0 items added

To add items, choose from the table below

Image is representative of the product family. Select individual products in the table below for more specific images and product specifications

Eppendorf Adapter, For 0.2mL PCR Tubes (Pack of 6)

Available in multiple versions

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $40.68
Product Specifications
Brand Name Eppendorf
UNSPSC Code 41121700

This Eppendorf adapter is for all fixed-angle rotors for PCR and reaction tubes. For use in Eppen... See more product details


Currently showing 1-2 of 2
Size Part Number
The Amazon Standard Item Number (ASIN) uniquely identifies the item in the Amazon catalog.
Price Quantity
   
For Rotor F-45-36-8 B005GRGDMQ
$40.68
For Rotor FA-45-30-11 B005GRGDLC
$40.68
Currently showing 1-2 of 2
Could not load your selection

We're sorry. An error occured when we tried to load your product family table. Rest assured, we're working to resolve the problem as soon as possible. Please refresh the page.


Product Features

  • Adapter is autoclavable (121 degrees C, 20 minutes)
  • For use in Eppendorf Minispin and Minispin plus microcentrifuges

Product Details

  • Shipping Information: View shipping rates and policies
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • ASIN: B0078TGHTO
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Manufacturer’s warranty can be requested from customer service. Click here to make a request to customer service.

Product Description

This Eppendorf adapter is for all fixed-angle rotors for PCR and reaction tubes. For use in Eppendorf centrifuges. Adapter is autoclavable

Customer Reviews

5 star
100%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

This product has undergone extensive research on my end, I’m decently happy.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse