Most Helpful Customer Reviews
42 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Fun Fictional Intro to Imperial Rome, August 31, 2010
"Empire" is Steven Saylor's highly anticipated follow up to his centuries-spanning historical fiction saga, "Roma". Both books trace the ancestral evolution of the Pinarii family as they bear witness to the foundation and growth of Rome and its Empire. "Roma" covered the earliest foundations of Rome through the civil wars, while "Empire" picks up at the end of the reign of Augustus in 14 A.D. through the reign of Hadrian in 141. Roman history is made up of fact, rumor, and myth, and Saylor hits on all of those elements in "Empire". Each of four chapters tells a discrete and self-contained story set during key moments in the real or mythological history of Rome involving both fictional and non-fictional characters and events. Saylor uses the Pinarii like stepping stones across a stream of time; each stone provides just enough footing to propel the reader onto the next rock of time. The chapters place a different Pinarii generation under the spotlight and provide enough drama to fill an entire book in itself. The chapters are highlight reels of their respective periods. In the early years, Saylor gives glimpses of Livia's evil which is very reminiscent of the Livia from "I, Claudius". He opens a window on Tiberius's sadistic hideaway on an island off the coast of Italy where he purportedly kept young boys for his own pleasure. The second chapter runs the gamut of Caligula's psychoses and Claudius' dramatically failed marriages. Readers also get a surprisingly poignant portrayal of Nero "fiddling" while Rome burns. In the third chapter, Saylor provides a historical discourse that includes the explosion of Mt. Vesuvius, the history of the development of the Flavian Amphitheater (known now as The Colosseum), and the rise and fall of the Flavian Emperors. In the final chapter, Saylor takes readers to the building of Trajan's column and the Pantheon and gives an all too brief glimpse of the philosopher-emperor Hadrian. The biggest frustration with "Empire" is the vastly inconsistent development of Saylor's primary characters. The Pinarii are like castles made with wet sand. Just as they gain a bit of definition, substance and depth, they either fall apart or are washed away. It's almost as if in trying to hit all events in a given era, none are enough of a focus to allow time for the solid development of members of the Pinarii clan. I felt very little emotional pull towards the members of the family, neither particularly liking nor disliking any of them. This void of raw human drama significantly reduces the cohesion of each generational chapter and no amount of historical activity is able to overcome that vacuum. The strongest character in the book is Emperor Nero whom Saylor paints as a subdued version of any Nathan Lane character. Nero ranges from sadistic to dramatic to regal to shockingly out-of-touch-with-reality. Though his end is predictably tragic, Nero and his era are the most interestingly interpreted. I have a bit of a bias towards Hadrian, but Saylor also did a fine job representing the erudite, introspective, and insecure monument-building Emperor. Saylor's dialogue often feels stilted, unnatural, and boring when used to provide historical background, whereas his integration of history and fiction works well while events are actually taking place. The most awkward moments come during a series of dialogues providing background on Rome during the reign of the Flavian Emperors. In some cases, Saylor uses this approach to set up future scenes; in others, it's as if he's trying to shoehorn in as much history as possible. Saylor doesn't go for the Hollywood endings when it comes to the Pinarii, and I enjoy his sense of tragedy. Without giving too much away, the Pinarii clan is admirably (yet naively) staunch in their loyalty to their Emperors and friends, and it's enjoyable to be spectator to the historical train-wreck of such an amazingly varied group of personalities and events. Each story is connected as one generation of Pinarii gives way to the next. An interesting device that Saylor uses is having one or more characters transition a new Pinarii generation from the old. Claudius carries over from the first chapter to the second. Several of Nero's inner clan are close with Titus Pinarius in Chapter 2 and remain close to Titus' son Lucius is Chapter 3. Emperor Trajan is the transitional character between Chapters 3 and 4. Saylor touches on a number of themes throughout his stories including freedom of speech and religion, human rights, philosophy, and other high- and low-lights of Roman culture. And while there's already a lot going on in this 600-page novel, cameo appearances of Rome's' historical luminaries like Suetonius, Apollodorus, Dio, Sejanus and many others make for nice surprises. "Empire" is a fun, light-weight introduction to Ancient Roman history. The writing style is smooth and simple, and Saylor hits on most of the major themes and incidents in each of the respective time periods. For those looking for a consumable introduction to and exploration of Roman history, "Empire" is a good starting point.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Disappointing, amateur sequel to the better Roma, October 18, 2010
This review is from: Empire: The Novel of Imperial Rome (Kindle Edition)
