Buy New
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
Want it Monday, April 21? Order within and choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

False Alarm: Global Warming -- Facts Versus Fears Paperback

Amazon Price New from Used from Collectible from
"Please retry"
$23.50 $19.38

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought


Up to 50% Off Earth Sciences Books
For a limited time, enjoy special savings on earth sciences titles from Springer. Learn more

Product Details

  • Paperback: 382 pages
  • Publisher: Spring Bay Press (May 3, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0986486205
  • ISBN-13: 978-0986486203
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.5 x 0.8 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 15.2 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,994,927 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Cristina Adams on May 2, 2012
Format: Paperback
This is my moms account, but she got me this book, so I am writing a review (this is her son).

The last review was bogus, I have the book it was printed by the spring bay press not the CATO institute. Further, I have gone to skeptical, very biased and its resources and arguments fall short to disprove the book. The sources that website use are just as biased as they can get. That website does not even touch the book when coming to level of.... potency in arguments. MacRae wins.

O.K., now for the book. Great stuff, disproves the common data we see (hockey stick data) the nasas sources etc. He really shows that the actual data global warming is is mainly computer predictions, and the actual empirical data is NOT on their side. Further, he shows the temperatures we are seeing today ARE NOT ABNORMAL, and are actually right on schedule. It really thoroughly debunks the CO2 claim, and shows global warming more natural then anything. No other source I have seen refutes this data without dodging the point of the argument. Good book.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Dr. Edward R. Swart on January 31, 2011
Format: Paperback
Review of False Alarm by Paul MacRea:

This remarkable book on the shortcomings of the global warming scare deserves to be read as a genuine eye opener by journalists, politicians and citizens at large.
Its excellence is justified by the fact that, although the author is not a scientist but a sociologist and English scholar with extensive experience in the world of editing, reviewing and journalism in general, he has gone to the trouble of gaining an understanding the relevant science in commendable detail. Its significance is further justified by the fact that it is virtually impossible for any reader not to come to the conclusion that there is something seriously wrong with the notion of human caused global warming -- commonly referred to as AGW (anthropogenically caused global warming). Despite not being a scientist MacCrae spent two and and a half years researching the historical, geological, psychological, philosophical, scientific and other relevant disciplines which have a bearing on the AGW hypothesis.
The book is extremely comprehensive. It covers all these aspects of the global warming hypothesis (now misleadingly referred to as climate change and most recently as climate instability).
The earth's climate is ever changing and intrinsically unstable since it is governed by a non-linear chaotic system and this is accepted by all and sundry -- both AGW warmists and AGW skeptics.
The AGW hypothesis is along the lines that that the earth is currently experiencing an unusually rapid and, to some extent, open ended rise in temperature which cannot be explained by natural causes and is due to our burning of fossil fuels and the consequent increase in the CO2 content of the atmosphere.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Mary on January 14, 2012
Format: Paperback
This book is poorly researched. Everyone one of the examples MacRae gives has been thoroughly explained (and debunked) on the website Skeptical Science: [...]

As Skeptical Science puts it:

"Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn't what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that refutes global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?"

Unfortunately, MacRae misses the mark.

But this shouldn't surprise you. This book is published by the Cato Institute, which is famous for spreading mis-information. And why not, that's what their funders like ExxonMobil want.

Since 1998, Exxon has spent upwards of $16 million on a disinformation campaign against global warming whose primary message was that scientists cannot be trusted - a dangerous allegation against the people most responsible for modern society.

Exxon's 2008 Corporate Citizenship Report apologized for the disinformation and promised to withdraw funding from organization spreading mis-information on climate change, which emphasized "uncertainty" in order to sow doubt among the public. But in science, uncertainty is a precise and measurable thing. It doesn't mean that the predictions are inaccurate or unlikely to come true. Indeed something with 90% certainty, is likely going to happen. When there's 90% chance of rain, you grab an umbrella.
Read more ›
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again