Customer Reviews

165
4.5 out of 5 stars
Evolve Your Brain: The Science of Changing Your Mind
Format: PaperbackChange
Price:$14.39 + Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Showing 1-10 of 10 reviews (3 star)show all reviews
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful
Format: Paperback
Overall I enjoyed reading this book, although I did find it somewhat misleading regarding the scientific "paradigm" it offers and the minority philosophical points underlying it, and I was disappointed that there was not more practical applications of the author's interesting model.

My take on this book was almost the opposite of many of the other reviewers here who were either so impressed by the fact that someone would try to sue use science to support "free will" or so dismayed by the amount neuroscience in this book. Neither of those things seems that impressive to me. There *is* a lot of neuroscience here, and much of it is better than average (for a popular non-technical book anyway), but there is also some crude and I think poorly thought out philosophy as well. And the ironic thing for me was that the principles the author espouses for change are pretty mundane and don't really require either the neuroscience or the "consciousness precedes matter" philosophy.

The reasonable principles include such straightforward suggestions as envisioning your end point to organize action, using deliberate shifts of attention to change direction, using rehearsal to change habits, identifying destructive habits of thought, take responsibility for change, and make well-being a priority. Great ideas, but they don't really need the intro to neurosci or quantum physics in my opinion.

Brain science would have been more appropriate if the author had gone into more details about how we make decisions, showing how to influence the thinking process (e.g. see The Owner's Manual for the Brain: Everyday Applications from Mind-Brain Research 3rd Edition), but he avoids *that* sort of research, probably because it would dilute the philosophical message of "free will" that the author seems very concerned with promoting. If there are causal influences on thought, then it doesn't seem so free afterall, the opposite of the rhetorical message of this book.

The author does a pretty good job most of the time selecting and deriving pertinent lessons from neuroscience data and he gives some optimistic and realistic applications for how we can and do change ourselves sometimes. Where there is practical advice given, most of it seems very good to me, which is why I like this book overall and gave it a fairly good rating as inspirational self-help that tries hard to be scientific. As such it may for many people turn out to be a nice corrective to the scientific pessimism they find from many old school medical and psychological experts who are overly deterministic in their prognoses. I guess that's why so many reviewers seem so taken with this book, it does have an element of hope in it dressed in science, and we are more used to getting skepticism or pessimism in scientific treatments.

The author and I both seem to agree that we *can* change ourselves and influence our healing processes deliberately to some degree by rewiring our own nervous system in places, and we both also respect and commit ourselves to scientific causal models. We also both seem to be "compatibilists," people who beleive that our sense of free will and scientific determinism can be adequately reconciled. That far, I liked this book. We may disagree on the limits of self-change in practice in some specific spots, but I think the basic concept of self-healing and self-change is sound and welcome.

However the author also seems to have struggled with the philosophical problem of "top-down causation" at some point and I don't agree with or like the resolution he came up with. The whole concept from the start begins with the idea that thoughts trigger all sorts of physical things that have lasting effects. The author spends a lot of time in the book giving detailed examples of this. I have no problem with that, although it should be mentioned that this is not something new, it has been pretty well documented for decades by other authors, e.g. The Healer Within: The New Medicine of Mind and Body and Psychobiology of Mind-Body Healing: New Concepts of Therapeutic Hypnosis.

The problem with this particular book that I didn't have with those others is: where did the thought itself come from and what is its manifestation in the brain? That's where the author mostly just hand waves the brain mechanisms and defers to the ancient archaic version of "free will" as something that floats free of physical reality through some obscure unspecified quantum mechanical rationale. Why does he need this stretch to point out that we can change ourselves? I don't think he does.

The way thoughts themselves arise is one of the most important and interesting aspects of brain science, and still largely a mystery. The author's good but selective review of neuroscience mentions "free will" a lot but never all the wonderful data that has been accumulated regarding how we make decisions or where our perceptions and misperceptions of "free will" come from. Free will, in the sense that it actually exists and is worth seeking, is not something that escapes the brain and then reprograms it as the author claims, it is a result of that same remarkable brain, even if not entirely understood. At least that is a more interesting and promising line scientifically than hand waving about quantum weirdness and how "thoughts" as disembodied entities cause things to happen in the body. From my perspective, the illusion that makes us feel as if thought has to be non-physical is addressed well in: The Illusion of Conscious Will (Bradford Books) and Freedom Evolves

This "new paradigm" of the author is actually more philosophy and pop science speculation than hard science I think. It isn't terrible by any means, or impossible, and he isn't alone in considering it, but it is not really a new scientific model at all in any interesting experimental sense. It has been around for a while and has had a small, marginal, but dedicated following outside of mainstream science (and more broadly in popular media).

The author applies the problematic "consciousness is prior to matter" philosophical stance and then at the end of the book he throws in the traditional idiosyncratic interpretation of quantum physics to make the point more "scientific." To be fair, this view is reasonable philosophically and more to the point, I suppose may help non-scientists better appreciate human potential for change, which seems to be the author's primary overriding goal. But personally I think it is a technically completely unneccessary and misleading way to resolve the issue raised by top-down causation. For details on the philsophical issues, Jaegwon Kim's books are particularly helpful, such as: Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation (Representation and Mind)

"Top-down causation," is the problem of how the mind, as a product of the brain, can then turn around and influence the body. I would say that this is a problem of how some aspects of brain function can influence others. The author instead joins those modern day Cartesians who evade the scientific problem with philosophy by making "thought" something outside of the physical world that causes things to happen in the physical world. Yes, I agree with the author that whatever a thought is in the brain does cause other things to happen in the body, but I disagree with him that it requires a weird non-physicalist take on consciousness and quantum mechanics to achieve this in principle. I particularly don't like that he claims this is some sort of new scientific paradigm. It is an old philosophical idea. There's a nice account of the difference between this intuitive view and the scientific worldview in: The Problem of the Soul: Two Visions of Mind and How to Reconcile Them

This idea is certainly considered seriously by some philosophers, especially those who feel it is impossible to solve "hard problems" like qualia with physical explanations. But there is very little science here that applies to these ideas unless you really stretch and squint an awful lot at a few marginal experiments that could just as well be interpreted in other ways.

