Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth (Studies in Legal History)

2 customer reviews
ISBN-13: 978-0674274259
ISBN-10: 0674274253
Why is ISBN important?
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The 13-digit and 10-digit formats both work.
Scan an ISBN with your phone
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Buy used
In Stock. Sold by anybookltduk
Condition: Used: Acceptable
Comment: Re-bound by libraryThis book has hardback covers.Ex-library,With usual stamps and markings,In fair condition, suitable as a study copy.No dust jacket.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
22 Used from $2.63
+ $3.99 shipping
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover, January 1, 1974
"Please retry"
$113.57 $2.63
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"
More Buying Choices
4 New from $113.57 22 Used from $2.63
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

InterDesign Brand Store Awareness Rent Textbooks

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Raoul Berger was Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History at the Harvard Law School. Among his books is Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth.

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Studies in Legal History
  • Hardcover: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press (January 1, 1974)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674274253
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674274259
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.5 x 1.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,048,898 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Important Information

Example Ingredients

Example Directions

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful By J. Friedland on June 6, 2008
Format: Hardcover
I well remember reading this book 35 years ago. Berger attacks the idea of "Executive Privilege" and never lets up. He goes through the history of it, discovering there never was any discussions in the Congress or constitutional convention backing up the concept of Executive Privilege. It's basically all from memo's written up by subordinates to Eisenhower to provide him justification, after the fact, for some actions that Eisenhower may have taken. Most of the memos relied upon conjecture and argumentation -- not constitutional law discussion to arrive at conclusions that backed up Eisenhower. Those memos were familiar to Nixon who used what he recalled from them to justify the actions of Nixon's administration.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By Bob Guess on April 2, 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Berger states, "A long-standing guide to construction is: what was the mischief the draftsmen sought to remedy." That theme runs through all of his books. The man is extremely well read. When he published Executive Privelege, A Constitutional Myth, no sane Supreme Court Justice dared challenge him. Where in the Constitution, by direct quote or implication, does the Executive Branch of our government have the authority to withhold information from its partners, the Judicial and Congressional Branches? If you had three partners in business with specific duties which intertwined, could one partner simply buy ten thousand acres, or for that matter sell ten thousand acres, without the knowledge and signatures of his partners? If he had no power of attorney to do so, it would be a breach of relationship. A breach of the design of government is actually a form of sedition. Berger reveals; Professor Arthur Schlesinger, Jr, concluded that the term "executive privilege" seems to be of very recent American usage . . . I cannot find that any President or Attorney General used it before the Eisenhower administration." Berger realized that the word "executive" was a post-revolutionary concept. Executive was not considered a noun; therefore, imputing exclusive power in any branch that would exclude oversight, would be to place it above the law. Some quotes from the Constitutional Framers in his book; Roger Sherman " . . . considered the Executive magistracy as nothing more than an institution for carrying the will of the legislature into effect"
James Wilson: the only powers that were strictly Executive were ". . . those executing the laws and appointing officers."
Governor Randolph: "What are his powers? To see the laws executed. Every executive in America has that power.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again