| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
40 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Biography, not science,
By "gearbert" (Cupertino, CA United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics (Hardcover)
If you buy this book hoping to get some insight into how entangled particles can be actually be created, what you can do with them and the truly bizarre and counterintuitive behavior that they exhibit, then this is NOT the book for you. On the other hand, if you're after a well-researched biography of the pioneers (and current players) in quantum physics, with personal backgrounds and amusing anecdotes, and running light on actual science, then Mr. Aczel has created a generally well-written account that you may enjoy. This book would probably be appreciated more by someone with an interest in physics but from perhaps a more "social" point of view. My problems with "Entanglement" stemmed mostly from Mr. Aczel's glossing over the actual science and experiments, and focusing on the experimenters, which left me feeling frustrated. When there are technical figures, they aren't well-described and sometimes it seems as though he's talking about things that aren't even in the figures, which I found confusing. But mostly he doesn't really manage to convey the sense of impossibility that begins to emerge in the lab as the physicists begin to design and perform experiments that Einstein thought could never be done. I've followed the work in entangled particles in the lay press (mostly Scientific American) and was hoping for something of about that level, but with the cohesiveness and richness that a book's-length format can provide. I was disappointed.
40 of 44 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
At the Edge of Physics and Philosophy,
By
This review is from: Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics (Hardcover)
This is a story about the search for a deeper understanding of what Quantum Mechanics really means. The book is tantalizing but a bit frustrating because we don't known what quantum theory actually means. I particularly appreciated the opportunity to get to know a little about the key players in this search, it adds a human touch and offers a feel for what it must be like to be at the frontiers of quantum theory research. Aczel skims the surface of the material because he must avoid plunging into the mathematics needed to fully appreciate the details. I suggest the reader have some previous experience reading and thinking about quantum theory ("The Cosmic Code" by H. Pagels is particularly recommended). Aczel spends the first half of his book with introductory material however in places this effort might need more elaboration for someone trying to enter this bizarre topic for the first time. This book is probably one of the very few places where a reader of popularizations in physics can explore the latest ramifications of quantum entanglement. Aczel spent considerable time interviewing the key physicists and probably got the science right. We recognize his total involvement with the content and appreciate the care with which the ideas are presented. I rated this book 5 stars because it was so thrilling and left me with a wish that I could be there with the investigators. This is an ongoing story and I didn't want it to end! It will certainly bend your brain and leave you wondering about what reality actually is! The bibliography is useful for anyone wishing to dig into the territory deeper.
15 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The Quantum Reality Einstein Could Not Suppose,
By
This review is from: Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics (Hardcover)
In 1935 Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky raised a serious criticism of quantum theory in the form of a paradox. The criticism meant that quantum theory brings about a "spooky action at distance" or "entanglement" between quantum subsystems. Two photons generated at a point with a correlation, for example, continue to have the correlation even after they are separated by a great distance, and a change in the state of one of them affects the other instantaneously. In 1964 John Bell proposed a mathematical theorem experimentally to test the existence of entanglement. Alain Aspect carried out such an experiment in 1982 to show that entanglement is a reality.Even one of the greatest physicists in history, Albert Einstein, could not suppose that entanglement would be a reality. So it must be quite difficult to make ordinary person understand it. Amir Aczel tried to do this difficult task in this book, but he does not seem to have well succeeded. Just half of a total of 20 chapters is spent to describe the history of quantum mechanics, though a short mention about entanglement appears at a few places. Thus the reader who learned quantum mechanics to some extent at least would find the first half of the book rather tedious. From the story of debate between Einstein and Bohr in chapter 11, the book becomes interesting. However, the author explains neither Bell's theorem nor the details of many experiments understandably. On the final page, the author reveals the reason of difficulty in understanding entanglement writing, "... the quantum theory does not tell us why things happen the way they do; why are the particles entangled?" Was our expectation to the author too big? A good point of the book is that it includes biographical descriptions of a lot of physicists related to quantum theory and entanglement. I have learned for the first time that Thomas Young, famous for the double slit experiment, was a child prodigy. Schrödinger's anecdotal "entanglement" with women are also told. A bad point is that writing and printing are made rather carelessly. For example, von Neumann's proof of the non-existence of hidden variable in quantum mechanics and John Bell's later challenge to Neumann's assumption are repeatedly described on pages 101 and 102. There are many typos, and especially the contents of pages 234 and 235 should be interchanged. This error, combined with sudden appearance of the description of Borromean rings on page 232, makes the reader confused around these pages.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|