What If Everything You Thought You Knew About AIDS Was Wrong?: The Book That Will Change Your View of HIV and AIDS...and Possibly Change Your Life [Import] [Paperback]

Christine Maggiore (Author)

Product Details

• Paperback: 55 pages
• Publisher: Bridge of Love; 3Rev Ed edition (1996)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1882639170
• ISBN-13: 978-1882639175
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.7 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (54 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,440,199 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

18 of 24 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars False Information Does Not Advance the AIDS Debate, January 7, 2008

By 

Jason D. Florin - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

As a counselor who has given dozens of HIV tests to clients, I must share that much of the information in Christine Maggiore's book is simply false. Although the text is now several years old, and hopefully better information is available to all interested, I still fear that her message will do harm.
I welcome an open debate and discussion on medical topics, and I think it is important to remain skeptical of conventional medical wisdom. However, in the case of HIV, those suffering from the illness do not have the luxury of assuming that the establishment is entirely wrong. We do not fully understand how the virus works and how it affects people differently. But the science is highly accurate, and the research is there. I will not attempt to debunk all of her claims, rather I will just say that many are incorrect, including page 36 where she claims that "HIV is non-cytotoxic." In fact, HIV IS cytotoxic and destroys the host cell once it replicates itself. Medication for people with HIV is aimed at slowing this process.
Historically, these types of views are common. Almost every generation has included naysayers who denounced the commonly held view on a significant medical ailment. I am not trying to defend the medical community in any way, but I think it is important to remember that her work does not provide accurate information, and her theory is based on personal interest , not on scientific fact.

39 of 54 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Be very cautious..., June 13, 2005

By 

DJ, MD (USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: What If Everything You Thought You Knew About AIDS Was Wrong? (Paperback)

Being an MD, I would caution readers to be careful in forming some of the opinions posted in reviews. You might want to visit http://www.niaid.nih.gov/publications/hivaids/hivaids.htm for reference. I can say I personally am not influenced or swayed by drug companies or money, etc that was mentioned in a review. I also do not base a diagnosis on "prejudices". It's hard to not interpret a positive HIV screen, followed by a positive Western blot, along with a low CD-4 and high viral load as anything but what it is. As for the deaths only resulting from the medications in one review...why did all those AIDS patients die in early years BEFORE we had any treatments??? If no modern medical treatments are needed, why do these patients bother going to the doctor when all else fails? One last piece of advice....the 11th hour is not the time to suddenly find faith in the evil healthcare system and expect a miraculous outcome.

59 of 84 people found the following review helpful:

1.0 out of 5 stars Epilogue: Her child is DEAD from Aids, September 24, 2005

By 

Anthony Sanchez (Fredericksburg, va United States) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: What If Everything You Thought You Knew About AIDS Was Wrong? (Paperback)

How dangerous is this book and the author? Her three year old daughter is now dead from Aids. Read about it in the L.A. Times 24 September 2005. All because the author's (and her husband's) anti-science ideas of HIV as espoused in this book.

Has their daughter's death changed their attitudes on HIV testing? No, the author wouldn't want to take any responsibility, so she set up a web cite dedicated to how much she "loves" (sorry, make that "loved") her daughter. However, she still claims that her daughter did not die of Aids!

I work as a child abuse/neglect specialist. The doctors involved (one of whom served three years criminal probation) are fully responsible. The Los Angeles child protective services are also responsible for failing to act correctly on an earlier medical neglect complaint (the parents' failure to test the child for Aids/HIV). Those of you who supported this author by buying her book of half-brained ideas and thereby also endangering other children are too responsible. But, most responsible for this little girl's death are the father and mother. For the glory of publicity and book sales, they sacrificed the child.