Most Helpful Customer Reviews
17 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A ten carat learning gem, August 22, 2006
This review is from: Enumerative Geometry and String Theory (Paperback)
Enumerative geometry can be viewed in the non-rigorous "classical" setting of the Italian geometers, in the rigorous modern setting of sheaf theory and algebraic geometry, or in the non-rigorous setting of high-energy physics and string theory. Modern mathematics insists upon rigorous formulation for all of its constructions, so it has appropriately rejected the Italian and physicist setting for enumerative geometry. But the move to put the results of the Italian geometers on a rigorous basis resulted in much of the current field of algebraic geometry, esoteric as it may be. A similar movement is now occurring in the attempt to make rigorous some highly interesting predictions in enumerative geometry coming from physics. This has proven to be a challenge, since anyone involved in it must understand not only the mathematics behind enumerative geometry but also the physics behind string theory. The author of this book is one of the few that does have this understanding, and he has passed on some of his insights in this short but illuminating book.
The main issue in the learning of advanced mathematics, particularly an esoteric subject like enumerative geometry, has centered on the proper method by which to motivate the central concepts. To better appreciate these concepts, it is better to present many examples of them, preferably in an historical context, and then illustrate the properties that these examples have in common. One can then show how the concepts arose from abstracting or generalizing over these concepts. The process then should be to present concrete examples preferably with diagrams and pictures, explain the historical reasons for the interest in these examples and the mathematical tools that were used for dealing with them, and finally present the current theories that subsume these examples.
The author follows this process to a large degree in this book, presenting for example the 'stable map' as being a generalization of the intersection of conics, and viewing projective space as the compactification of complex n-space by "adding a point at infinity". The book is based on a series of lectures that were directed to an audience of advanced undergraduates, so the author realizes that he must remain as concrete as possible initially. To explain Gromov-Witten theory, topological quantum field theory, and quantum cohomology to such an audience in a way that would make it understandable to them is a tremendous challenge. Without any assessment of his audience it is impossible to judge whether he succeeded in increasing their understanding, but no doubt they benefited greatly from the insights and examples at least as they are presented in this book. The author cautions the reader that the book is not self-contained, but given its size this is no surprise. If all the prerequisites were included this would swell the size of the book into many thousands of pages. The most pleasant feature of this book goes along with what was said above, namely that he motivates the subject of enumerative geometry from the "classical" viewpoint. Linear and quadratic equations are easily dealt with by the intended audience, who also has no difficulty in dealing with intersections of lines and conic sections.
Central to "classical" enumerative geometry is Bezout's theorem, which says that the number of points in the intersection of two plane curves is equal to the product of their degrees. The generalization of this theorem to varieties in projective n-space P(n) involves a generalization of the notion of degree, which for a k-dimensional variety is the number of points in its intersection with a (n-k)-dimensional linear subspace of P(n). Bezout's theorem in P(n) states that the number of points in the intersection of a collection of hypersurfaces is the product of their degrees. The author initially studies the case where these hypersurfaces are (smooth) conics in P(2), and asks for the number of conics that pass through four distinct points. To use Bezout's theorem to answer this question, one must compactify the space of smooth conics, which is done by realizing that the space of all conics is parametrized by P(5). However this strategy fails to get the right number of conics, as the author shows with a few examples, due to what he calls `excess intersection', i.e. there are more intersections than expected from what is predicted by Bezout's theorem. The excess intersection is familiar from classical differential geometry as an "osculating" or degenerate intersection, i.e. the dimension of the intersection of two curves in the plane is positive. In the area of differential topology this case is taken care of by imposing "transversality." The author shows however that intersection theory is subtler even for cases where the intersection is transversal. He illustrates this for the case of the intersection of two plane conics that have a line in common. This example also shows the power of line and vector bundles in enumerative geometry, and the accompanying notion of characteristic classes, such as Chern classes.
This leads the author to consider a different compactification of the space of smooth conics. This is the famous space of `stable maps', which the author motivates by considering first a construction that involves attaching pairs of P(1) together in a manner that does not introduce any cycles. This is called a `tree" and the no-cycle condition is imposed since otherwise one can have an algebraic curve that does not arise as a limit of curves isomorphic to P(1). A `morphism' from a tree to P(n) is then defined, with any parametrized rational curve being a morphism from the tree P(1) to P(n).
