Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered (Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology) Hardcover – July 13, 2003


See all 5 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$138.15 $49.95
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology
  • Hardcover: 351 pages
  • Publisher: The MIT Press (July 13, 2003)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0262232294
  • ISBN-13: 978-0262232296
  • Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.4 x 0.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #6,879,504 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Evolution and Learning is a readable and challenging volume, and I would recommend it strongly to people who enjoy thinking hard about evolution." - Kevin N. Laland, Nature" --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

About the Author

Bruce H. Weber is the Robert Woodworth Professor of Science and Natural Philosophy at Bennington College and Professor of Biochemistry at California State University at Fullerton.

David J. Depew is Professor of Communication Studies and Rhetoric of Inquiry at the University of Iowa.

Important Information

Ingredients
Example Ingredients

Directions
Example Directions

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
3
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 9 people found the following review helpful By Herbert Gintis on May 28, 2007
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
In the history of biology, Lamarkians were the humanists who believed that experience could enrich the genetic structure of organisms. When Weissmann proved the continuity of the germ line, which implies that phenotypic learning could not be incorporated in the genes of an organism's offspring, it led to panic for the Lamarkians. James Mark Baldwin, the developmental biologist, Lloyd Morgan and Conrad Waddington all jumped to fill the breach with a variety of mechanisms that would allow some causal arrow from learning to genes to survive the "continuity of the germ line."

Of course, phenotypes, not genotypes, are selected, so there is ample room for plastic phenotypes to be selected, and the genetic basis of their plasticity or ease of learning to adapt to particular environments to become fixed in the gene pool. However, until Dawkins' "extended phenotype" and more recently Odling-Smee, Laland, and Feldman's "niche construction" theories were developed, the whole matter was quite vague.

This conference volume outlines the history of the Baldwin Effect, and the effect of the interchange of expert opinion on the reader should be pretty clear: niche construction and in the case of humans, gene-culture coevolution are the intellectual heirs of the Baldwin Effect and are extremely important biological phenomena. Paul Griffiths' and Terrence Deacon's contributions to the volume make this crystal clear. Numerous evo-devo types also want to claim a piece of the Baldwin effect, but despite reams of material on how development affects the gene pool, I remain unconvinced. But, perhaps that's my limited perspective. At any rate, if you know a fair amount of evolutionary and developmental biology, this is really quite a fine book to read. Perhaps even better than attending the original conference.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By Viktor Blasjo on March 26, 2009
Format: Hardcover
Godfrey-Smith. The Baldwin effect purports that acquired traits can become genetically assimilated. This is supposedly because learning is fallible and expensive in terms of time and cognitive resources, so a hard-wiring is beneficial. Two objections arise. First, the process seems self-defeating, since it is triggered by learning but ends up giving up plasticity for rigidity. Second, the learning step seems superfluous: why not go straight to the innate trait? To this latter objection three replies have been given. (1) Breathing space (Baldwin). Learning enables the species to survive long enough for the right combination of genes or mutation to occur. This assumes that the ability to acquire a trait is more prevalent than having a gene for it, so the self-defeating argument applies. Also, "do-or-die" situations are very rare. (2) Good learners are genetically closer to the innate configuration for the trait, bringing it within genetic reach. The Hinton and Nowlan simulation which is supposed to show the feasibility of the Baldwin effect actually has this dubious assumption built in to it. The genome is modelled as a string made up of the symbols 0, 1, ?, where 111... is the optimum, and ?-bits leave room for trial-and-error learning. Obviously, good learners (i.e., those who hit upon 111... by randomising their ?s) will generally have more hard-wired 1s than poor learners. So selection for learning and selection for innateness coincide: the model does not leave room for other forms of learning improvement such as skewing the randomisation or increasing the number of trials.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Alex on April 19, 2013
Format: Paperback
Several leading evolutionary thinkers discuss the Baldwin Effect in this volume, including Daniel Dennett, Terrence Deacon, and Bruce Weber. The book first illuminates what the Baldwin Effect is and traces its history in evolutionary theory, and then discusses its relevance to current theorizing. I picked up the book because I loved both of Deacon's other books--the Symbolic Species and Incomplete Nature--and he contributes a couple chapters to this volume. I've come away from it with a deeper understanding of evolutionary theory and how evolution might operate.

I appreciated getting dissenting opinions on what the Baldwin Effect is, how it might operate, and whether it matters. The book is the product of a conference, and reading it feels a bit like attending a series of lectures on a topic. If you are interested in how development and learning during and organism's lifetime might influence genetic evolution, this is a great book. It's a particular niche subject, and you probably need to have a basic understanding of evolutionary theory to dive in, but once you do, this book provide a very cool approach. The idea that changes in an organism's development and behavior patterns over its life could either help speed and direct evolution is really fascinating and counter-intuitive. The Baldwin Effect is sort of the tail wagging the dog--organisms learning new skills can effectively change their ecology such that the new skill becomes coded genetically.

Basically, I'd recommend this to anyone who read (and liked) Deacon's Symbolic Species, or anyone who found the above idea exciting. If it's possible for an academic discussion to get you going, this one will.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again