Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $7.23
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Farber on Film: The Complete Film Writings of Manny Farber Hardcover – October 1, 2009

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
$20.00 $18.50

Looking for the Audiobook Edition?
Tell us that you'd like this title to be produced as an audiobook, and we'll alert our colleagues at If you are the author or rights holder, let Audible help you produce the audiobook: Learn more at

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 1000 pages
  • Publisher: Library of America; First edition (October 1, 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 159853050X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1598530506
  • Product Dimensions: 6.3 x 1.7 x 9.3 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2.5 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #203,374 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Booklist

*Starred Review* With serious film criticism probably in an inexorable decline due to vanishing venues for publication and the dumbing-down of the moviegoing audience, these writings by the late Farber (1917–2008) constitute a pointed reminder of what will be lost. Farber is best known for championing the B movies of such maverick filmmakers as producer Val Lewton and director Sam Fuller, most notably in a signature 1962 essay in which he excoriated moribund white elephant art and praised the termite art made by eager, eccentric artists, art that goes always forward eating its own boundaries. This long-overdue volume amasses all of Farber’s cinematic writings, from weekly reviews for the New Republic and the Nation in the 1940s and ’50s to wider-ranging essays of the ’60s and ’70s for such specialized publications as Artforum. Throughout, Farber’s iconoclastic viewpoints—he panned The Magnificent Ambersons and Casablanca—and virtuosic prose provide limitless rewards for readers who can negotiate his unexpected intellectual and stylistic turns. The insight and imagination Farber brings to his subjects, whether a Bugs Bunny cartoon or, in his last published film writing, the uncompromising French masterpiece Jeanne Dielman, is an exemplar for criticism of any sort. --Gordon Flagg

About the Author

Robert Polito, editor, is a poet, biographer, and critic whose books include Doubles, Hollywood & God, A Reader's Guide to James Merrill's The Changing Light at Sandover, and Savage Art: A Biography of Jim Thompson, for which he received the National Book Critics Circle Award. He directs the Graduate Writing Program at New School University in New York City. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 5 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

24 of 24 people found the following review helpful By Richard M. Sola on November 30, 2009
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This is a long overdue collection of the complete film writings of one of the great film observers of all time. Manny Farber was much, much more than a film critic. He looked, really looked, at films in ways that no one else did during the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. He dissected films with a painter's eye, seeing what most everyone else missed. He looked at tough guy low budget movies. He looked at Hollywood big production films. He looked at foreign films and experimental films. He looked at cartoons.

And then he wrote. Farber wrote in a way that no one else did.

Farber started writing in the 1940s. His early reviews are still interesting as starting points before seeing the films he discusses. He had an uncanny knack for separating the fluff from substance and stopping great films and great directors long before others did (Hawks, Preston Sturges, Sam Fuller, Fassbinder, Herzog, and Michael Snow to name a few directors Farber championed). And he moved past mere plot summary and analysis to reviewing films in a whole new way.

This collection lets the reader watch Farber grow over time in his understanding of movies and in his writing. By the 1960s, he is writing essays(like his famous and influential "White Elephant Art vs. Termite Art). His later collaboration with Patricia Patterson, an artist and Farber's wife, resulted in pieces that are never short of brilliant.

Farber is at his best when he is pulling and pushing the reader through a maze of thoughts, imagines and word gymnastics to come out the other end of the essay with a whole new way of looking at things. To say that he is non-linear in this thought process is an understatement. Only a great writer like Farber can pull it off.
Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful By Steiner VINE VOICE on July 23, 2010
Format: Hardcover
Manny Farber has been described as the most interesting of American film critics, and although I still prefer Kael and Rosenbaum this volume of collected works is a testament to his unique contribution to the practice of film criticism. In this collection, we finally get the early Farber-his dismissal of bloated epics and self-aggrandizement has true resonance today. Unlike the majority of film commentators, Farber identifies Orson Welles' influence as ultimately nefarious-Farber preferred the 'termite' qualities of a Hawks, a Sturgess, a Mann than the white elephant art of Welles, Hitchcock, and Wilder. However, it is definitely the case that Farber's particular aesthetic was not as interesting as the way he conveyed it-with wandering, almost free-associational digressions and metaphoric gymnastics he could paint the film in a whole new light. It's particulalry interesting to see this method applied to the deified masters of film-to Bergman and Fellini, et al. One cannot help that there is an overly critical mind at work here, yet Farber's approach was not to rank, to argue, or even really to valorize at the end of the day. He was interested in the impressions of the work. It's interesting to see his tone develop, from the wry witticisms in the 40's to the more open and appreciative voice of the 70's, where he began to champion directors like Godard, Fassbinder, and Snow. I cannot say that he had the same desire to truly understand the breadth of film in the way that our contemporary Rosenbaum does, nor did his prose sing in the way that Kael's did, yet his unique way of seeing and transmitting immediate aesthetic impressions was a singular contribution.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By R. Ross on January 29, 2013
Format: Hardcover
I had just found this book on Amazon and have not yet purched it. However, I have long been a fan of Farber and wanted to add some more positive comments to encoutage readers to discover one of the most original film critics America has ever produced.

Schopenhauer advised students not to let their teachers read their Kant for them. Unfortunately, many filmgoers do let their favorite critics watch their films for them. Many critics want to be authorities. Farber resists the regimenting of film experience and film tastes. He communicates the act and process of watching a film. I have learned more from him than any other film critic.

I discovered Farber when the anthology Negative Space was first published. At that time, Andrew Sarris was dominating the film scene in New York and possibly around the country. Sarris originized everything by cataloging good and bad director, major and minor films of each director, and a major and minor films by year. This game leads to people talking about films in broad categories rather than talking intelligently about what actually makes a film tick.

Farber probably will never gain the large following of critics who are looking for prestige but he deserves a wider audience simply because his much needed type of iconoclasm and his gifts of seeing each film anew might rub off on others.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Daryl Chin on September 18, 2011
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This collection is supposed to be definitive, and it is (in the sense of collecting all of Manny Farber's film writings from the multitude of sources throughout his career, from The Nation and The New Republic in the 1940s, all the way to articles from Artforum and Film Comment in the 1960s and 1970s). But one problem was that in many of the original journals, the editing was sloppy, and there were mistakes, which have simply not been corrected and have simply been perpetuated into the future, as the Library of America continues its slipshod methodology of never having to say it's sorry. Mistakes and important omissions. For example: in a review of the experimental films of the Kinesis group from San Francisco, Farber mentions a filmmaker named "Gordon Belson". There has never been a "Gordon Belson", the name is JORDAN Belson (who just died in August of 2011). This mistake was made in the original review in The Nation of October 11, 1952; it should have been corrected, but how can it be corrected when the editors don't know this is a mistake? For example: in the introduction and the chronology, it is never mentioned that "Manny Farber's" name is Emanuel Farber. An entire book of over 800 pages, and there is no mention (at all) of Mr. Farber's actual name. What kind of editing is this? Aside from that, this is an exhilarating collection, because Manny Farber is one of the most iconoclastic and amusing critics the movies have ever had, a true original.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?