Epson Perfection 3590 Photo Scanner

by Epson

Product Details

• Item Weight: 7 pounds
• Shipping Weight: 13 pounds
• Shipping: Currently, item can be shipped only within the U.S. and to APO/FPO addresses. For APO/FPO shipments, please check with the manufacturer regarding warranty and support issues.
• ASIN: B000ALESJ8
• Item model number: B11B177091
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
  • #91 in Electronics > Camera & Photo > Printers & Scanners
• Date first available at Amazon.com: June 6, 2007

Product Description

Automatic scanning of photos, film, or text. Uses 3200 x 6400 dpi resolution for enlargements up to 8 x 10. Scan multiple strips of 35mm negatives with built-in Auto Film Loader. Restore images immediately with Epson Easy Photo fix. Built-in auto film loader. 3200 x 6400 dpi. 48-bit color. Operating System Compatibility: PC/Mac; Scan Size (W x H): NA; Bit Depth of Color: 48-bit;Buttons: NA.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

132 of 133 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Good results with old B&W negatives, September 15, 2005

By 

InTents - See all my reviews

This review is from: Epson Perfection 3590 Photo Scanner (Office Product)

I've been searching for a way to scan my collection of old b&w negatives, and this inexpensive scanner is giving me the best results I've been able to get so far. I've owned an expensive Nikon film scanner, an inexpensive Minolta film scanner, and an older Epson 1640SU flatbed. The film scanners were best for color, but they always gave me unattractive results with B&W negatives. I don't know what it was, but the "look" was always just wrong and unpleasant. This Epson 3590, on the other hand, effortlessly produces images that are just pleasing to look at. They look like photographs, not digital oddities. Kudos, Epson!
******
I thought I'd add a little to my earlier review now that I'm a couple of thousand scans into this thing. As I noted in my first review, I am using this Epson 3590 mostly to scan some 1970's B&W 35mm negs. I like the results I am getting. Focus is good, it doesn't blow out the highlights or lose the shadows, and it doesn't "see" too many imperfections in the negatives. The results are pleasing to the eye. Now, about this auto film feeder gizmo, which is one of the reasons I bought it. It generally works as advertised and makes this scanner unusually productive. Sometimes it guesses wrong about the frame edges, but it gets it right 95% of the time. Also important to note is that the feed mechanism *will* get gummed up if you use it a lot. Even though I have taken good care of my negs over the years, the feed guides will eventually collect a sticky goo that will bring your scanning to a screeching halt. I have had to become an expert at dismantling and cleaning the auto-feeder, and so will you if you use it as heavily as I have. Good news: it disassembles and reassembles very easily, not that Epson wants you to do so. To conclude, if you have a ton of negatives to scan and want to blast through them without futzing around with film holders, give this scanner a try. Amazon has even lowered the price by $20 since I bought it.

41 of 41 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Another perfect Epson Perfection scanner., August 25, 2006

By 

Steven A. Godun "sgodun" (North Brunswick, NJ) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Epson Perfection 3590 Photo Scanner (Office Product)

This is the second Epson Perfection scanner I've purchased for myself and about the 15th one I've bought overall. I've never had a bad experience with Epson scanners and this one is no exception.

The scanner software (under OS X) is quite nice and there's even an Intel-native version for those of you with Intel Macs. The software includes a Photoshop plug-in that works with all OS X-native versions of Photoshop, as well as the venerable "Epson Scan" stand-alone software. The interface for both systems is identical; the only real difference is the Epson Scan app does a scan-and-save for each job, while the Photoshop plug-in gives you multiple new/untitled documents.

Color quality and consistency is very good for a scanner in this price range. The software-based descreen is actually quite excellent, allowing you to scan printed images without that nasty moire pattern. There's also a "color restoration" feature which works best on really old photographs (lightly-faded pictures don't turn out as well, but heavily faded ones turn out great). One particularly nice feature is the ability to gang up pictures on the scanner glass and scan them "all at once" into individual files.

This scanner comes with a built-in transparency scanner which makes scanning all sorts of film-based images (slides, chromes, etc) very easy. The slide adapter stores in the lid, which is a tidy little touch. I successfully scanned nearly 150 slides that were upwards of 50 years old and they came out quite good.

Unique to this scanner is an integrated motorized 35mm film scanner. A small spring-loaded trap door at the top of the lid opens up to reveal a slot where you feed your 35mm film. (According to Epson your film strip needs to be at least three frames long to correctly feed, but I've successfully gotten two frames without a problem.) Insert the film, run the scan software, and it will automatically scan each frame as its own file. The door closes again when you're finished to maintain the sleek outward appearance of the scanner.

I also purchased the photo feeder for this scanner which replaces the lid of this scanner, and gives you the ability to automatically batch scan up to about 25 photos or business cards. This is also entirely automated; insert the stack, run the scan software, and it will automatically scan each photo/card as its own file. One minor complaint: Occasionally, particularly when scanning a photograph where the top half is very light and the bottom half is very dark, the software will only scan the light part of the photo. Oddly enough, I found that if I rotate the photo 180 degrees and put it back in the feeder, the scanner seems to have no problem scanning it. Apparently the lighter half has to be fed first.

I have only two small complaints with this scanner but I'm not penalizing Epson for this as I've seen this same problem with virtually every other scanner on the market. Complaint #1 is, if you are scanning things that have dark backgrounds, the scanner will often not be able to detect the edges of the photo (or slide, or 35mm film frame, etc). This isn't horrible, really; it only means that you have to manually marquee the image area, a mild annoyance at best when you consider how much automation the scanner does otherwise. The second complaint has to do with the lid. It is not spring-loaded so you have to be very careful when lowering it so it doesn't accidentally slam into the base. Again, I haven't seen a scanner in this price range which has this feature (Epson's higher-end and more expensive scanners do) so I'm not particularly penalizing Epson over it.

33 of 33 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Made the impossible.....possible, July 12, 2006

By 

J. Eklund "I spend too much time on research...." (Cape Cod, MA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Epson Perfection 3590 Photo Scanner (Office Product)

Much like a previous reviewer, I am trying to put a lifetime of photos onto a DVD for an 80th birthday party (my grandmother). I have a Canon MP730 All In One, and thought that I could do the project with that. After about 30 photos taking me 3-4 hours, I gave up. I started looking for a professional place to do these, and they wanted between $1.50 and $4.00 a photo. I looked around and found the Epson 3490 scanner and Epson Photo Feeder. I bought both and have scanned in almost 700 pictures in the last 5 days with it- all while doing other things! I haven't even really needed to try all that hard.

With the feeder, I can stack about 25 like-sized photos in, and let it rip while I go do whatever. The photos that won't go through the feeder get put on the glass, 4 at a time, and it does the rest. I don't need to rotate pictures, crop, nothing. I just recognizes where the pictures are, lines it up, scans it, and you're done. It's an amazing little scanner. With the photo feeder, it's a LIFESAVER!

Anyway, when I bought this I was thinking a scanner for less than $150 was bottom-end. It may be, I don't know- since I'm not a professional photographer or anything, but I'm impressed. The resolution on this is so clear that the scanner even picked up textures in the paper that the photo was printed on, like dots in the background, that you can't see with your eyes. Not a problem though- it made all of the photos look great! Unless the photo was damaged beyond repair, it made quick and perfect work of everything. If this is bottom line though, I hate to see what mid-range or top-line is. I think this is a STEAL for the money.

If you need to scan in a ton of photos, or want decent quality and speed, buy this now!