2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Details Suggest Intent Rather than Randomness to Ten Scientists, May 6, 2011
This review is from: Evidence of Purpose: Scientists Discover the Creator (Hardcover)
"When they found Him, they said to Him, 'Everyone is looking for You.' But He said to them, 'Let us go into the next towns, that I may preach there also, because for this purpose I have come forth.' And He was preaching in their synagogues throughout all Galilee, and casting out demons." -- Mark 1:37-39 (NKJV)
In many minds, science is science and religion is religion. Some also make the distinction that faith is also faith. In a lab, most conversations will be about science. In a church, religion will predominate. While praying, faith will probably take the lead.
Is it possible to cross such boundaries and to connect the perspectives? In Evidence of Purpose, scientists provide ten footnoted essays based their perspectives as follows:
"Dare a Scientist Believe in Design?" -- Professor Owen Gingerich (astronomy and history of science)
"God's Purpose in and Beyond Time" -- Professor Russell Stannard (physics)
"The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Science" -- Professor Paul Davies (physics)
"Evidence of Purpose in the Universe" -- Adjunct Professor Walter R. Hearn (biochemistry)
"Cosmology: Evidence for God or Partner for Theology?" -- Dr. Robert John Russell (Ph.D. in physics and an ordained United Church of Christ minister)
"Science and God the Creator" -- Reverend Doctor Arthur Peacocke (chemistry)
"A Potent Universe" -- Dr. John Polkingborne (physics)
"The Evolution of Purpose" -- Nobel Laureate John C. Eccles (physiology and medicine)
"A Physiologist Looks at Purpose" -- Professor Daniel H. Osmond (physiology and medicine)
"How Blind a Watchmaker?" -- Professor David Wilcox (biology)
These essays will mostly appeal to those who don't know much about science and haven't heard much about what scientists think other from those who are committed atheists. The essays also make some interesting observations about the potential relationships between scientific and theological thinking. While the reading isn't heavy-duty science by any means, the essayists assume that you have some passing familiarity with the major scientific findings of the last century or so. Given the subject, that's not too much to expect.
As you might suspect from the book's title, the essays argue for useful roles of science and theology engaging with one another. It's far from a full range of opinions. There are no essays arguing against any possibility of engagement, and no one comes from a Bible as literal truth view of the physical world.
If you like to think about "big questions," I think you'll enjoy most of the essays. I found "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Science" to be the most thought-provoking essay. "A Physiologist Looks at Purpose" was the most engaging exposition. If you find you like those, you'll probably be interested in some of the other scientific perspectives.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Dare scientists believe in design?, January 6, 2008
This review is from: Evidence of Purpose: Scientists Discover the Creator (Hardcover)
By the middle of the last century, science had at last triumphed over superstition, and science had also, to a degree, put aside the notion that a Creator existed. However, many scientists see no reason to separate the two. Albert Einstein is famously quoted as saying, "Science without religion is blind, and religion without science is lame." This book contains ten thought-provoking essays from scientists who see evidence of design in the universe.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No