Throughout the 20th century, communism and democratic capitalism provided the primary models for economic development. Between the two, dictatorships often flourished, plundering countries for the benefit of the few. At the end of the 20th century, the gap between the wealthiest and poorest countries seems to have grown.
Aristide is the former elected president of Haiti, who was ousted by a coup d'etat in 1991. He and the Haitian democracy were restored with UN help in 1994. Now a private citizen, he shares his views in this book as to how to improve the circumstances for the people of Haiti in a democratic context.
I do not know enough about Haiti to know about the accuracy of his statements about the history of this country. His basic point is that free markets have tended to impoverish the agricultural sector, the historical strength of Haiti. This occurred through reducing tariffs on rice, so that subsidized U.S. rice drove out local Haitian farmers. Prices rose again after the farmers had lost their farms. Then a disease among local swine led to these animals being slaughtered. The replacement swine from Iowa were ill-suited to Haiti, and this source of food and income was lost as well.
Aristide points out that the Haitians are very good about sharing and caring for each other, even when they have very little. The country has an 85 percent illiteracy rate, 80 percent of the people drink substandard water, there is not enough water for farm irrigation, and 70 percent are unemployed. Crowding in poor areas is so extreme that people sleep in shifts.
Aristide believes in democracy, but feels that it must also have literacy, clean water, and food to sustain it. He also points out that you have to break down the barriers of class and prejudice to unite people in helping one another. Since leaving office he has supported private initiatives for tutoring adult illiterates, establishing free universities, lending to poor people in groups of five (along the lines of the Gameen bank model), and improving access to clean water. He also works on symbolic changes like having young children speak on their own radio shows, inviting people of all classes to swim in his swimming pool (in a country where most have never seen a pool), and greeting one and all with respect and caring.
Basically, his model follows the immigrant society approach that worked so well in the United States in the late 19th century. Similar methods worked well in India during the Gandhi regime after independence.
As encouraging and heart-warming as the model is, it does need further development. Haiti needs to develop a world-class advantage in some area of economic activities. Based on his description of the country, the obvious possibilities are not too many. Essentially, light manufacturing, software development, doing back office tasks for U.S. companies on an overnight basis, specialty agriculture or horticulture, and specialized banking are the choices. Language differences (most Haitians speak either French or a local variation thereof) will be a limiting factor.
A second need for this model is that Haitians should attract business partners from the developing and the developed world who will have an economic and heart-felt interest in assisting with Mr. Aristide's approach. Haitians have been successful in attacting Catholic visitors to understand the country's problems, so perhaps businesses owned by Catholics could be a good place to start.
A third need for this model is to create nonprofit organizations that do not yet exist that span across national lines. Habitat for Humanity could be a good model, but the context needs to be in literacy (especially to learn English, the language of international business and science, as well as French), development of water resources, and reestablishing competitive local agriculture. Volunteers from the developed and developing countries would create the organizational structure and provide the seed capital, and then work as partners with Haitians to assist the Haitians in helping themselves. The U.S. immigrants frequently had help from groups similar to this with the development of their literacy in English at the beginning of the 20th century from American-born people.
My sense is also that there needs to be a study of what the future best practices can be for using private initiative (for profit and not for profit) to assist countries like Haiti. For example, if the Gameen-style banks (lending small amounts to small entrepreneurs, guaranteed by fellow entrepreneurs) are so successful, why not raise capital to start more of them using pools of funds that already exist in the United States and elsewhere?
Mr. Aristide has raised a very useful question and potential answer in this book. I hope it will encourage you and others to think about how to create even better answers. In supporting our fellow citizens of the world, we can all make a difference in improving the quality of caring in our lives and in the quality of life in theirs. What a profound opportunity to exercise our imaginations and our caring! As these people are able to contribute more for themselves, we will all benefit from their ideas and their energy.
As de Tocqueville pointed out during his visit to the United States, what makes our democracy work so well are the effective efforts of private citizens to do the public good. Mr. Aristide makes a good case for exporting this part of our democratic model through our own actions, as well.
Overcome your misconception stall that most of the world must always live in poverty!