The End of Roman Britain [Paperback]

Michael E. Jones (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: April 1998

Among the provinces long occupied by Rome, Britain retained the slightest imprint of the invading civilization. To explain why this was true, Jones offers a lucid and thorough analysis of the economic, social, military, and environmental problems that contributed to the failure of the Romans. Drawing on literary sources and on recent archaeological evidence, Jones disputes the theory that the Anglo-Saxon invasions were the determining agent in the failure of Romanitas.

Product Details

• Paperback: 336 pages
• Publisher: Cornell University Press (April 1998)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0801485304
• ISBN-13: 978-0801485305
• Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6.1 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #995,658 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

19 of 25 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars An excellent book, even if its main thesis misses, May 12, 1999

By 

P. Turner (Irmo, SC, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The End of Roman Britain (Paperback)

The great Classical historian Theodor Mommsen once said that Britain did not give up on Rome, but Rome gave up on Britain. Although Mommsen was technically correct in a legal or military sense, Jones would reverse this statement more generally, insisting that the Britons had expressly chosen to reject their Roman heritage. Jones correctly points out that the relatively small number of Anglo-Saxon immigrants could not by itself account for the collapse of Romanization in east Britain. He also does an excellent job of documenting the growing disenchantment of the Britons with the Roman Empire. Where he falters is in his failure to realize that the Britons were not unique in their disenchantment. Roman citizens throughout the west shared this attitude. Jones's discussion of St. Patrick exemplifies the flaw in his thesis: although born in Britain, Patrick spent his youth in Ireland, and was then educated and ordained in Gaul; many Patrician scholars, in fact, trace his special sense of mission to the influence of the contemporary Gallic Church. The reason why the British people today are divided between Celtic and Germanic nations (unlike their Romance cousins in France) lies not in a special failure of Roman civil institutions in Britain, but in the arrested development of the Christian Church in Britain; if more Briton-born Churchmen had St. Patrick's Gallic-learned dedication, the Britons might have earlier developed a national identity capable of surviving barbarian conquest, rather than having to wait for St. David in Wales and St. Kentigern in southwest Scotland. Jones's book is nonetheless well worth reading; although his main thesis misses, he does ably describe the sorry state of late Roman civil institutions in Britain (albeit correctly a microcosm, rather than a special case, in the west).