Buy Used
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Condition: Very good condition., Chipped dust jacket. Binding: Hardback. / Publisher: Harvard University Press / Pub. Date: 1974 Attributes: xvi, 430 p. 25 cm. / Stock#: 2055243 (FBA) * * *This item qualifies for FREE SHIPPING and Amazon Prime programs! * * *
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth (Studies in Legal History) Hardcover – January 1, 1974

ISBN-13: 978-0674274259 ISBN-10: 0674274253

Price: $12.98
1 New from $2,432.64 41 Used from $0.01
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$2,432.64 $0.01
Unknown Binding
"Please retry"



Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Series: Studies in Legal History
  • Hardcover: 384 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press (January 1, 1974)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674274253
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674274259
  • Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.5 x 1.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,792,494 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Raoul Berger was Charles Warren Senior Fellow in American Legal History at the Harvard Law School. Among his books is Executive Privilege: A Constitutional Myth.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful By J. Friedland on June 6, 2008
Format: Hardcover
I well remember reading this book 35 years ago. Berger attacks the idea of "Executive Privilege" and never lets up. He goes through the history of it, discovering there never was any discussions in the Congress or constitutional convention backing up the concept of Executive Privilege. It's basically all from memo's written up by subordinates to Eisenhower to provide him justification, after the fact, for some actions that Eisenhower may have taken. Most of the memos relied upon conjecture and argumentation -- not constitutional law discussion to arrive at conclusions that backed up Eisenhower. Those memos were familiar to Nixon who used what he recalled from them to justify the actions of Nixon's administration.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Bob Guess on April 2, 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Berger states, "A long-standing guide to construction is: what was the mischief the draftsmen sought to remedy." That theme runs through all of his books. The man is extremely well read. When he published Executive Privelege, A Constitutional Myth, no sane Supreme Court Justice dared challenge him. Where in the Constitution, by direct quote or implication, does the Executive Branch of our government have the authority to withhold information from its partners, the Judicial and Congressional Branches? If you had three partners in business with specific duties which intertwined, could one partner simply buy ten thousand acres, or for that matter sell ten thousand acres, without the knowledge and signatures of his partners? If he had no power of attorney to do so, it would be a breach of relationship. A breach of the design of government is actually a form of sedition. Berger reveals; Professor Arthur Schlesinger, Jr, concluded that the term "executive privilege" seems to be of very recent American usage . . . I cannot find that any President or Attorney General used it before the Eisenhower administration." Berger realized that the word "executive" was a post-revolutionary concept. Executive was not considered a noun; therefore, imputing exclusive power in any branch that would exclude oversight, would be to place it above the law. Some quotes from the Constitutional Framers in his book; Roger Sherman " . . . considered the Executive magistracy as nothing more than an institution for carrying the will of the legislature into effect"
James Wilson: the only powers that were strictly Executive were ". . . those executing the laws and appointing officers."
Governor Randolph: "What are his powers? To see the laws executed. Every executive in America has that power.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?