Customer Reviews


551 Reviews
5 star:
 (103)
4 star:
 (86)
3 star:
 (89)
2 star:
 (96)
1 star:
 (177)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


20 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars It wasn't cinematic genius, but sure made me feel like a kid again!
Eragon is a farm boy from a small town where life is simple, until one day he happens upon his destiny. While out hunting he comes across something which he mistakes for a stone, but is really an egg that hatches...a dragon. He then learns that he didn't find the egg, but rather the egg found him. A dragon will not hatch until it comes into the hands of the person it has...
Published on March 21, 2007 by Peter Shermeta

versus
247 of 282 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars This could have been a masterpiece.
Honestly, I wanted to cry as I sat there in the theater watching this movie. What a waste of ten bucks. If you have read the books, and excitedly waited out the release of the movie, you are undoubtably as disappointed as I am. The books had such scope, like a Lord of the Rings junior. There was no way to get everything important shoved into an hour and a half movie. Why...
Published on March 14, 2007 by S. Ulrich


‹ Previous | 1 256| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

247 of 282 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars This could have been a masterpiece., March 14, 2007
This review is from: Eragon (Two-Disc Special Edition) (DVD)
Honestly, I wanted to cry as I sat there in the theater watching this movie. What a waste of ten bucks. If you have read the books, and excitedly waited out the release of the movie, you are undoubtably as disappointed as I am. The books had such scope, like a Lord of the Rings junior. There was no way to get everything important shoved into an hour and a half movie. Why not go ahead and make a 2 and a half hour epic? I'd have watched it!!
Here is what you'll miss in the movie:
-The relationship between Brom and Eragon is very underdeveloped, so much so that when Brom dies, you're like, whoopdeedoo.
-Saphira ages from a tiny dragon into just about full grown in one ridiculous moment.
-Eragon's journey with Murtagh is like, 5 seconds long. No Hadrac desert, no bonding. Again, you could care less about Murtagh in the movie.
-The Dwarven kingdom was UNBELIEVABLY disappointing. If you read the book, you probably had quite a vision workded up in your head, with the Star Rose and all. The movie pretty much annihilates all that. And the dwarves themselves are stupid-looking. You can't slap some armor on a guy with a beard and call them a dwarf.
-Arya is an ELF. Did they really go over on the budget that they couldn't even give her POINTED EARS???
-The battle between Eragon and the Shade is like nothing. I was so bored.

Over all, this movie takes a perfectly paced book and puts it into hyperdrive, taking all the wonder and fun right out of it. You'll sit down to watch this movie and all you'll be able to do is watch in horror as they slaughter it. It is a terrible shame. Had they had a larger CGI budget, blatantly copied some LOTR stuff, and had Mr. Paolini perhaps overseen the novel-to-script process, well, maybe he did, but they just shoved some more money at him and he said, "Whatever, I'm alright with you destroying my cool book. Go for it."

Now, if I were to choose one or two things from the movie that didn't totally and completely suck, I will say this:
Saphira, for the amount of CGI that was spent on her, is perfect. She was totally real. The voice of Rachel Weisz is perfect as well. Eragon, Edward Speelers, he was great too. Too bad he had to over-act in order to compensate for the crappy, crappy dialogue and lack of character development.

If they happen to make a sequel, Lord help us. The second book is even more complex and wide-scoped than the first. It will not translate well based on it's predecessor. I say they scrap the first movie, and make it all over, with a bigger budget, and the fans of the book get all editing priveledges. Then we'd have our Eragon come to life, rather than this horrible, mess of a mutilated movie!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


29 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Star Wars meets Dragonheart, December 27, 2006
I am the only member of my family who didn't read the books. That said, we all saw Eragon the movie together. It was noted beforehand that I alone had no expectations. The rest of this review is a spoiler, so proceed at your own risk.

I'm sorry to report that none of us enjoyed the movie. It was all about the animation. The story was recycled. The dialogue was inane. They repeated one line at least three times, and I'm told it was never in the books..."One part brave, three parts fool."

This project had the depth and imagination of Ralph Bakshi's "Lord of the Rings", meaning not much. My family (the Eragon fans) were intensely disappointed, outraged and offended. They said it was like taking a novel and condensing it to a four-frame comic strip. I wonder what the author, Christopher Paolini thought? There is mention of elves and dwarves, but you never see them...or so I thought. I was told afterward that the female lead character, Arya, was an elf. The movie never revealed that. At the end, I thought she was Minnehaha the Indian princess.

