Industrial-Sized Deals TextBTS15 Shop Women's Handbags Learn more nav_sap_plcc_6M_fly_beacon $5 Albums $5 Off Fire TV Stick Grocery Shop Popular Services gotS5 gotS5 gotS5  Amazon Echo Starting at $99 Kindle Voyage Metal Gear Solid 5 Shop Now STEM Toys & Games

Elementary Logic 2nd Edition

5 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0195014914
ISBN-10: 019501491X
Why is ISBN important?
ISBN
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy new
$59.53
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
List Price: $76.95 Save: $17.42 (23%)
15 New from $48.69
Qty:1
Elementary Logic has been added to your Cart
More Buying Choices
15 New from $48.69 27 Used from $5.29
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


InterDesign Brand Store Awareness Rent Textbooks
$59.53 FREE Shipping. Only 1 left in stock (more on the way). Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

Elementary Logic + Epistemology: An Anthology
Price for both: $125.89

Buy the selected items together

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Benson Mates is at University of California, Berkeley.

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE


Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 256 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press; 2nd edition (January 6, 1972)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 019501491X
  • ISBN-13: 978-0195014914
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 0.7 x 6.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #719,606 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 8 people found the following review helpful By Sam Adams on February 15, 2011
Format: Hardcover
The 1st edition of this was in 1964, the 2nd in 1972. Mates, a philosopher, is a very careful, exact, and clear writer. This is an admirable text as far as it goes, but it is not an introduction to logic for those with mathematical or metamathematical concerns. Although late in the book Mates discusses axiomatics and presents examples of axiomatic theories, and even provides a concise informative overview of the history of logic, his focus is on the meticulous set-up of the formal languages and the presentation of natural deduction techniques for theorem proving. It is the sort of text a philosophy department would use as an upper division introduction to logic, perhaps paired with Boolos and Jeffery's Computability and Logic. The corresponding math department text would be something like Enderton's A Mathematical Introduction to Logic paired with his recent Computability Theory: An Introduction to Recursion Theory. The computer science department would no doubt use something else entirely.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
10 of 13 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on January 25, 2001
Format: Hardcover
There are so many textbooks of logic. It's just one of them. And it seems that it becomes (or has already become) out of date. But it has still the virtues that the author promised in its introduction. If we expect strictness and rigidity in the field of logic, it's the best textbook of that kind.
It is mainly written from the point of the natural deduction, but it doesn't forget the axiomatic method. It first deals with the propositional logic, and second, the first-order logic. And it contains some features of metalogics and the brief history of logic. It shows all the range of the real "Elemetary Logic" as its title says.
It is a standard (too standard, it maybe the only fault it has) textbook of logic. Of course, it doesn't deal with the informal or inductive logic. You need another book on that. But if you read this book with "The Computability and Logic" by Boolos and Jefferey, you would have already entered deep in this field of the formal logic. It's a good start. Although too hard or standard for lots of student, it's worth trying for.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 5 people found the following review helpful By David Milliern on December 9, 2012
Format: Hardcover
Let me begin by saying that the basis of my review's perspective is one that assesses this text as a pedagogical tool. It was used in a graduate course in logic I took. The book has a major shortcoming, which simply boggles my mind, namely, that it seems to have been designed for someone who has some degree of knowledge of the material intended to be conveyed. By that I mean that the book is great for students reviewing the material, but, for students trying to learn the material, it is a nightmare and next to useless. The first thing that must be noted is that "Elementary Logic," as a title, is pretty misleading. (This was not a problem for me, because I knew the course I was taking and what, approximately, was expected.) The book is really a sprint through a primary on systems, but with an eye toward both natural language and mathematical logic. That is to say, the book is about metalogic, not so much "elementary logic." Being a technical book, I was absolutely astonished by the lack of rigor. Definitions are not clearly marked, propositions and properties in chapters have the same numberings as different ones from other chapters, and the sloppiness of how various ideas were stated (or presented) is abhorrent. The in suppositio formalis and in suppositio materialis (i.e. "use/mention" distinction) concepts were stressed in the early goings of the book, yet weren't treated with rigor when applicable, even in the chapter in which the notions were being discussed. As the book proceeds, it is as though Mates forgot about making the distinction clear at all. Again, this says to me that Mates is hoping everyone has the idea beforehand, because he certainly didn't maintain rigorous treatment, where applicable.Read more ›
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 6 people found the following review helpful By David Milliern on December 9, 2012
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Let me begin by saying that the basis of my review's perspective is one that assesses this text as a pedagogical tool. It was used in a graduate course in logic I took. The book has a major shortcoming, which simply boggles my mind, namely, that it seems to have been designed for someone who has some degree of knowledge of the material intended to be conveyed. By that I mean that the book is great for students reviewing the material, but, for students trying to learn the material, it is a nightmare and next to useless. The first thing that must be noted is that "Elementary Logic," as a title, is pretty misleading. (This was not a problem for me, because I knew the course I was taking and what, approximately, was expected.) The book is really a sprint through a primary on systems, but with an eye toward both natural language and mathematical logic. That is to say, the book is about metalogic, not so much "elementary logic." Being a technical book, I was absolutely astonished by the lack of rigor. Definitions are not clearly marked, propositions and properties in chapters have the same numberings as different ones from other chapters, and the sloppiness of how various ideas were stated (or presented) is abhorrent. The in suppositio formalis and in suppositio materialis (i.e. "use/mention" distinction) concepts were stressed in the early goings of the book, yet weren't treated with rigor when applicable, even in the chapter in which the notions were being discussed. As the book proceeds, it is as though Mates forgot about making the distinction clear at all. Again, this says to me that Mates is hoping everyone has the idea beforehand, because he certainly didn't maintain rigorous treatment, where applicable.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Set up an Amazon Giveaway

Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Learn more
Elementary Logic
This item: Elementary Logic
Price: $59.53
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?