| ||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Oddly enough, I read this on my treadmill.,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Fat Boys: A Slim Book (Hardcover)
This is strong cultural studies. Gilman's purpose is to show that for centuries in the West, issues of obesity and masculinity have worked hand in hand. He looks at Greek philosophy, canonical authors, fictional detectives, baseball players, and modern male stomach staplers to spell out how fat men have been treated and portrayed. What Garber did for bisexuals and Halberstam did for masculine lesbians, Gilman now does for fat men.Constructionists will love this book. Gilman makes a point to show that the chubby are treated differently from the obese. He illustrates how Falstaff transformed from Shakespeare's comedies to Verdi's operas and how Sancho Panza changed over the course of Cervantes' work. In the baseball chapter, fat men are maligned; in the detective chapter, they are praised. Gilman had much more than one thing to say about fat men in Western cultural history. Gilman is juggling many balls here and I have mixed reviews about his results. On the one hand, it's intriguing how he can jump from plays to opera to the law to biography to current events. However, his principle interest is how medical theories affected cultural productions; you'd never guess this from reading the table of contents. And sometimes it just doesn't add up. For example, he states that at the same time that writers were inventing fat detectives that solved crimes with their guts, scientists were describing the importance of fat cells. Still, he never truly explains that or if the latter caused the former. The subtitle of this book is purposeful: Gilman is quite cognizant that he is only scratching the surface on fat men. He avoids Eurocentricity by restricting his analysis to "the West." I sincerely hope that this book will encourage other scholars to write on fat men in the Muslim world, Asia, or pre- and postcolonial Latin America. Still, there's so much that Gilman left out of the picture. Though I doubt he's homophobic, I disliked that he never once brought up the bear movement, especially when it would have been easy to do so in his last chapter. He makes scant mention of sumo wresters and Al Roker, but besides that you almost never hear about men of color (including those in the West). When I flipped through the index and saw "Fat Joe," I assumed he meant the chunky Latino rapper, not some Dickens character. Further, rap is the standout cultural arena where fat men (most of whom are of color) have made a positive name for themselves (examples include Biggie Smalls and Big Pun) yet Gilman hardly gives them a sentence. What up wit dat?! To his credit, he does a great job in being inclusive of fat Jewish men, however. This book can be depressing to "swallow" as a fat male reader. Is it any consolation to find that for centuries Westerners have considered fat men to be lazy, stupid, immoral, and shameful? When Gilman looks at how fat becomes a proxy of other traits, he mostly focuses on short lifespans. I think a better look at other dynamics would have been more interesting. Lastly, and of least important, fitness lovers may hate this book. Gilman does little to admit that obesity is a health hazard. His focus on representation does not touch valid issues that too much weight can be dangerous. I am so glad that Gilman wrote this book and that I found it. I'm just not all the way impressed after finishing it.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|