26 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A Disappointment, November 28, 2007
This book has a bit of personal history. We were in Michigan, at a Borders, when I overhead a couple of women talking about it. The reason they were buying it? Their church told them not to. That piqued my interest, as well as the "50% off" sticker that was affixed to the cover.
The Expected One, by Kathleen McGowan, begins with a woman writing a passage in "The Gospel of Mary Magdalene" in the year 72 AD. It flashes forward nineteen hundred years to a murder and a woman experiencing visions. It is the woman with the visions, Maureen Paschal, that this novel centers. Maureen is researching a new book on Mary Magdalene, and her travels take her from Jerusalem to the south of France. It is in France that she learns that she could the The Expected One, the one that will locate the lost gospel of Mary. These lost writings will reveal Mary's love affair with Jesus, her role in early Christianity, details on her children (some from her marriage to Jesus), and a first person account of the crucifixion. As you might expect, there are those that do not want the gospel found and want to stop Maureen and her associates.
There is a lot of background in this novel, as McGowan weaves in passages from "The Gospel of Mary Magdalene" and Maureen's visions. The early portions of the book seemed to unfold slowly (thus, it took a few starts and stops to get me back to reading) but the second half of the book really picked up. I thought that there were quite a few loose ends, but I now see that this book is intended to be the first part of a trilogy. Good thing. I didn't understand why McGowan introduced some fanatical elements, only to discard them midway through the book. Perhaps they were there as placeholders for what is to come. Also, some other loose ends were neatly wrapped up at the end, which didn't really make sense after the build-up. Again, I expect that McGowan will expand upon those parts in a later novel.
Take the time to read the Afterword, as it provides the reader with additional information on McGowan's extensive research, and thoughts, that ended in the writing of this book. And it isn't everyday that you read the Acknowledgements and find a "Thank You" to Jackson Browne.
Overall, if it wasn't that it was 50% off and some people were told not to read it, I never would have picked it up. And the fact that it took me so long to get through it, tells me that it is a book that I wouldn't recommend. However, now that I have started her trilogy, I will have to find out how it all ends. So, McGowan has pulled me into her orbit. But the next books will come from the library.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
31 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
What if, January 4, 2007
This book brings forth some interesting questions, but I can't help wonder if it would get as much attention if it wasn't in that 'Da Vinci Code' mode, throwing intrigue, mystery, secret societies, and oh, yeah, for added spice, a chosen woman to unlock the gospel of Mary Magdalene.
It's OK, but without the potential for controversy I doubt it would get as much attention.
Finding out it was originally self-published kind of throws a wrench into the machinery.
The writing isn't that great, and the author seems, to me, to have trouble finding her voice, and just tosses in details to explain stuff, instead of revealing them or showing them to the reader via actual storytelling, and the added adverbs bug me personally, where she'd write, 'she smelled the gloriously rich red roses,' which is too fiction 101 for me, it's like she's telling you you're there, instead of transporting you there via good prose.
Also, she'll mention something happening, then throw in a sentence right after it to explain those details even more, like a sentence and then a footnote sentence following it. I won't get into whether it's right or wrong to write that way, but I don't care for it myself.
Don't read on if you don't want spoilers:
In the framework of the story, the main character, Maureen Paschal, who is a writer, is fascinated by historical women like Marie Antoinette and Mary Magdalene. Maureen ends up being invited to the home of this wealthy Scotsman, Sinclair Berenger, in France. Berenger is the head of this secret Magdalene society, and they have hopes of Maureen being 'the expected one,' to unlock the key to get to the Magdalene gospel. Maureen is special because she has visions of Mary Magdalene, and is of Jesus-Mary's bloodline. Of course they find the book-gospel, and Maureen's cousin Peter, conveniently versed in Greek, does a rough translation of it, and Magdalene's story unfolds. Other complications ensue, but it's not really that climactic, as far as I'm concerned, and it seems to lack the dramatic arc most stories have.
McGowan has Mary Magdalene marry John the Baptist, though she is originally betrothed to Jesus. But politicking basically throws a monkey wrench into the arrangements. John then he gets beheaded, and due to misunderstandings, Mary and Salome get trashed in history, but of course this discovered gospel of Magdalene reveals her side of the story. After John is beheaded, Mary marries Jesus and they have a couple of kids, and then she is chosen to be his first disciple, to carry on his word after he is crucified. The gospels are revealed and some mysteries unraveled. Then when it seems like it's resolved (sort of -- there are a few complications via the church), Maureen has a dream of Jesus and is instructed to find his 'Book of Love,' and it's set up for a sequel.
The research seems pretty solid: There are a few theories (let's just stick to that word) that Magdalene was married to John, and eventually to Jesus, and that Jesus presumably cured Mary Magdalene of 'seven devils' is given a different take here -- using his healing powers to cure her of a deadly eastern poison. You get a bit of Pontius Pilate's story, Salome's and other biblical/historical characters' sides of the story. I'm no bible expert, but I went and looked some stuff up as I was reading this, and she's mostly working on theories that are out there, and building on them. It's good food for thought, but again, I wish the story contained a bit more drama, and was better written. Maybe the sequel will be more showing, less telling.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No