53 of 58 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A biography of the young Elizabeth I for the new century, November 28, 2000
This review is from: Elizabeth: The Struggle for the Throne (Hardcover)
Starkey brings his expertise on the Tudor era for a new look at the young Elizabeth I from her birth through her coronation and the religious settlement that set the tone of her reign.
Most intrigingly, Starkey convincingly argues that Elizabeth had a relatively secure childhood, adored her father(and had good reason to), was not a helpless princess-in-waiting, but a great magnate in her own right by adulthood, with a sizable affinity, and probably did plot or condone her servants plotting against her sister, Mary I. These are just a few of the conclusions Starkey draws about Elizabeth, using surviving contempory documents and evidence.
There are a few flaws to the book: most noticeably, Starkey uses some modern slang and comparisions that may well yank the absorbed reader from Elizabeth and her world that he otherwise so throughly draws. Tudor history amateurs, like myself, will spot Starkey's incorrectly stating Anne Boleyn had dark auburn hair and other small details as disturbing. Also when discussing Elizabeth's Protestanism under her brother Edward and paying especial attention to the simple, modest wardrobe, Elizabeth adapted as a Protestant symbol of proper womanhood, Starkey does not point out how revolutionary such simple and plain dress was for royalty, who were expected historically to pile on rich fabrics and jewels as their right, but how much it saved Elizabeth in costs. Starkey also fails to mention that in the early years of her reign, Elizabeth continued to dress herself fairly understatedly(again saving money in the years England was rebuilding itself from debt to solvency). But this is an altogether reccomended biography for those unfamiliar with the early years of Elizabeth I.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
52 of 57 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good and Bad points, April 17, 2001
This review is from: Elizabeth: The Struggle for the Throne (Hardcover)
I very much admire Mr. Starkey's purpose in writing this book. He makes the case in the beginning of the book that much ado is made of Elizabeth's Gloriana years- the near-stereotypic years of Elizabeth in white face and huge ruff, draped and dripping in pearls. However, not as much information has been provided concerning her early development as a child, and really, as a human being. This exploration of the psychological development and its influence on later life does seem to be the new popular wave in biographies- "The People You Thought You Knew," and all that. I was very excited by the prospect of the additional detail and attention paid to this more-neglected period in Elizabeth's life.
Did he succeed- Well, yes. Sort of. If you've never read anything about Elizabeth, I can't say I really recommend this book as a starter- I think I'd start with another book- perhaps the books by Alison Weir? Her book on the children of Henry VIII covers much the same ground and other detail as this one, and she has another book focusing on the totality of Elizabeth's life. These may be a better initial orientation.
However, if you are familiar with Elizabeth's life- there is some new and interesting discussion in here- learning more about when famous paintings were painted, the history of clothing in those paintings, dispelling myths (or at least making an argument for dispelling them), and the re-interpretation of communications (Eg: When Elizabethe complains of being ill-used by her family, she probably didn't mean "family" in the modern sense of biological family (i.e., the Queen Mary), but instead the 1500's meaning of family, which referred to the staff and help who lived with her.)
There is some frustration in the support of assertions in the book. For example, Starkey will be making a point about a speech, discussing how important it is, or that it really set the stage for X to happen- and then- nothing, or perhaps very little information about the text of this important speech. I'd flip back and forth thinking maybe I missed it, but, alas... Perhaps I'm too used to sound-bites- this is possible. But frequently I was left with an impression of the importance of an event, without a good feel for the content.
The biggest problem with this book is the writing. For starters, the editing could be better- for example, on p. 218 the word "enjoy" is used instead of "envoy," unless "enjoy" is some British word for "diplomat" that I'm not familiar with (as a side note- we all make mistakes, but that's what editors are FOR if you have one!). More disturbing- the sentences are SO choppy, and it does interrupt the flow of the read. (p. 279, "Elizabeth and Cecil found themselves in a mess. And they had only themselves to blame. For they had hopelessly underestimated the effectiveness of the lords' resistance.")
Bottom line: if you've never read a book on Elizabeth, there are better places to start. This work really focuses on the first 25 years or so of her life. If you have read books on Elizabeth, this is a relatively quick read and makes some interesting arguments. But get ready. To read somewhat choppy sentences. Assuming that doesn't bother you. It's worth reading. But I want to set your expectations.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
44 of 50 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Good attempt but dissapointing in accuracy, January 3, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Elizabeth: The Struggle for the Throne (Hardcover)
I couldn't wait to read this book. When I finally got a copy, I settled down and read for many hours. I was disappointed in what I found. The dust jacket praises the book as "meticulously researched." If it was, then why on page 12-13 does the author find it a quirk of history that Henry VIII's love letters to Anne Boleyn wound up in the Vatican Library? Scholars of Anne Boleyn and Katherine of Aragon know that the letters got there during Henry's attempts at divorce - they were sent there by the Spanish faction to help persuade the Pope that Henry's real motives for a divorce were less than aboveboard. Reading further, I found more and more mistakes, such as the one about Anne Boleyn's hair color. In one instance he even confused two of Henry's wives (Anne Boleyn and Anne of Cleves, perhaps an editing mistake). I realize that it is a huge task to try and condense any history of Elizabeth into a short book (a little over 300 pages, my favorite book about Elizabeth is over 700 pages), but that does not excuse the mistakes.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No