Fat Man and Little Boy
|Additional DVD options||Edition||Discs||
|New from||Used from|
|Watch Instantly with||Rent||Buy|
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
A more accurate movie is "Day One", at least as far as the plot goes, but even that fails to grasp the Manhattan Project's scope. The best film on it, which unfortunately no longer exists, was "The Beginning or the End" which was made in 1946 (Brian Donlevy played Groves). The main people on the project served as technical advisors for that one. Unfortunately, that was never put on video and probably rotted away in some warehouse.
So many issues, creativity, authority, diplomacy,secrecy, espionage, urgency...all provide the natural elements to a serious, gripping story. But this screenplay chooses to throw in silly romantic subplots, and alter the facts in the service of their silly Hollywood formula.Ughh. Especially annoying is the distortion of the circumstances surrounding the lab accident that befell Louis Slotkin, the Canadian, now morphed into a hybrid romantic figure in this puerile reworking of history. Maybe someday, someone will do the subject justice in a dramatic structure, until then the excellent documentary, 'The Day After Trinity' will have to suffice.
The screenplay illustrates the powerlessness of acting talent in the face of poor writing. Unfortunately, and maybe this is an inevitable remark, the film ends with a whimper, not a bang.
The scientist Michael Merriman (actually a composite of a few real-life characters; try looking up "Louis Slotin" in your favorite search engine) asks whether it is more instinctive in humans to save life or to destroy it. This becomes one of the central themes of the film. Merriman twice heroically saves the lives of others, but the second time receives a lethal exposure to radiation himself in the process. I have read comments in other reviews that Merriman's (fictional) romance with a nurse at the base hospital was unnecessary and too contrived, but I think that this sort of dramatic element helps provide an emotional context for the bomb's direct and indirect victims; also, Merriman's ultimately tragic romance parallels that of Oppenheimer with his "security-risk" mistress.
This film touches on many of the issues of the creation of the atomic bomb: the logistical challenges, the personal and moral and political challenges. These multiple issues are treated more or less equally, and none is really treated in depth at the expense of the others. Some viewers may regard this lack of depth as a liability, but I think the overall balance is good.
The dramatic quality (acting, writing, etc.) of the film is also generally good, with a few faults.Read more ›
Most Recent Customer Reviews
I thought this was a love story with fireworks at the end, boy was i wrong. Best part is they shut cusack up, boy that guy cant act his way out of a cardboard box.Published 9 days ago by Robert C. Henderson
Good educational film for the most part, there were some characters that were misrepresented and lacked a bit of personality. Enjoyed the presentation of the events.Published 13 days ago by MLively
Terrible, faux history with unnecessary and unhistorical characters and plot lines. Avoid. if you are interested in a far more realistic and detailed account of the Manhattan... Read morePublished 1 month ago by Nathaniel R. Brown
This story, though very interesting, has been much better told elsewhere. A very dated film, stilted and clumsy compared to the newer Manhatten series. Read morePublished 1 month ago by Consuela
Some intersection with actual history, but this struck me as mostly pulp fiction.Published 2 months ago by Tim Tillson
Poor disc quality could not play the full movie to date no offer to make the problem rightPublished 3 months ago by John Gerlach