is a strong case for this: like Strangelove, von Neuman was wheelchair-bound, spoke German as a native speaker, consulted for the Rand Corporation, was an authority on game theory, and at times advocated a preemptive war against the Soviet Union.
A further annoyance is that Goodchild doesn't include footnotes, but rather has quotes for some sources at the back of the book. This is infuriating, as some of his ideas are interesting, and it is only when you flip to the back of the book that you learn whether this is or isn't one of the ideas for which he provides corroboration. This is one of the few books I have ever read that doesn't have a single positive review of itself on its back cover. To end this review on a positive note, it is one of the few biographies of Dr. Teller, so you may have to read it for what information it offers, and perhaps to use it as a doorstop. I anxiously await a book that does justice to Edward Teller's genius, life, and times.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
