|
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Crime Fiction With A Twist, April 14, 2002
Let's not beat around the bush: Bandits is flawed. But flawed in the same way that the Mona Lisa's smile is somehow not quite right, not quite natural. OK, let me back off a little. I'm not going to tell you that Bandits is high art, but it's quirky. In a good way.It's quirky because Elmore Leonard is stretching the boundaries of crime fiction here. All the Elmore Leonard basics are there - the girl, the ex-con, the heist, and that absolutely authentic dialog that perhaps more than anything else is Leonard's trademark. But underneath the skin Bandits is a psychological novel masquerading as a political statement masquerading as plot driven crime fiction. Or maybe more the mixed race love child of the three. Whatever it is, it's vintage Elmore Leonard, with a twist. The ex-con is Jack Delaney, former jewel thief, currently embarked on a new career as a funeral home assistant with his brother in law, at the persuasion of the parole system of the state of Louisiana. After three years Delaney's just not finding a whole lot of fulfillment in his new profession, and when he crosses paths with hot babe and former Sister of the order of Saint Francis of the Stigmata Lucy Nichols on a trip to pick up a body from the nearby church hospital, he starts getting antsy. The novel is set in the late 80's, during the period of the conflict between the Sandinista government and the contras, and Lucy's just back from a ten year stint ministering to the needs of lepers in a Nicaraguan hospital. She's not a nun anymore, but she doesn't know what she is instead yet. Part of her identity crisis evolves out of a little reality therapy administered to her while she was in country by contra Colonel Dagoberto Godovy, or Bertie as he likes to be called, who's in the US raising money from wealthy Republicans to fund the contras. It turns out that besides being an stereotypical short guy with a temper and an attitude problem, Bertie has a few other unreedeming social qualities, like a tendency to act out by chopping up lepers and pregnant women with a machete. The action revolves around Lucy and Jack's efforts to relieve the colonel of the warchest he's collected, and put it to better use than killing, maiming, and torturing innocent civilians so that they can be free of the scourge of communism. In the process they lead each other to unexpected discoveries about who and what they really are. There are a few weaknesses. The plot jerks around sometimes like a squirrel trying to get across the road, but it's always engaging. Leonard is also a little fanatical about dialog, so much so that he sometimes transitions between chapters with it in what stands out as being unwieldy amidst otherwise fairly seamless prose. And finally there's the ending. I won't go into details except to say that resolving one character's crisis at the end to my mind violated an honor that should have bound thieves. But as always Leonard delivers on solid entertainment, and the novel's other elements integrate it and give it a deeper authenticity.
|