Personally, I did not hate Eragon as much as the others in my family, but I would not recommend it. I thought that as presented, this movie was a bold-faced rip-off of Star Wars; the king is a dragon-rider who turned against his brethren to gain ultimate power...there is a secret encampment of rebels, waiting for a leader to appear...that leader has no idea he is the chosen, or why...the hero's adoptive family is slain in the search for him by the evil king...the hero's mentor is slain by the evil king's more evil minion. Sound familiar? On and on it goes, a regurgitation of the same old thing. Even the dragons are reminiscent of the worms in Dragonheart and Dragonslayer, nothing innovative.

The computer graphics are very good, but that's about all you'll get in this offering. Given that, even the best of the CGs will remind you of Lord Of The Rings, but not as good.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


99 of 125 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Crashes and burns, February 21, 2007
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Eragon (Two-Disc Special Edition) (DVD)
"Eragon" wants to be "Lord of the Rings." It really, really wants to be. In a pinch, it'll settle for "The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe" with a dash of Harry Potter.

But those hoping for a spectacular PG-rated epic shouldn't hold their breaths, because the adaptation of Christopher Paolini's bestseller is a massive bellyflop. The direction is stilted and plodding, the acting is on par with tree stumps, and the whole thing is uninspired -- it never moves beyond "quick cash-in."

A young woman is being chased through the woods by a band of evil soldiers, trying to recapture a bright blue stone she stole from evil King Galbatorix (John Malkovich), but she magics it away. It's found in the woods by a young farm boy, Eragon (Edward Speleers), who unsuccessfully tries to trade it for food. But the stone turns out to be a dragon's egg.

When his home and uncle are destroyed, Eragon escapes with his now-grown dragon Saphira (Rachael Weisz) and a mysterious stranger named Brom (Jeremy Irons), who knows a lot about the Dragon Riders. Now Eragon and Saphira may be the only hope for the land, not to mention the captive elf princess he's dreaming about, and whom he has to rescue from the evil king.

Dragons, damsels in distress, magic spells, an evil king and his evil wizard, and a Young Hero in the Luke Skywalker mold... well, "Eragon" had a lot of obstacles in front of it from the start. It sounds like the love child of "Star Wars" and "Lord of the Rings"... except it's infinitely more clumsy than either of those movies.

And the director doesn't help -- Stefan Fangmeier is horribly crude and clumsy in his directing, with a style that manages to be both stilted and choppy. The scripting is even worse. Expect the most pompous, cliched fantasyspeak imaginable ("It is your fate to be a Dragon Rider. The Varden need a Rider if they are to defeat Durza and the king." "I didn't ask for any of this!" "But you were chosen, nevertheless!").

It's not surprising, since Fangmeier has never even directed a short film before. His only prior movie work has been for visual effects, which might explain why the CGI for Saphira the dragon is so beautifully detailed and fluid. Wonderful work there. But not enough to make you forget the rest of the movie.

Speleers looks like a deer in the headlights, while Sienna Guillory has all the elegance and magic of hobbit feet, and Malkovich is given the most 2-D villain role of the 21st century. The supporting actors give the only solid performances, miscast as they are -- Weisz gives a wonderfully nuanced performance, while Irons is solid as the mentor figure.

"Eragon" has the occasional good performance or moment of excellence -- usually from Weisz as Saphira. But the rest of the time, it's an amateurish example of how NOT to make a fantasy movie.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Star Wars! Erm, I mean...Eragon!, January 5, 2007
By 
Kevin Ryan (Ithaca, NY USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Have you ever wondered what Star Wars would be like as a Fantasy movie? Go see Eragon.

We've got Eragon (Luke Skywalker) who lives with his uncle (Uncle Owen). His friend Roran (Biggs) leaves to go on an adventure and Luke, I mean Eragon, is left all alone on the farm on Tatooine, I mean, random farm village. There's even a scene where he watches forlornly as the sun sets, though, unlike Tatooine, there's only one sun. Now Eragon finds a dragon egg and learns the way of the force, I mean magic, from Brom (Obi Wan) who happens to live in the same village. Together they set off and have to save the princess (Leia) from being killed by the evil King's (Palpatine) right hand man, Darth Va - I mean Durza. Now they have to find the Rebel Base and protect it from the Death Star before it's too late! Well, they do go to the Rebel Base but instead of the Death Star we have the forces of Mordor attacking. Good thing Luke and Leia are there to save the day!