Readers familiar with the notion of 'transversal intersection' from differential topology and have worked with characteristic classes will understand fully the role that cohomology plays in "counting' the number of intersections of geometric objects. Loosely speaking, homology theory, and its dual, cohomology, can be viewed as "linear" theories since the "boundary of a boundary is zero" (and similarly the "coboundary of a coboundary is zero"). This is especially true in the context of de Rham cohomology, which the author briefly discusses but does not really use in the book. Thus when viewing the intersection of geometric objects from the standpoint of cohomology, one is looking at the intersection of linearized approximations to this object (the tangent or cotangent vector). The author introduces and uses a particular and very familiar notion of cohomology in this book, namely that of `singular cohomology', which is given a very rapid review. One can still speak of the transversal intersection of two submanifolds but in this case in terms of local coordinates instead of tangent spaces as in the case of differential topology. This intersection defines the `intersection product' in singular cohomology which for complex manifolds, which are the objects of interest in enumerative geometry, one counts the number of points in the singular cohomology class of the intersection. This whole project assumes that the cohomology of the manifold of which the submanifolds are a part is known. Once the submanifolds are characterized explicitly and their cohomology classes identified, their intersection products are calculated and then "integrated" over the entire manifold by using the "pairing" between cohomology and homology. The author shows how this goes through for the case of P(n) and how `cellular' homology and cohomology, another version of homology and cohomology theory, can be used in enumerative geometry. The author illustrates the utility of this version for the case of the `Grassmannian' of lines in P(3). It is in this discussion that the author introduces, via an example, the famous `Schubert calculus' in order to study the cellular cohomology of the Grassmannian. It was the goal of making the Schubert calculus, which dates from the nineteenth century, rigorous that drove much of the research in modern algebraic geometry. It is the `Schubert cycles' that allow the author to find the number of lines in P(3) that intersect four given lines. The Schubert cycles are the closures of the cells in the cellular decomposition of the Grassmannian.
It is the predictions from string theory that have motivated many researchers in enumerative geometry to look in more detail at this complex but fascinating branch of physics. For the typical mathematician, the learning of string theory can be a formidable project. The author attempts to make it somewhat more palatable by including a few chapters on physics in the book, these chapters being couched in the language of modern mathematics as much as possible. The reader will see the origin of the very controversial formula for the number of rational curves on a quintic threefold, and understand the role of the Gromov-Witten theory in giving this formula a rigorous foundation.
Fundamental to this discussion, as it was in the rest of the book and in the nineteenth century, is the role of projective space, it having the important properties of being compact and non-singular. It is also a complex manifold, an algebraic variety, and its homology and cohomology can be computed straightforwardly. The details of the Gromov-Witten theory can be formidable for both the mathematician who must deal with its motivation from string theory, and the physicist who must digest not only what a variety is but also a `stack', which is a kind of generalization of an algebraic variety. The author does not define rigorously what a stack is, but instead begins with a compact complex submanifold X of a projective space and considers the collection of n-pointed stable maps to X. This is a generalization of the notion of the stable map defined earlier in the book and maps a tree of rational curves with distinct "marked points"...
Read more ›
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
thoroughly enjoyable, but devoid of rigor, September 11, 2008
This review is from: Enumerative Geometry and String Theory (Paperback)
Katz's "Enumerative Geometry and String Theory" is to my knowledge a unique book, as it attempts to explain the recent and surprising connections between classical enumerative geometry and modern physics, 2 seemingly disparate fields. The intended audience were undergraduate mathematics students, who were likely to be unfamiliar with both the mathematics and physics involved, and the aim was to give them a taste of this rapidly evolving and exciting new field. Thus the goal was to provide motivation and an outline on how to go about learning all the vast material that study in this area requires, rather than actually teaching this material, or at least, that is how the book reads (perhaps the lectures were more informative).
Enumerative geometry is an area of mathematics originating in the 19th-century that seeks to answer questions such as "how many conics in the plane contain x number of distinct points and are tangent to y general lines?" The subject progressed by first rephrasing everything in the more general language of intersections of hypersurfaces in complex projective space (the author explains the reasons for these generalizations), then the problems were reduced to integrating certain cohomology classes over submanifolds, and finally formulas from string theory were derived to compute these integrals relatively easily, and this is more or less the order in which this material is presented in the book.