More importantly, the book doesn't really have as much in the way of practical ideas as I would have liked. The "science of changing your mind" should actually have a lot in it about changing your mind, rather than just explaining why it should be possible to change your mind.

So I don't think this was pioneering science because of its unneccessary odd digressions of philosophy and quantum physics, and I don't think it is a good how-to book, but I think the author makes a good case from neuroscience for the possibility of changing ourselves. I did find some value in the author's general model of how we change, but that would have made a better article than a book.

If the author had taken his model of change and neuroscience references and applied them to many practical examples rather than using them to promote an idiosyncratic underlying theory, this would have been a superb book in my opinion.

As it is, it is a better than average "alternative science" book. A worthwhile spiritual and also practical message combined with a mixture of real scientific and also very idiosyncratic models.
77 commentsWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
20 of 23 people found the following review helpful
Format: Hardcover
The actual useful information in this book doesn't show up until after 300 pages, and could have been a ten-page pamphlet. If you are looking for a primer on brain anatomy and mis-interpreted quantum theory peppered with lots of boring anecdotes, this is your book. I gave it three stars because there IS quite a lot of information on brain anatomy and cognition in the book.

However, there is little application presented for the information, other than the idea that you become more like what you practice being (okay, maybe it wouldn't have filled a whole pamphlet). I cannot find a persuasive reason to recommend this book.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
20 of 23 people found the following review helpful
on April 19, 2008
Format: HardcoverVerified Purchase
While this book is well-written and packed with technical information about the brain, it is not at all about "evolving your brain". A better title for this book would be "How the Brain Works". I was on page 320 when I realized this book wasn't going in the direction I hoped it would. Detail after detail about the way a brain works. Quite the opposite of what I hoped.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
on May 1, 2013
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
Very, very heavy on physiology; very, very light on how to use that physiology to change behavior. Will lose most readers before getting to the point.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on August 14, 2013
Format: Kindle Edition
Some interesting insights but I was hoping for more plausible scientific reasons to support his theories.A little disappointed because I had high hopes!
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on January 14, 2013
Format: Kindle EditionVerified Purchase
I have mixed feelings about this book.
I'm not sure the personal experience of the author with spinal injury is wise to follow. He got spinal injury, and contrarily to advice of all consulted surgeons he chose not to go for surgery and heal with "his mind".
What might have worked for him, might put other people in danger. Usually these kind of stories should come with a serious disclaimer.

Also the fact that the author is engaged with Rathma movement removes some of it's credibility.
I would have preferred a more secular approach. If the author can believe Rathma movements claims, what credibility should I give to his own claims ?

Also this book is unnecessarily long, difficult to digest. Once you finish the book how do you go over to grasp the knowledge ? Those authors should write in a more concise, schematic and organized ways for readers to apply their knowledge. Such self help books should gravitate around the 300 pages mark. Both theoretical and practical knowledge from this book could have easily fitted in this amount.

Other than this, there are very interesting discussion on brain plasticity, brain mechanics and various brain states such as stress.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on November 14, 2008
Format: Paperback
I am already a believer in the power of the mind.

I know we can change our lives with thought power and I know we are capable of self healing. This book has very complex and lengthy scientific explanations.

If you really want in depth SCIENCE of Mind then this book will deliver.(510 pages worth) Evolve your brain starts out as an autobiography becomes a technical text book and then follows with interviews, throw in some philosophy for good measure and then in conclusion how-to techniques.

I don't think we needed all the brain anatomy information. For an easier read minus the strong scientific basis, I would rather recommend Mind Power by John Kehoe. It is a summarised version and far more practical read.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
1 of 3 people found the following review helpful
on August 22, 2013
Format: Kindle Edition
I enjoyed the book and was looking forward to getting into the meditation. To find I had to purchase it, beyond what I paid for the book turned me off. I haven't picked it up since. I like that he wrote it all out. I thought I could read out loud and record, but I felt kinda ripped off the the book was a lead up to the meditation. I have minimal financial resources, so paying more hits me hard. This may not be a big deal for others, but it is for me.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful
on August 27, 2014
Format: PaperbackVerified Purchase
returned IT ,DIDN'T NEED IT FOR SCHOOL
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
2 of 6 people found the following review helpful
on January 15, 2009
Format: Paperback
I enjoyed being reminded of what I already knew--that it's not easy to change a habit and your body and mind are not going to like it very well, however, 1.who's going to spend 40 minutes a day visualizing the desired result and 2. can we really grow new brain cells? He cites some really impressive studies in the major medical journals. I can see groups growing up around this book as it would take peer support to do these things. Otherwise, I think it's a wonderful book and I'm glad I bought it. I am reading it for the second time and hilighting the important phrases and paragraphs, however I just wish it were more practical.
0CommentWas this review helpful to you?YesNoSending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
     
 
Customers who viewed this also viewed

You Are the Placebo: Making Your Mind Matter
You Are the Placebo: Making Your Mind Matter by Joe Dispenza (Hardcover - April 29, 2014)
$19.88

Meditations for Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself
Meditations for Breaking the Habit of Being Yourself by Joe Dispenza (Audio CD - November 7, 2013)
$14.92
 
     

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.

Your Recently Viewed Items and Featured Recommendations 
 

After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.