| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
27 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating,
By
This review is from: The Failures Of Integration: How Race and Class Are Undermining the American Dream (Hardcover)
Some of you may wonder why I, being a white Brit with conservative political beliefs, should be interested in a book about racial issues in America. It's quite simple, really - Britain, like America, is a multi-racial society in which the different races sometimes have difficulty relating to each other and this is a good way to understand some of what black people think of whites and how the differences can be overcome. While there are differences between Britain and America, there are also plenty of similarities. I do not agree with everything here but I never expected to. To be honest, the book is far better -and more constructive - than I dared hope.Sheryll Cashin, the author, is clearly a highly intelligent lady who has done a lot of research for this book. She presents her case well and it is, at times, uncomfortable reading for white readers, just as I expected, though it is also clear that she recognizes that progress needs the co-operation of the white community, so she is careful in her use of language. Furthermore, she acknowledges that black people have some of the same faults. In this way, she can reasonably hope to win support for her case from at least some white people. She presents a lot of facts as well as opinions presented as facts. One of the opinions that are presented as fact is fundamental to her philosophy. This is a forecast that the white majority will disappear this century in America and that by 2100 whites will only make up forty percent of the population - still the largest ethnic group but not a majority. This forecast may prove to be accurate but it may not. By persistently stating it as a fact rather than a forecast, Sheryll damages her case slightly. Sheryll mainly focuses on housing although schools are also given a fair bit of coverage. She scarcely mentions business or cultural situations. Furthermore, she only looks at what is happening in America. It would have been useful to compare the American experience with what is happening in Europe, where there is also a white majority, and with Africa, where there is a black majority. Sheryll complains that white people like to live in areas that are predominately white, yet acknowledges that black people like to live in areas that are predominately black. She wants us all to live amongst each other - no white areas, no black areas (actually, she concedes that a few enclaves might be OK, even useful) - but explains why she won't be an integration pioneer (her term for a black person going to live in a white area). All this explains why areas that somehow manage to become mixed generally don't stay mixed - eventually one race becomes a minority and moves out unless there is a strong sense of community. Sheryll does, however, draw one clear distinction, claiming that black people are accustomed to (and therefore comfortable) being a minority among whites, yet white people are uncomfortable being in a minority among blacks. This may well be true (at least for some whites), but this is where research in Africa would have been useful - it would have revealed whether it is a white problem or a majority race problem. I will say that the only time I was in a white minority was on a training course. It lasted several weeks but although I was surprised at first (it was a new experience for me), I quickly got used to it and I never had any problems with any of the black people I met there - indeed, some of them were wonderful. Sheryll's wish for all areas to be mixed (which she concedes is a Utopian ideal) might be attainable in the long term but she acknowledges that it could not be imposed - it must be achieved by persuasion. My instinct is that this will be easier to achieve by focusing on schools and work first. If whites and blacks get used to each other in these aspects of life, then eventually they will be happier to live amongst each other. This may take a couple of generations or more. Sheryll is clearly of the opinion that housing is central and points to local action in various places that have yielded results. However, what makes Sheryll's solution completely unworkable is that she wants to break down all class barriers, inextricably linking class, wealth and race. She does not like the concept of people living in the best area they can afford, thus creating exclusive areas that are thereby out of the range of most people. Unfortunately for Sheryll, this type of segregation has existed from the earliest days of civilization as we recognize it, even in single-race communities, and I can't see that it's never going to change. Linking class issues with race issues undermines her case totally. Despite my misgivings, this book is compulsive reading and everybody can learn a lot from it. If your political beliefs are similar to Sheryll's, you may yearn for her proposed solution, but even if you're a white conservative like me, it is useful to get a glimpse of the black perspective on racial issues. Regardless of your racial group or political beliefs, I have no hesitation in recommending this book.
