1.0 out of 5 stars
Shoot over the bar. Don't read this!, March 5, 2010
First of all the only review of this book on Amazon entered "December 30, 1998" is done
by someone who hasn't read the book and doesn't even guess right about its content.
This is about the history of FIFA and associated confederations (uefa, caf...)
through the reigns of its main presidents (Rimet, Rous, Havelange...).
I will save you the pain of reading it.
The most importants facts I have learned by doing so are:
- The president of FIFA as almost dictatorial powers (including huge weight in choosing world cup hosts)
- The aliance with coca cola and Adidas in the 70's as given FIFA the finance for the developement of the game as
we know it in exchange for giving coca cola intrance in dificult markets like China, USSR. (Having Coca Cola distributed in the host country of a FIFA tournament is compulsary).
- During the cold war, club football in eastern europe was one of the only forms of
contest against russia and the soviet power.
- FIFA is one big ruthless political organisation
- football generates more money than any huge company (general motors ect...)
- The combinaison of a huge political power (for example helping to recognise a country, legitimating a regime ect...)
financial power (exponent of globalisation, sponsors, tv ect...) unequaled world wide apeal make it a magnet
for the most unsavory and powerfull characters.
- On the positive side it has enormous healing and togetherness powers which are far superior
to many humanitarian organisation and somethimes used greatly.
I wouldn't have read this book if I had known... Instead of being a really informative text
on the administration of football it is turned into the most pompous, pretentious Academic pile of bore.
Do you remember how school managed to put you off incredibly interesting stuff like, reading, history and
sience? This manages to make a football book inacessible and incredibly boring just by its style.
A couple of academics peacocks prefering to look o' so clever rather than transmiting their
prety good knowledge of an area that is so unknown to the average fan like me.
I will now leave you with a splendid example of this... Style... Good night.
"Robertson has argued that an historical, comparative and interdisciplinary social science framework
can be developed if social theory is refocused and expanded so as to make concern with 'the world' a
central hemeuneutic, and in such a way as to constrain empirical and comparative-historical research in the
same direction."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No