Besides the severely unoriginal storyline serving huge helpings of both Lord of the Rings and Star Wars, the movie is just awful. There is no sense of distance or time - characters seem to travel across the continent in a matter of minutes or hours. We have no idea how many days pass (if any) and from the looks of things the entire evil army is able to march to the rebel stronghold in a day - the same for Jeremy Irons and his remarkable ability to show up halfway across the world in a few hours. How could this movie have passed screening tests? The good Varden people have waited 1000 years for Eragon and his Dragon who can't seem to hold three people even though a horse can hold two? How about the fact that Eragon just happens to know new spells at convenient times with no prior knowledge? How about the fact that we don't care about the Varden because they are just people in shiny outfits to the viewers?

The only good thing about this movie is seamless visual effects when Eragon rides Saphira, and even that won't get me to purchase it on DVD.

Kevin's Review: D-
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars Two Thumbs Down, December 17, 2006
Eragon- While the actors and special effects were excellent, I couldn't get over the story line. I read and liked the book. They skipped and completely left the story line in the movie so often it was hard to keep up. If I were Chris Paolini I would be furious at how they butchered my story. The dumbest part was when Saphira was first learning to fly. She took off a baby dragon and came back full grown. This book's story was destroyed in the theater. Maybe my expectations were too high as I went to see the movie looking for Lord of the Rings quality and I got a USA up all night with Joe Bob Briggs movie. Had they made this movie 3 1/2 hours long and stayed with the story line it would have rivaled Lord of the Rings. As it is we may never see Eldest in theaters.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Somebody wanna tell me what just happened here?, May 25, 2007
This review is from: Eragon (Two-Disc Special Edition) (DVD)
Well lets begin with flaws shall we, seeing as there was nothing but flaws throughout the entirety of the film. First off, did anyone notice that when the camera was looking down on Eragon and Roran that Eragon was wearing blue jeans? Yes. Blue Jeans. Also, how about the death of Garrow? Eragon's quick change of heart went something along the lines of this: " Oh my god he's dead!"
Brom, "Just burn the old man and lets go!"
Eragon, "Okay. I don't really know you but lets go run away together!"
Ya.....exactly.....Lots of depth here. Lots.....Throughout the rest of the movie his weapons change constantly. He'll be carrying one bow and the next second it's not there and then all of a sudden he's carrying a completely different bow. His sword will disappear and reappear just as frequently. Setting all of that aside, was Arya even an elf in this movie?
I didn't see any pointy ears. Also, why did she look like she was giving birth when she was being tortured?
The Urgals looked like dum human brutes. Don't even get me started about Durzas' giant moth...thing....
Half the main and more interesting characters were left out or botched. Angela the old herbalist was some kind of large 18 year old girl w/ a nose ring and a thing for our great hero. All in all this movie was probably the most horrible peace of film I have ever seen. I lost a whole hour and a half of my life that I can never get back. If you are thinking of buying this, DON'T for the love of god.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Wow, I just saw this movie., December 29, 2006
By 
Wesley Davis "stellgod" (Chatsworth, Georgia United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
I'm not going to say much that hasn't already been stated before. This is a good movie...for a child between the ages of 8-13. Even then, my 9 year old brother said it was stupid. This movie is bad. The book was average but the movie is just bad. I will never compare it to LOTR or Star Wars because those are amazing movies. I have heard people here mention the CGs being "par" with LOTR. Please do not insult LOTR that way. The CGs are on "par" with the movie's terrible acting. I found the characters completely unbelievable and uninspiring. There is very little plot in this movie, and it is very rushed. Yes, I know this is a 2 hour movie, but come on. There is absolutely no depth to the movie. That's all I can say
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars How Disappointing!!!, December 27, 2006
I have been counting down the days to this movie. I haven't been this excited to see a movie in a long time. How sad I was when the movie was over. Not because it ended but because how much they marred it from the book. I really loved the book and I understand that the movie will cut bits from the book to squeeze it all in but what was the reasoning for making it totally different??? It left out so many important issues, people and places. I do not see how they can make a second movie when they totally screwed up the first. I gave it two stars because my kids (who didn't read the book) did enjoy the movie.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars So Disappointed, December 19, 2006
By 
Ethony* (Perth, Western Australia) - See all my reviews
I know that they state in the movie that Eragon is based on the book, I ask WHAT Part? It is like they pulled all of the pages out of the book threw them in the air, stacked it back together and slapped it on screen. So frustrating. OK the names are the same, the dragon is blue but really that is about it.