It's hard to conceive that this book was written by the same person as Roma. It is such an amateur work. Roma was far from the best book on the period and the writing and characterizations were not exceptional, but it was highly readable. This books feels like a high school effort. I learned absolutely nothing I hadn't read elsewhere about the period. But even assuming the person who read this was new to the period and did learn a little, the writing style and characters were so poor that it still would not be a great read. It's too bad too because there was so much potential for this post-Augustus period of Rome that doesn't get nearly the attention of the pre-Caesar and Caesar period. First, far too much of the story is doled out as unrealistically long exposition by the characters conversing with each other. Entire periods of history are covered this way with one sequence after another of characters sitting around at parties recalling events they often experienced first-hand but told as if they were lecturing small school children in history they had never heard. This is such a freshman writing mistake it is shocking it would come from such a seasoned author. There is no fathomable reason he couldn't have structured the story to actually have the characters in the action in real-time instead of just sipping wine and conversing on it. Second, and related to the first, almost nothing happens to these characters. With one exception, they are almost entirely observers of events and not meaningful players. Or if they are shown to contribute, it is usually of no consequence to their person or status. In Roma, there were frequent, and more typical of multi-generational epics, reversals of fortunes. From one generation to another the family went from prominence to slavery to, middle class, etc. Here the family seems to only slightly and gradually decline due to nothing more than the complete apathy of the lead characters, and despite improbable repeated run-ins with sociopathic emperors. I kept waiting for more dramatic reversals that never came. Third, as a result of the above issues, we really get so little perspective on the history and what happened during this period of Roman history which was constantly dramatically fraught with changes of reign and global expansion. Someone relying primarily of this story would walk away thinking that all the emperors after Augustus were preoccupied with nothing else but attractive young, usually castrated boys, with occasional building projects thrown in. This is vastly over-simplistic and, again, not indicative of the previous novel in the series. This is a huge missed opportunity to take the characters out of Rome and to the action all over the world as Rome ruled it in the time. It's staggering how limited and lacking in imagination this take on the period is. Finally, the dialogue and characters themselves are just so shallow and unrealistic. Right from the start we are introduced to our first generational protagonist as a man in his mid-twenties who comes across with all the maternity of a 12-year-old, which is not to say childish but ultra-naïve and innocent. By the time Caesar was that age he had already traveled the world, conquered pirates, held a sacred religious office and participated in the Senate, and this boy comes across as if he hasn't left the confines of his house for the first time in his life. Similar simplicity follows through-out, with dialogue that always strains of the overly simplistic. The only time the book remotely rose to the level of interesting was when it attempted to convey the various philosophies popular at the various periods it covered as its lead characters and their convenient friends grappled with them. That was mildly interesting. Overall, a major disappointment. I have to believe the author phoned this one in. Either his heart wasn't in it or his was distracted. Either way, not a work to be proud of.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
21 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A disappointment, September 10, 2010
This review is from: Empire: The Novel of Imperial Rome (Kindle Edition)
I am a big Steven Saylor fan. I have read and enjoyed his entire "Roma Sub Rosa" series, and I very much enjoyed "Roma," to which this piece, "Empire," is the sequel. Unfortunately, I found "Empire" to be a disappointment. The characterizations were flat and unconvincing, and there is very little by way of a plot here. The main theme is that most of Imperial Rome's emperors were morbidly bad rulers and in its way Imperial Rome was every bit as unstable as Republican Rome. This has the potential to be a great theme, but in my opinion Saylor misses his chance to harness this potential. There are long dreary passages about eunuchs, various types of gay love, etc., which can be entertaining and thematic in the right context, but Saylor fails to provide the context. (He does this with various degrees of greater success in some of his "Roma Sub Rosa" novels.) Here, these things are very much in the reader's face, and simply slow things down. About mid-way through the book they become an excruciating and intolerable distraction from what should have been the novel's main theme: life and politics in Imperial Rome. I desperately wanted to enjoy and like this novel, but in my opinion Saylor scores a clean miss with this one. It goes off the rails and never gets going. Not recommended. RJB.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
