| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
The first part of the book is a description of Webber's conversion to Anglicanism. Rather than giving a strictly chronological telling of his trek, he approaches it from six different aspects of the Christian Faith (mystery, worship, sacraments, spiritual identity, the Church, spirituality) he came to believe were inadequately expressed in Evangelical Protestantism. The turning point in much of his discussion was his discovery of the Church Fathers. In them, he saw a far more balanced vision of Christianity - one he found expressed well in Anglicanism and the worship of the Book of Common Prayer.
The second part of the book consists of the personal testimonies of converts to Anglicanism. Although generally kind towards their former homes, it is obvious the deficiencies of modern Evangelical Protestant worship had taken its toll. A strong point here is each of the testimonies are sufficiently different in background and experience to avoid repetition of the same points. This also gives a sampling of the breadth of the movement to historic Christianity.
Webber returns to finish with a call for Evangelicals and those in the liturgical Churches to grow to know each other better as fellow Christians. While pointing out the factors leading to his move to Anglicanism, Webber recognizes strengths in Evangelicalism (strong personal faith, commitment to orthodoxy, love of Scripture, and concern for mission and evangelism) that would benefit the liturgical Churches. He predicts a convergence of traditions in the next century as the old wounds of the Church finally begin to heal.
In the nearly twenty years since the publication of Evangelicals on the Canterbury Trail, much has happened relating to the points Webber raised - and many of his predictions now seem prophetic. The move to the historical Churches has grown considerably with Evangelical converts bringing their strengths with them to their new homes. Also, there have been many points of honest discussion and a detente of sorts along the ecclesiological front lines (although like other cessations of hostilities it is neither appreciated or observed by all).
Oddly though, Webber's own Anglicanism has not been a major beneficiary. Although the Anglican Communion is growing rapidly in Africa and Asia - where it is orthodox in its beliefs - the Episcopal Church (the U.S. province of the Anglican Communion) has declined and is increasingly both apostate and irrelevant. An obvious choice for a Protestant looking for a liturgical Church, its political correctness is anathema to someone looking for the faith once delivered. Thus most of the converts to historic Christianity have ended elsewhere.
Webber is not to blame for the folly of his Church. His book was the first sign of an important change in the Christian landscape. Although in some points it is now dated, Evangelicals on the Canterbury Trail still affords the reader a rich understanding of both Christian worship and spirituality and a glimpse on the early stages of a significant movement of God.
My story (with the Catholic visits and church fathers) resembles Webber's and the others' testimonies. While mine is slightly different it is not too far off. Webber came from a fundamentalist Baptist tradition (I was a United Methodist), which believed the church went apostate around 100 AD. Webber was also a die hard 5-point Calvinist (as he said '1st a Calvinist, then a Christian'). He also had negative attitudes toward mainline denominations, and especially Catholics. But he found the evangelical church lacking. There was no mystery; it all seemed either too rational or too emotionally subjective. He felt like many things were missing, namely mystery and symbolic worship (such as signing the cross, and anointing with oil). He said he had never felt the resurrection until he went to a Roman Catholic service. Until then the Resurrection was just a cold doctrine he felt like he had to defend.
Like Webber, I can still call myself an evangelical, but I don't mean it in the same way I used to. Like Webber, I have come to appreciate diversity in the church (as long as the creeds can be said honestly).One thing Webber learned was that there is such a thing as the universal and apostolic church, one that transcends denominations, including the Anglican Church.
Like the testimonies in the book, I have no malice toward my old church tradition, in fact I am proud of it in many ways. However, many who know I have become Episcopal often ask "Why?" The best thing I could do would be to point them to this book.