1. Why did they say anything about Arya being a Princess? That is revealed in the second book and it is a big part of her story.
2. Were the Hell are the Dwarfs and who was that guy in with the Staff and the long beard, I have read the book and I could look him up but I should not have too.
3. Murtagh was put in a secure room with food and a bed and treated well for saving Eragons life and not a cell.
4. Who the hell cast Joss Stone as Angela, read the book before you cast, horrible acting, too young and her werecat, were was he?
5. Robert Carlyle was good but not great, he looked fantastic but just not menacing enough
6. Jeremy Irons was a good Brom, Brom was supposed to be older, but at least Jeremy's presence to the part made it believable.
7. Rachel Weisz's voice as Saphira sounded lovely, but it was ran through a computer for special effects echoing.
8. They never mentioned that Brom's dragon's name was Saphira and that Eragon named her without that knowledge. She did not name herself, nor did she morph into a large dragon in the period of 10 seconds.
9. The Vartan did not test Eragon at the entry and they did not just take Arya into the healers, they used her as a way to break Eragons stubbornness.
10. The relationship between Eragon and Saphira was more like a pet and owner than respectful partners. There was no character building, he spends a lot of time with her in the book whilst she grows and she becomes his one true friend when his cousin leaves.
11. I know Edward Speleers is cute but I was expecting someone a little older, his travels take a long time and at the end of it is a muscler fighter not a wimpy boy, in fact when he is standing watching the battle from the ledge, I thought from the body outline that it was a girl.
12. Eragon also goes to the Elves with Ayra at the end of the books to learn more magic.
13. The plot reveals to much and assumes the audience is too stupid to figure anything out. How does everyone know in 5 seconds that Eragon is the one with the egg, from my memory Ayra did not reveal anything.

This movie was just a prime example of what could have happened to Lord of the Rings (and lets face it Eargon, sounds like Aragorn maybe?) if it was given to the wrong director. Thank the Gods it wasn't.

It was not even entertaining to watch, you are trying to take in the beautiful scenery or sink into the relationships of the characters and suddenly you are somewhere else cause the scene changes rapidly, often and abruptly or the character dies.

The flying scenes were too much too often and way too quick.

I just found it horrible. I love adventure movies and am quite happy to suspend my belief for a couple of hours into another world; I couldn't even do this with this movie simply because it was poorly made. There were some very strong actors in this cast, shame the direction was very lacking. God I hope The Golden Compass isn't this bad!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars What happens when writers sign away creative license.., December 29, 2006
I admit that I considered the Eragon books to be entertaining, albeit a bit derivative. They had a certain charm to them about a young lad thrust into events far larger than he could comprehend. However I was disappointed to hear that when Christopher Paolini agreed to let his books become movies he gave up any chance of vetoing any changes that the studio may make.

The result was that the script writers took the rough outline of Star Wars: A New Hope, changed a few names here and there, and titled it Eragon. The end result was a storyline that felt rushed, a plot that wasn't even developed, sets and make-up that look like they hired the cheapest provider, a script that sounded like a 7th grader's creative writing project, and a painfully small number of extras needed for scenes that required more than 10 people on set.

The end result was a film that was painful to see, and felt like a total waste of time. My fiancee, who is an Eragon devotee, felt that they had butchered the whole story just so they could churn it out to make a quick buck from the popularity of the series.

If you want to experiance Eragon, read the book, it's much more involved and doesn't look like a professional script butcherer has mutilated it.

Frankly, this film looks like a Uwe Boll project with a better budget.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 256| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Eragon (Two-Disc Special Edition)
Eragon (Two-Disc Special Edition) by Stefen Fangmeier (DVD - 2007)
$34.98 $18.59
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist