| |||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Holistic Approach is far reaching,
By david Anderson (USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Engineering and Product Development Management: The Holistic Approach (Hardcover)
I read this book over the past few months and felt compelled to write a review. The book is very important to me. I have been managing and directing engineering and product development for years and I am a strong and experienced engineer. I have managed some fairly complex and challenging projects for electronic device companies. I realize now that some of these projects and products, while successful, required a lot of energy and effort to carry through. I also realize that I have tended to see these projects as largely "engineer-centered" projects without the needed holism. Further, I now realize that it takes a very special individual to really lead a project. In my case, it was the president of my company who intervened and really made the difference in the process. I understood subconsciously what he was doing. However, it was not until I read the book that I realized how really complex the process was and how the "engineering-centered" view was a potential weak spot in the process. As part of the rejuvenation of our products, I launched the "new look" project as engineering manager. Early on, it was clear that the project had a lot of skepticism, factions, diverse opinions, and general resistance to change. As Stephen Armstrong suggests, change management is a very profound process to establish and maintain. He also implies that engineers may only focus on the linear and technical process and perhaps not grasp or control the other influences that can affect the success of true product development. In the case of Summit, the president joined the project team and participated actively in the meetings and the process because I think that he knew that this had to be a "holistic" process. This was critical because of the importance of the project to the company. Some team members at the meetings suggested that he was usurping my role as project leader. I was engineering manager and had assumed the role of "team leader" because traditionally product development was centered in engineering/R&D. What I experienced was a lot of resistance and resentment from other departments such as manufacturing, QA, and service. I realized that if the project were to succeed that I would need a strong mandate from the top and sustainable support from the corner office, along with much better teamwork. I did not resent the president's presence. Instead, I sensed that something good and interesting was happening. In retrospect, I now see that he (the president) wanted an integrated (holistic) solution and that there were forces and influences that only he could influence or control. The lesson to me was that thinking of the project only in a linear technical fashion, while important, was not the complete answer to getting things done in the needed time frame. The final project was not perfect in all respects. While we were able to keep development cost down, this did take more time because of the need to locate and coordinate contract resources and unexpected problems with certain key vendors. Also, we spent resources on a feature that was later decided to eliminate. Regardless, we did demonstrate to the marketplace that we had up-to-date technology and the commitment to support our products going forward. A couple of other items * The COO's time and availability became a problem because of business pressures. He did not abandon the project and appointed a second-in-command, a marketing director, to continue the day-to-day operations. The marketing director had sufficient communications skills, organizational clout, and the ability to stimulate teamwork that kept the process going. In fact, it was one of the best functioning teams because a workable process replaced the interdepartmental conflicts. The COO was and is a smart, demanding, and a really good leader. What he did was to address the product development process in the holistic manner that Stephen describes. At times, I felt that my role as engineering manager was being affected by the President's intervention. The president was careful to get my agreement and he made a point of sitting beside me at meetings to lend support. I realize now that I could not have pulled off the project by myself. The engineering process alone had been tried twice before and had failed to produce results. It was an uphill struggle with a lot of technical challenges along with the project challengers. The political, organizational, etc. issues were too large and beyond the scope of my control. I am a good manager in the engineering process but not in the league of the president. So the purpose of the article is to point out the revelation that I had during the project and especially when I read the book. Those who do not apply a holistic approach to product development are most likely old school executives/engineers (we've done it this way for 30 years) who are the blockers in the organization. The author describes in detail the tactics to deal with blockers. The blockers usually ignore the human issues and think a team is just a collection of people in a room.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent Book on PD Processes & Political Management,
By J Curry (UK) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Engineering and Product Development Management: The Holistic Approach (Hardcover)
The vision of engineering management presented by Stephen Armstrong is one that is both broad in its context and deep in its coverage. He offers the engineering project manager with a extensive set of management tools that, when used in total, will assure project success while improving overall project engineering effectiveness. Managers that employ this methodology will soon find this to be their indispensable desktop reference manual as the progress through the phases of product development.The demands on the modern engineering manager are greater than they have ever been and the challenges to program success continue to grow exponentially. The rapid growth of technology has resulted in most of the products being developed by current and future companies - large and small - being inordinately complex systems of integrated technologies. This complexity is exacerbated by the complicated interdependencies among the technologies of the various product components. The availability of highly capable e-design, e-analysis, and e-prototyping tools and the growth in new methods that better integrate design and manufacturing are both wonderful benefits and potential burdens to the engineering teams using them. The move to virtual prototyping changes the planning and staffing profiles from that of the traditional project engineering organization. Added to these changes are the increasing demands for shorter and shorter engineering span times accompanied with further expectation that engineering costs must be reduced by factors of 30% to 50% for businesses to remain competitive, and in some cases these reductions are expected to be recurring. These factors bring additional uncertainties and risk to an activity that has traditionally been risky. Given this backdrop, Stephen Armstrong urges us to view the engineering management problem from a different perspective than has been offered before. Engineering managers should adopt a total perspective of the problems that they have facing them. The managers that read this book will find the formula for the success of their projects. You will find as you read the pages of useful management methods that a pattern starts to unfold and the powerful concept of an integrated technical management will form. Your approach to successful engineering management will never be the same.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Engineering and Product Development Management,
By Gus Gillispie (Canada) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Engineering and Product Development Management: The Holistic Approach (Hardcover)
CAMC Book ReviewEngineering and Product Development Management: The Holistic Approach, Stephen C. Armstrong, PEng, CEng, FIMechE, CMC; Cambridge University Press:2001. (248 pages, plus 77 pages of appendices; US$55.00, available through "Books for Business" and elsewhere.) Reviewed by Gus Gillespie, P Eng, FCMC. One of the greatest challenges facing companies that develop, manufacture and sell complex products is bring their new offerings to market on time, on budget and as specified. In spite of its importance, and the great volume of material available on different aspects of the problem, there has been little practical guidance for managing the overall process. With this book, Stephen Armstrong has made a major contribution to closing this gap.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|