Ethics and the Between (Suny Series in Philosophy) [Paperback]

William Desmond (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: February 2001 | ISBN-10: 0791448487 | ISBN-13: 978-0791448489

Articulates the necessity for a comprehensive reconstructive thinking about the meaning of being good.

Editorial Reviews

From the Back Cover

addresses our current perplexities regarding the devaluation of being in modernity and the shadow of ethical nihilism. He rethinks the sources of value, the diverse ethical ways, the nature of ethical selving and communities, and articulates the necessity for a comprehensive reconstructive thinking about the meaning of being good, consonant with the response to the question of being in Being and the Between, the first book of a planned trilogy.

About the Author

William Desmond is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the International Program of Philosophy in the Higher Institute of Philosophy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Louvain), Belgium. He is the author of many books, including Being and Between, which won both the Prix Cardinal Mercier Award in 1995, as well as the J. N. Findlay Award of the Metaphysical Society of America for the best book in metaphysics

Product Details

• Paperback: 530 pages
• Publisher: State Univ of New York Pr (February 2001)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0791448487
• ISBN-13: 978-0791448489
• Product Dimensions: 9 x 5.9 x 1.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.7 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,698,317 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars A valuable yet tedious study in meta-ethics, August 18, 2006

By 

D. Larson - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Ethics and the Between (Suny Series in Philosophy) (Paperback)

The second book in Desmond's trilogy offers astute critiques of modernity's ethical assumptions, and contains penetrating reflections on phenomenological ethical happenings. However, these observations are mired in an almost unbelievable edifice of terminology. The introduction of a four-fold and a seven-fold schema, and the subsequent revision of each in light of the other, gives the sense that the first half of the text presents a twenty-eight step ethical program.

Actually, the constant redevelopment of terms already introduced, as well as the development of new terms and schemas, is an attempt to further nuance the points made and defend them from potential criticism. Indeed, for the patient reader the text will be found replete with content and pleasant subtleties. But for a less patient reader, terms seem to multiply themselves ad infinitum without immediately adding anything.

It would be a pleasing development if, upon the publication of God and the Between, Desmond would compose a short, single-volume guide to his trilogy. This would allow the reader the chance to become familiar with the direction of his thought and the major points before becoming mired in every terminological detail.

3 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Terribly Written, Moderately Interesting, October 4, 2008

By 

philosophaster - See all my reviews

This review is from: Ethics and the Between (Suny Series in Philosophy) (Paperback)

This is easily the worst philosophical text that I have ever read (with the possible exception of Desmond's own "God and the Between"). Philosophical texts are not usually known for their engaging style, but this is a low point. Desmond apparently fancies himself somewhat of a poet, but his attempt at a lyrical philosophy falls flat (see God and the Between for some of his original "poems" at the beginning of every chapter). It is highly repetitive and tedious to read, but, unlike other repetitive and tedious philosophy, it is severely lacking nuance. Kant, Nietzsche, & Hegel (among others) are given very superficial readings (verging on poor scholarship). Also, the 'arguments' in the book are less logically convincing than they are brainwashingly repetitive; Desmond merely states something so many times that you tend to forget that it is a highly questionable assertion.

At this point you may be wondering why, after this vitriolic review, I have given Ethics and the Between 2/5 stars. I gave this score simply because I think that the main messages of the book, which gets lost in the 500+ pages, are good. There is a need for thought beyond/between dialectical oppositions. The main ethical guidance that the book offers is sound as well (even if it is stated more succinctly in the pages of the New Testament): Agapeic service is the only way to serve the other in his otherness, without imposing your own will to power on him.

In conclusion, save yourself the time and effort required to read this book. Your time would be better spent reading the New Testament for (the same) ethical guidance, and any number of other philosophers who have written on thought after dialectics.