Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Existential Reasons for Belief in God: A Defense of Desires and Emotions for Faith Paperback – March 23, 2011
|New from||Used from|
Top 20 lists in Books
View the top 20 best sellers of all time, the most reviewed books of all time and some of our editors' favorite picks. Learn more
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
"Practical and pastoral theologians should welcome the significance Professor Williams affirms in the confluence of human emotions and religious faith, both historically in sacred scriptures and in contemporary life experiences." (Patricia Marsden-Dole, Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses, 41(3))
"I highly recommend Existential Reasons for Belief in God as a clear, well-presented and insightful work that could provide a framework for further helpful work in living the Christian life and being a Christian and a feminist." (Mark McLeod-Harrison, Christian Feminism Today, Fall 2011)
4/5 Stars "This book--tightly argued, yet accessible to non-philosophers--will make you think. . . . In William's work, one finds echoes of 'postconservative' theologians, who remind us that Christianity is about transformation, not just information. But the genius of this book is that it doesn't swing the pendulum too far. Or perhaps more appopriately, Williams shows that reason and emotion are not opposing poles on a single continuum at all; each has its place in the cultivation, strengthening, and defense of Christian belief. For those of us who need a faith at once meaningful and reasonable, that is good news." (Michael McGowan, Christianity Today, June 2011)
"Williams makes an intriguing effort to side-step the sheerly rationalistic claims of today's atheists through emotion; his book will provide interesting talking points for thoughtful seekers across many traditions." (Library Journal, March 1, 2011)
"We humans--most of us, anyway, most of the time--are rational, truth-seeking agents. But equally we are emotional creatures with existential needs, and we seek to meet those needs. Traditional Christian apologetics focuses on the former characteristic, offering evidence to believe that the Christian faith is true. Clifford Williams calls our attention to a second approach, one aimed at the second characteristic. Echoing thinkers such as Pascal and Kierkegaard, Williams's 'existential argument' shows that Christian faith can be justified--we may properly believe--just because faith satisfies certain existential needs. Williams develops his argument in a philosophically rich way, augmented with examples showing how for many people faith is engendered and sustained by existential arguments. Deep insights abound as Williams considers and rejects common objections to existential arguments. In the end, Williams doesn't reject evidential arguments, but urges us to pay closer attention to our emotional needs and their role in faith formation. I highly recommend this significant addition to the apologetic literature." (Garrett J. DeWeese, Professor of Philosophy and Philosophical Theology, Talbot School of Theology, Biola University)
"Clifford Williams's work is a powerful defense of the role that needs and emotions play in the formation and preservation of religious faith. Williams gives a powerful account of the way reason and emotion work together to produce a faith that is both rational and personal. Although the book is philosophically first-rate, it is written so clearly and powerfully that any thoughtful person can follow the argument. The inclusion of many personal stories gives the book added punch; Williams not only thinks about emotions but appeals to our emotions in an engaging manner." (C. Stephen Evans, University Professor of Philosophy and Humanities, Baylor University)
"Williams breathes new life into the provocative view that human emotions play a central role in legitimate belief in God. Drawing from Kierkegaard and Unamuno, he dares to portray belief in God as something much more personally robust and engaging than a mere solution to an intellectual puzzle. The book will benefit all serious inquirers regarding belief in God." (Paul K. Moser, Loyola University Chicago)
"Clifford Williams has composed an engaging, profoundly personal account of the reasons for belief in the God of Christianity. This is decidedly not a detached or merely academic work but a book that speaks directly to the needs, emotions and best thinking of its readers." (Charles Taliaferro, professor of philosophy, St. Olaf College)
About the Author
More About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
The author opens the book with two questions: "1) Is it legitimate to acquire faith in God solely through satisfaction of needs? 2) Does faith in God consist of emotions?" (12)
Well what do you think?
The author contends that "the ideal way to acquire faith in God is through both need and reason, and that faith should consist of both emotion and assent." (12) While Rationalists emphasize reason and Emotionalists emphasize emotion and need, Williams wants to emphasize both, especially in defending the legitimacy of acquiring faith through need, emotion, and reason.
He does so in the context of arguing eight themes:
1) Emotion and need can be trusted for faith in God as much as reason.
2) The negative assessment of emotions by some Christians is unjustified.
3) The remedy for being led astray by emotions is not to distrust emotions, but to develop the right emotions.
4) Christians should cultivate emotions as much as they do commitment and right action.
5) Having the right emotions is necessary for discovering certain truths.
6) We are not just rational animals, but emotional animals as well.Read more ›
I am always game for new takes and approaches to Christian apologetics, and this one certainly fits the bill. While most such books build arguments around sheer fact and reason, Williams argues that there is also good reason (no pun intended) to defend the Christian worldview on a basis of need and emotion.
He points out that some people approach religion and faith in God emphasizing reason (rationalists) while others do so emphasizing emotion and need (emotionalists). Williams argues that rather than an "either/or" approach, we should take a "both/and" approach. Even on it's face this argument makes sense because apologetic arguments based on sheer airtight reason are of no use if the subject does not care about the information or sees no need to believe or accept those arguments. As Williams says,
"My aim is to defend the legitimacy of acquiring faith through need, emotion and reason. Satisfaction of need legitimately draws us to faith, but reason must be involved in this drawing. More simply, the two basic ideas of the book are the drawing power of need and the certifying ability of reason. Need without reason is blind, but reason without need is sterile."
I find it just a little ironic that he makes his argument throughout the book on the basis of rationality, but then again, his reasons would have no power if they did not awaken a desire to respond to such reason.Read more ›
Williams apparently has two main tasks in the book: 1) To dismantle the notion that faith is all mental assent; 2) To dismantle the notion that emotionalism equals faith. His overarching purpose is to show that "the ideal way to acquire faith in God is through both need and reason, and that faith should consist of both emotion and assent" (12). Indeed, he encourages the reader to recognize that this is a "middle-of-the-road" argument, emphasizing rationalism and emotionalism as proper ways of acquiring faith when used together.
It is in this vein that Williams' book should be accepted well and thought through critically. As one who has fallen into both traps at times in my life, I agree with Williams' overarching understanding of faith as both need and reason.
Before anyone jumps the gun, let me remind you that Williams' is not primarily arguing that needs prove to us in a sort of evidence way that God exists but that they provide justification for those that do believe in his existence. Williams puts the distinction as such: "The evidential argument tries to support the existence of God by showing that God's existence is needed to explain how people got those needs, whereas the existential argument tries to show that we can justifiably have faith in God solely because it satisfies the needs" (43). Indeed, "the existential argument does not give evidence for thinking God exists.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Existential Reasons for Belief in God provides a compelling case for the role of needs, desires and emotions in belief. Read morePublished on February 28, 2012 by Greg Smith (aka sowhatfaith)