The first 3 chapters are devoted to describing enumerative geometry, using simple examples as motivation, first from the classical perspective and then in modern algebraic geometric terminology. Then, in order to define the integrals that will be necessary to connect this geometry to the physics, the author devotes the next 3-4 chapters to a "crash course" in point-set topology, smooth manifolds, differential forms, complex manifolds, singular homology and cohomology, group theory (just definitions), line bundles, vector bundles, Chern classes, and cellular cohomology (with some Riemannian geometry and calculus of variations thrown in in later chapters). As you can see, this is way too much material to cover in 50 pages or so, and the author doesn't really try to do much more than give definitions and examples and point the reader to the references. Chapter 4 contains 5 tiny proofs (a few lines each), whereas chapters 5 and 6 include about half a dozen theorems, none with complete proofs. For students who only know calculus and linear algebra, it's hard to see how they could absorb much of this.
The next few chapters return to enumerative geometry, utilizing the new tools presented in the preceding chapters to first calculate cohomology classes of various Grassmanians and then use these in solving the problems that have rephrased in terms of integrals of characteristic classes over moduli spaces of stable maps. The treatment is in thoroughly modern algebraic geometric terms, with references to intersection theory, orbifolds, and Gromov-Witten invariants, but not a lot is said about these things, with the GW invariants not even being defined until 60 pages later.
The next few chapters treat theoretical physics, starting with Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics (a subject generally first taught to senior undergraduates in physics), and rapidly progressing to graduate-level quantum field theory, supersymmetry, string theory, and topological quantum field theory (TQFT). Physical motivation (or explanation) is increasing absent as one traverses these chapters, with the final chapter, on TQFT, mirror symmetry, Calabi-Yau 3-folds, and quantum cohomology being particularly unmotivated. Formulas are presented without even a pretense at deriving them, and definitions are rarely precise. The final chapter explains how to practically calculate some of these quantities, which turn out to be the solutions to the geometric problems that are the focus of the book. For example, in what is the crowning achievement of this book, using formulas from physics that must be taken on faith here, the solution to the question "how many rational curves of degree n in 2-dimensional complex projective space pass through 3n - 1 general points?" can be worked out by the reader for all n, even though using standard algebraic geometric techniques the solution had only been found for n<5 after decades of work by numerous mathematicians.
As just explained, this book presents fascinating material, which would generally be considered inaccessible, to a wide audience. So few demands are placed on the reader, since so little of what is stated is actually being proved, that much of it can be read like a novel, especially if one has prior familiarity with some of the topics covered. On the other hand, for this reason the reader won't actually learn that much mathematics, let alone physics. The explanations of more advanced topics are generally poor, with definitions often lacking precision and proofs details, and there's a certain amount of sloppiness in formulas and calculations as well. There are exercises at the ends of chapters, where one is asked to calculate some quantity or derive some formula in the text, and these do help a little but don't compensate for the poor quality of the exposition. Read it for entertainment, but if you want to really learn something read the references, in particular, Quantum Field Theory, Supersymmetry, and Enumerative Geometry, which was from the same symposium and covers the same material except at a graduate level.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A nice book, December 17, 2007
This review is from: Enumerative Geometry and String Theory (Paperback)
This is a nice, informal, introduction to enumerative geometry and string theory. The first three chapters give a flavor of the former, indicating connections between algebra and geometry and motivating the use of complex numbers and projective spaces. The concrete question "How many lines in the plane pass through k fixed points and are tangent to 5-k fixed general lines?" is raised and answered here. Chapters 4-6 introduce standard tools of algebraic topology (general topology, manifolds, basic algebraic topology); more enumerative geometry, including an introduction to excess intersection theory, follows in Chapters 7-9. For example, the author introduces rudiments of Schubert calculus (intersection theory of cycles on Grassmannians) and uses it to determine the number of lines that lie on a typical quintic 3-fold in P^4. Chapters 10-13 concern physics, and the final chapter is meant to indicate relations between the two subjects.
The book certainly achieves its aim of giving a feeling for enumerative geometry and string theory, but I do not feel it indicates the connections between the two in a meaningful way; perhaps, this would be too much to expect from such a short book. Overall, the discussion is very geometric, though for some reason the author chooses to introduce vector bundles in a rather formal way. Another, minor, drawback of the book is that the author references entire books; more specific references would often be helpful.
The book would make a great text for a one-semester advanced undergraduate seminar, with each chapter taking up about a week for discussion. While graduate students (and beyond) are likely to be familiar with the material covered in Chapters 4-6, they will likely learn many new interesting things in the rest of the book, without putting in much effort.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|