| ||||||||||||
Thank you for offering to read and comment on the chapters of my new book on e-commerce. In the book, I shall be discussing various conceptual tools to help deal with the complexity of the Internet. One of these is a virtual cafe, where 48 of your special colleagues or contacts are present: sitting around the cafe at tables. The conceptualization is that you can go and sit with any of these contacts to have a discussion with them (by email), or invite a selected group of them to sit with you at a table for a group discussion (by email). In this way, the socializing aspects of a cafe can be simulated, even though the people in the virtual cafe are actually located in many different parts of the world. Sounds silly, but in fact this idea can help create some very interesting communication strategies. Since I'm covering this in the book I thought I might use it now to see how it works. I'll be describing it in more detail in the book, so I'll explain it here just enough for you to see how it is being used for this book review process. The cafe of reviewers starts with about 48 people. Most are people I've had correspondence with at various times on a variety of subjects, some I've contacted recently specifically to ask for help with this review. The 48 represent a very wide range of people - although in one way or another, each has some connection with e-commerce or digital communication technology. They come from all over the world. Some are well-known experts in their fields; some run large companies; some are students; some are teachers. There are programmers, designers, artists, writers, hackers and entrepreneurs. Some run servers, some host Web sites. There is an extraordinary mix of different people here, most of whom I've met through the writing of my previous books or on Internet discussion forums. I shall be randomly dividing the 48 people into six groups of seven to nine people (tables in the virtual cafe). So, when I send out the draft chapters, I shall be sending them separately to each group with the names and email addresses of all the people at the table in the 'To:' header. What I should like you to do, if you have any comments, is to send them not just to me but to all the people in your group. In other words this acts like a mini list serve where everyone is responsible for serving their own posts to their own small list of people at their table. It is as if you are making comments to a table full of people in a cafe. Unlike regular lists, these lists are temporary and last for two weeks only. For each new chapter there will be a random rearrangement of the tables so that the groups consist of a different mix of people each time. Not only might this random mixing of people generate some interesting discussion, it will give everyone a chance to meet a wide variety of very interesting people whom they might otherwise never have had an opportunity to meet. Of course, I have no idea whether this will work (although I've experimented with this technique already with some quite remarkable results). It is an experiment and I'll include the results (for better or for worse) in the book. I'm very curious to see how such an arrangement might generate different kinds of discussion. There is of course no obligation to comment. As in a real-life situation, some people just listen, others are prompted into discussion while others simply add a few apt remarks. I would appreciate, however, everyone adding at least some small comment on each chapter, so that I know they are keeping up and ready to receive the next. Thanks again for offering to take part and I hope I can provide you with some interesting and informative reading.
The first two chapters produced a variety of responses. Unlike conventional books, I hadn't specifically stated what was going to be in the book. I had a good idea what I wanted to be in it, but I couldn't know how it was going to turn out because I was going to let the feedback from the discussions determine the exact nature of the book. This upset a lot of the readers who wanted to see a conventional table of contents and the conclusions stated right at the beginning. I explained that I was looking at the book like a detective story: where we start with bloodstains on the carpet; find a body; discover clues; work out the motives - and then draw appropriate conclusions at the end to come up with the name of the murderer. Or, in this case, a viable way to think about e-commerce. My bloodstains on the carpet were the difficulties many large companies are having in making any progress in the world of e-commerce. It seemed as good a starting place as any because it is a mystery. Why are many large companies having difficulties? By the third chapter, the conclusion was drawn that the traditional structures and techniques of large corporations weren't suitable for e-commerce because it is not a stable environment. This requires a way of thinking that is quite foreign to most corporate trained managers and executives. The environment was likened to that of a complex dynamic system: a popular subject of current research, which can be described and analyzed in terms of chaos theory. This approach suggests dealing with complex environments by growing solutions rather than planning them. I lost a few of the review readers at this point because it seemed to them to be too esoteric. They couldn't see how it was possible to build a business without a structured plan that could be closely monitored and controlled. Those that did see the logic of growing a solution began to discuss the implications and the table discussions roared into life, with some people anticipating the contents of the next chapters even before I'd finished writing them. Up until this point, I'd been assigning the readers to tables randomly, but it became obvious that the range of different viewpoints was too wide for discussions to make any real progress without excessive disruptive discord. I began to group people at tables according to how they'd responded at previous tables. I put those who were appreciating the idea of growing solutions into groups together, separating them from those who were fixed upon the idea of having plans and managed teams. Some people weren't into the strategic aspect at all and were more concerned with technical detail; these I separated out to their own special table. I also had a table from hell: those who simply wanted to be critical and make no positive contribution to where the book was heading. To obtain the maximum of interaction, I used a rule that if there was no response from somebody over two chapters they were deemed to have left the cafe. This had the result of reducing the number in the cafe to only those who maintained a constant interest. This also put me under pressure to try to deliver interesting chapters otherwise I'd have ended up with an empty cafe before I'd finished the book. Altogether, the cafe