• List Price: $150.00
  • Save: $25.05 (17%)
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
+ $3.99 shipping
Used: Like New | Details
Sold by lewispublishers
Condition: Used: Like New
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $8.71
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Theism and Explanation (Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion) Hardcover – April 2, 2009

ISBN-13: 978-0415997386 ISBN-10: 0415997380 Edition: 1st

Buy New
Price: $124.95
11 New from $123.39 11 Used from $48.95
Rent from Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
$123.39 $48.95
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student

Frequently Bought Together

Theism and Explanation (Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion) + The Historical Jesus Question: The Challenge of History to Religious Authority
Price for both: $147.04

Buy the selected items together
Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion (Book 6)
  • Hardcover: 222 pages
  • Publisher: Routledge; 1 edition (April 2, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0415997380
  • ISBN-13: 978-0415997386
  • Product Dimensions: 0.8 x 6.2 x 9.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,531,338 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews


Gregory Dawes' Theism and Explanation is a competent, nuanced look at the nature and scope of theistic explanations.  Dawes argues that theistic explanations can in principle be good explanations, but he also argues that they have to meet a high bar to count as good explanations. ... The result is an interesting and insightful look at what it takes to be a successful theistic explanation.
-Bradley Monton, University of Colorado at Boulder, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

About the Author

Gregory W. Dawes is Associate Professor of Religious Studies at the University of Otago. He is the author of The Historical Jesus Question: The Challenge of History to Religious Authority.

More About the Author

Greg gained his first graduate degree at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome before returning to New Zealand to complete a PhD in Biblical Studies at the University of Otago. He has more recently completed a second PhD, in the Philosophy of Religion, and now teaches in both Religion and Philosophy. Having two young daughters, Anna and Kathryn, he is continually reminded of the truth of Quine's remark that the major questions of philosophy are asked by age five.

Greg is currently working on a new book entitled After Copernicus: Religion, Science, and Magic in Early Modern Europe.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 12 people found the following review helpful By Nolan on September 29, 2011
Format: Hardcover
In his book, Gregory Dawes looks at whether the idea of God works as a successful explanation.

Dawes begins by carefully defending his controversial stance that there are no in principle objections to positing God as an explanation. In doing so, he directly confronts the idea that supernatural explanations in general, and theistic explanations specifically, are outside of the scope of science. Instead, Dawes argues, if we take it that God will act rationally to create an optimally good world, we have a hypothesis that is testable and falsifiable in principle, well within the scope of science, and thus worthy of consideration as a possible explanation.

Now it seems at first that Dawes, in his defense of God as a potential explanation, would be very sympathetic to God as a successful explanation. Instead, Dawes points out that even if God might potentially explain things, in every criteria we use to evaluate a successful explanation, God does very poorly.

When examined in light of "testability", whenever theists do posit testable accounts of God, theism tends to fail those tests. In light of "background knowledge," a disembodied, timeless being goes against our established knowledge of humans as embodied, finite, and temporally limited. In light of "past success", naturalistic explanations have been wildly successful, with supernatural explanations never reaching any success whatsoever. The theistic hypothesis similarly fails in light of explanatory virtues like simplicity, ontological economy, and informativeness.

Unlike many philosophy books, Theism and Explanation is very readable and not prohibitively long, with only 166 pages of text outside of the index, bibliography, and notes.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 34 people found the following review helpful By Bruce Bain on March 16, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Philosopher Gregory Dawes has his most telling argument, when he offers the Logical refuation of Richard Dawkins' argument, in which he proves that Richard Dawkins' "God Hypothesis" exhibits a faulty reasoning.

Gregory Dawes writes:

"Pace Dawkins, it is not a necessary condition of a successful explanation that it can explain its explanans. If we follow my earlier suggestion and assume that explanations are arguments, then an explanation is an argument which has the explanandum as its conclusion. To explain an explosion, for instance, all we need is a description of a leak of gas, coupled with a description of its causal field, and some low-level laws regarding the behaviour of gases. One might argue that a complete explanation would need to cite further laws, which would explain the lower-level laws. Of course, this leads to a regress of explanations, which may or may not have an end. But that doesn't matter, since it is not obligatory. We do not need to have a complete explanation in order to have an explanation."---------- from p. 58 "Theism and Explanation"
(Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Religion) by Gregory w. Dawes, hardcover Edition (Gregor Dawes has Ph. D. in "Biblical Studies" and another in "The Philosophy of Religion"

"Similar questions may be raised about the 'in principle' objection made by Dawkins: the idea that religious explanations are unacceptable because they leave unexplained the existence of their explanans (God). Dawkins apparently assumes that every successful explanation should also explain its own explanans. But this is an unreasonable demand. Many of our most successful explanations raise new puzzles and present us with new questions to be answered.
Read more ›
153 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again