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Describing the Costs of "Voluntary" Segregation,
By Donald Mitchell "Jesus Loves You!" (Thanks for Providing My Reviews over 110,000 Helpful Votes Globally) - See all my reviews (VINE VOICE) (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER) (TOP 100 REVIEWER)
This review is from: The Failures Of Integration: How Race and Class Are Undermining the American Dream (Hardcover)
You don't need to read this book to know that the United States remains a highly segregated nation, especially its African-American citizens. What will probably shock you is to learn how hard it is to find a neighborhood where the population is reasonably integrated. Professor Cashin lives in such a neighborhood and helps the rest of to see what we are missing in our not very integrated neighborhoods.Naturally, I expected the book to outline the problems that African-Americans face as a result such as poorer educations, fewer job opportunities, more exposure to crime and few cultural choices. And of course the book correctly spells out those problems. The book also describes that there are economic burdens for even middle class African-Americans because their neighborhoods are often close to poor African-American neighborhoods . . . and the costs spill over. There is a remarkable discussion of Washington, D.C. and its suburbs that makes all of these details tangible. What makes this a remarkable book that adds new fuel to the debate in favor of integration is that Professor Cashin makes a compelling argument that those who are not African-Americans are paying a high economic price for living apart. These costs include higher real estate prices, longer commutes, higher prices for basic goods and services and higher taxes to pay for the social ills that follow from African-American poverty. In addition, families pay a higher cost by having parents and children be apart for more hours in the day. Professor Cashin points out that a central flaw in the way we all live our lives is to seek out the very best neighborhoods to raise our children in . . . a natural instinct among all parents. In pursuing that instinct, we often fail to look at the alternatives such as living in a good neighborhood where our cost of living will be 1/3 less so that one parent doesn't have to work. We also miss the chance for our children to become better prepared for the multicultural world that lies ahead. Professor Cashin has done her homework, and she makes a number of novel suggestions for how to overcome our bias towards living in segregated communities. The only weakness I found in the work was her extreme emphasis on parents and their young children. The last time I looked, fewer than 10 percent of all U.S. households had two parents and children under 18 in them. Clearly, looking out for children isn't the only reason people live in segregated areas. I think part of the missing argument is how much more profitable it is to prepare for retirement by owning a home in a sought-after community. But I know lots of people who want to move into more interesting areas after their children are grown. They would seem like good candidates to look into the benefits of living in integrated neighborhoods. School funding is a national shame. That problem needs to be overcome. All children need to have the chance to develop their talents in safe schools and neighborhoods. We are making a huge mistake if we don't fix this problem.
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
a social analysis of the highest importance,
This review is from: The Failures Of Integration: How Race and Class Are Undermining the American Dream (Paperback)
I had the experience of seeing Prof. Cashin summarize her book in person. I found her approach very shrewd. First, she reviewed her own options and rationale for choosing where to buy a house in Washington. Then she cited studies on people's racial preference in housing patterns. Then she moved from subjective attitudes to "objective" political-economic realities and the policies behind them. She outlined a ratings system ranking the quality and hence real estate value of types of neighborhoods from the very top to the very bottom, which do not reflect the subjective whims of homebuyers but the value set by business. At the top are exclusively white, affluent neighborhoods. The key issue here is not the affluence, but the fact that the desirability of a well-off neighborhood is indicated by its (white) racial homogeneity. She segued to the cost of segregation to whites. Their upward mobility is also affected by this hierarchy, because the "desirable" all-white neighborhoods become so expensive that most middle class whites can't afford them and are thereby relegated to a lower social status. The prescription is policy that supports safe, desirable neighborhoods with mixed race and income levels, of which there are some model examples. Whites will also materially benefit from not having to live in a situation where every move they make is dominated by fear of blacks. Cashin emphasized her book's title's claims that there have been failures to achieve the stated goal of integration, not that integration is a failure. She is pro-integration, and is concerned about the practical measures to make it a reality and not merely pay lip service to the ideal. "Integration" should not be considered an old-fashioned word from the early '60s.To some extent the nature of the audience response was split by race. The blacks tended to emphasize the artificiality of racial separation, how little sense it makes, and how odd America's de facto racial segregation seems from outside the United States and how alike all Americans seem to foreigners. The whites, most of whom were well-meaning and very anxious to redress the problem, had different sorts of comments and questions. Cashin clearly dissociated herself from appeals to white guilt either promoted or criticized by certain white people in the room, emphasizing that she did not play blame games either in her talk nor in her book. I commended Cashin for her approach, beginning with the subtitle of her book (race and class) and proceeding from the subjective and objective sides of residential patterns, which ultimately determine so much. I argued that the mass media and popular culture and everyday interaction send mixed messages: on the one hand popular culture encourages integration; on the other, it too often rigidly reinforces stereotypes. People are much more accepting these days of one another at the workplace and in casual interactions in public, but then they go home to separate neighborhoods and don't socialize with one other outside of work. And then there is the true test of integration: intermarriage, and the reactions of one's relatives to interracial couplings. This society is full of contradictions. There is a failure of imagination: no one has the foresight to grasp the implications of integration, which, if the barriers between people were removed once and for all, would radically alter _everyone's_ conception of identity. My comments--especially my phrase "failure of imagination"--really moved Prof. Cashin and several audience members. And if you care about this society's future, make this book a top priority.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|