produced more than 1,000 emails. A whole variety of views were put forward at each chapter. Some were critical, some helpful. The readers were adding information, introducing fresh ideas and viewpoints. I was quickly corrected when somebody disagreed with what I'd written and I was given numerable real-life examples to back up some of the theory. It was truly inspirational. Having feedback at each chapter while I was writing the next allowed me to fill in more detail where necessary, provide extra explanation, and most importantly be able to appear to anticipate readers' thoughts. The only problem was the wide diversity of people who were reading the chapters. Some were narrow niche technologists, others were not technologically oriented at all. This has resulted in many of the explanations being repeated in several different ways in order to cater for different types of people. The biggest problem was the explanation of the more abstract concepts.Chapters 6 and 7 were problematic as well, when I dealt with object-oriented thinking. Several of the readers dropped out at these chapters. Perhaps the most controversial area was explaining the idea of working without plans and letting solutions evolve. Some readers couldn't accept this at all. The problem was compounded when this approach exposed the weakness of using managed teams for the Internet side of an e-business operation. Even I was surprised at this outcome and it took an extra chapter of explanation to convince most people that this really was a rational approach. Bringing it all together for a conclusion was the biggest challenge. Until I reached that point I didn't even know myself how everything could be tied together. Happily, it produced just the kind of result I'd been looking for when I started the book: a simple conceptual framework that could be used as a basis to confront the complexity of the Web and provide a foundation for a competitive approach to e-business and e-commerce. Peter Small January 2000
The rapid advance of computers and communications technology is generating so many changes that the thinking of yesterday is likely to be irrelevant today. Those with the right mindset and understanding, together with the necessary conceptual tools, can ride this current wave of change successfully. Those able to realize that it is about strategy and communication rather than the technology alone will be able to run rings around the pure technologists. The environment is fast-moving, where early successes and innovations are richly rewarded.
Incomplete knowledge is a fact of life in e-business. No one can possibly have all the 'essential' knowledge in this unpredictable, changing environment. Game theory strategies allow for such 'knowledge gaps', using a type of thinking that is outside conventional business models. Solutions cannot be planned or designed in unpredictable competitive environments, they have to be grown from the bottom up. Success isn't about prediction and structural design, it is about being able to cope with the uncertainties and the complexities of this new medium better than others.
The Entrepreneurial Web is about understanding the implications of the Internet and the World Wide Web for business and commerce. It is about imaginative, people-to-people communication strategies that are likely to change all the rules for competing in highly competitive markets. It looks at how ideas should be allowed to evolve and respond to changes in order to succeed - something that many large corporate concerns have ignored - to their cost.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Stimulated excellent ideas!,
By Stacy E. Burrell "stacyburrell.blogspot.com" (Detroit, MI USA) - See all my reviews (VINE VOICE) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: The Entrepreneurial Web (Paperback)
This is one of the better books I have read on e-Business and Entrepreneurship. Two of the previous reviews lament the lack of practical ideas. However, the author states that this is not a "how-to" book, but a book on ideas. If your purpose is to find specific strategies and to be walked through the implementation, then you will be disappointed. If you are looking for new ways to think about business in order to create your own ideas, then the book will serve its purpose.Some key take aways were the concepts of growing solutions, cooperative game theory(which is validated in Coopetition), communication strategy and new venture probability. I am using the concept of growing solutions via listserves and virtual teams to create a strategy for a deregulated electric utility. In trying to start my own company, I have been stumped on how to get started. The author addresses this problem by using the Hilbert Space/Green Frog concept to get started, which is half the battle in itself. It's been said that the definition of an entrepreneur is a person who brings together resources. This book discusses ways to do this utilizing the Internet. The book is not without it's drawbacks. The reading tends to get bogged down as you get into the latter half of the book, though the author summarizes everything in the last chapter. Some of the explanations do get academic(Hilbert Space and Game Theory). Finally, better examples and cases would have been nice. Overall, the ideas sparked by this book was worth the price and the 5 star rating.
3.0 out of 5 stars
Promises, promises,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Entrepreneurial Web (Paperback)
I found this book disappointing and self regarding. Although promising to look at the 'new world', set aside from 'bricks and mortar', without concrete examples of his strategy, it remains wistful thinking. Connections and collaboration are fine - up to a point. When real money is involved one has to be much more certain of the pedigree of one's collaborators. I for one need a great deal more convincing.Until he has a successful business built upon his ideals, they remain ideals and should be regarded as fodder not fact.
2.0 out of 5 stars
Very clever, but how practical?,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Entrepreneurial Web (Paperback)
There is no doubt that Peter is a genius and a unique thinker in the digital age. However, this book requires some huge leaps of faith as it is based on unsubstantiated assumptions.One also has to question Peters credentials for writing this book - what is his relevant hands on experience? He is an academic, a great thinker, but with little experience. A great book if you are the sort of person who can ask why and question the assumptions, as you will be capable of sifting the dross from the gems (which are there!) To summarise, if you want your ideas deeply challenged, and want to discover new outlooks on the new economy, this is a great book. If you want to actually create a viable business, be prepared to take a leap of faith.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |