Most Helpful Customer Reviews
53 of 63 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Promising, but flawed, October 20, 2006
This review is from: Evolution and Christian Faith: Reflections of an Evolutionary Biologist (Hardcover)
Like the author of this book, I am both a Christian and an evolutionary biologist. As such, I welcome any contribution to the too-few voices calling for an end to the creationism/evolution controversy. And Roughgarden's book makes a good many valid and important points that I wish more people would notice. However, the book is undermined by its flaws.
Roughgarden's approach to the Bible seems to be "read it absolutely literally except the bits you find evidence against, and reject those bits completely." Such an inconsistent hermeneutic is hardly likely to impress many believers. It is possible to find, through sincere faith and careful scholarship, a consistent approach to Biblical interpretation that avoids both the narrow Bibliolatry of the literalists and the casual dismissal of theological liberals.
Roughgarden's presentation of evolutionary theory is strangely flawed. She does an excellent job of presenting the basic claims of evolutionary biology in her early chapters (her choice of "natural breeding" to replace the more familiar "natural selection" is a particularly excellent idea), and her critique of Intelligent Design is spot on (I only wish it were longer, there are even more problems with ID than she mentions-- but then, this is a short book so the brevity is appropriate). However she stumbles when she discusses the "problems" that social behavior creates for evolutionary biology, seeming to be entirely unaware of the substantial literature dealing with it and of principles such as inclusive fitness that address it. Roughgarden may disagree with inclusive fitness, but that's no reason to pretend that biologists are utterly at sea without even a suggestion to make. Following that, her chapter on sexual selection not merely stumbles but falls flat on its face. She presents a ridiculous straw man that has little to do with any actual sexual selection theory and concludes that evolutionary biology's approach to it is irredeemably flawed. Discussing the errors in this chapter would take a chapter in itself. In brief, she asserts that sexual selection theory requires mated pairs to be in competition while in truth their activity in producing offspring is cooperative. Indeed it is cooperative, but this has nothing to do with sexual selection-- which is over and done with by the time a mated pair exists. Sexual selection concerns the way in which organisms choose their mates: what selective forces influence how they will choose? What will be the effect of that choice on the evolution of the opposite sex? I doubt that Roughgarden actually believes that organisms exercise no choice in mating whatsoever, so her rejection of this area of theory is hard to understand. Perhaps her erroneous belief that sexual selection absolutely requires that females always be the choosy sex has something to do with it. She introduces this with a few examples of Victorian sexism from Darwin's writings, a source more than a century out of date, and then refutes them with counterexamples well known to, and well researched by, those who study sexual selection.
In fact, Roughgarden's chapter on sexual selection is so ludicrous it casts a pall over the entire rest of the book. As an evolutionary biologist myself, I can see that her earlier chapters are accurate despite this strange failure, but biologists who are skeptical of Christianity will likely react with the assumption that Roughgarden is too ill-informed to be taken seriously, while Christians skeptical of evolution may be impressed, but are being set up for a fall if they learn more later.
It is a pity that these flaws bring down what is an otherwise welcome voice crying "Peace!" We need more-- and need them to be more careful in both their theology and their science.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
20 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
a little gem, March 19, 2007
This review is from: Evolution and Christian Faith: Reflections of an Evolutionary Biologist (Hardcover)
Joan Roughgarden, an evolutionary biologist at Stanford since 1972 and an active Christian in her Episcopal church, wrote this book, she says, to provide a succinct statement of exactly what evolutionary biology does and does not know, and how the Bible relates to that scientific knowledge. The book is short enough to read in a few sittings, has no footnotes at all, avoids bogging down in secondary literature on the subject, and is written at a level for people with limited knowledge of science. I especially appreciated her irenic spirit.
At its simplest level evolution teaches that all of life is related in one big family tree, and that species change over space and time through "natural breeding" (as opposed to artificial breeding, for example, that farmers and others do today). Because of random mutations in the genes that are passed on from the "original" to the "copies," changes occur, some of which are favorable and some of which are deleterious. These mutations are random, but whether the overall evolutionary process has any "direction" good or bad is hotly debated among evolutionary biologists, says Roughgarden. Finally, she thinks Darwin is badly wrong about universal sex roles in which aggressive males seek passive females in a competition of perpetual conflict. She believes that cooperation and interdependence (eg, an ant colony) are as important in nature as conflict.
Roughgarden insists that there need not be any conflict between science and religion, or that they need to be relegated to separate spheres (but see pp. 56, and 83 where she seems to qualify this). "Intelligent design," she believes, invents problems that don't exist, is hard to take seriously, and so is a "non-starter" for mainstream science. She consigns ID to "junk science" along with the many versions of "junk religion." As one might expect, Roughgarden shines when it comes to science, but less so on matters theological and Biblical. But this is still a gem of a little book for those, as she says, who need to come up to speed on the subject for a Sunday school class or school board meeting, and it is heartening for a well-placed biologist like her to publish such an unapologetic confession of Christian faith.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
23 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
evangelical pastor loves this book, November 7, 2006
This review is from: Evolution and Christian Faith: Reflections of an Evolutionary Biologist (Hardcover)
Joan Roughgarden's book on evolutionary science and Christian faith is nothing short of delightful. The "priest theologian" who trashed this book in his review missed the point of this work entirely. It is brief, written in a folksy, conversational tone, as though one were sitting down with a fellow parishoner who happens to be a brilliant evolutionary biologist. I was stunned by the simplicity and clarity of Roughgarden's explanation of evolutionary thought stripped of the language of scientific privilege. Excellent science writers like Richard Dawkins and John Gribben can't approach the elegance of her descrptions of the core evolutionary principles: all life is related, through natural breeding, populations tend to become like the members who breed the most, etc. These descriptions are designed to be accessible to those who are unfamiliar with the language of evolutionary biology and whose sensibilities are shaped by a biblical vocabulary. Given Roughgarden's stature as a scientist, this is a wonder indeed.
In the process Roughgarden shows the unsustainability of Stephen Jay Gould's sterile "seperate magesterium" approach and Richard Dawkins proclivity to bash relgion by taking the name of science in vain. But all of this is done with characteristic gentleness. In fact, the prevailing tone of this little volume is love. If it's true that we can only understand what we love, Roughgarden is on a path to deep understanding here at the intersection of science and faith. This book is, in the best sense of the term, an exercise in devotion: to science and to faith.
That scientists may take exception to Roughgarden's critique of her own science while theologians may disagree with her critique of her own faith tradition is to be expected given the ferment in each of these worlds these days. Roughgarden is to be thanked for wading in where angels fear to tread. It's no accident, I think, that Roughgarden was raised by Anglican missionaries. This little book betrays the effort of one who has chosen to walk the middle way, between two worlds, conversant in each for the sake of love. Her missionary parents would be proud one imagines, this being a conversation desperately in need of a little less vitriol and a lot more love. Reviewed by Ken Wilson, Senior Pastor Vineyard Church of Ann Arbor.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
