7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Tribal Art, October 18, 2000
By A Customer
This review is from: Feast: Poems (Hardcover)
A slow beginning to the book, and to some degree, it rings with that American, competitive, referential, historo-hype you get from great foreign writers who, all of the sudden, find themselves in Radio City Poetry Hall because the academy-entrenched poets feel obliged/committed to placing medals on them and getting them BIGHOUSE publications for their profound simplicity and historical signifincance despite whether or not they truly beleive in them and their art. Salamun is a tribal artist, the only kind of artist, and I know that what I instinctually feel is missing from half the poems is his inability to take greater risks, to do what he does best--- to leave the world of poetry in its mess of political debris and sing without question the mystery of objectivity and the beauty of discovering the self without self consciousness. His tribe is growing...smaller or larger makes no difference.
Still, Feast is much better than 98% of what we find in the bighouse.
"I", "Bosporus", and "I Smell Horses in Poland" is where he's really present. Don't hesitate in deciding about the book for; "Whoever eats from the Tree of Life loses all his sins"(p.9)
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
"The wound will be a fabulous pool.", July 2, 2008
This review is from: Feast: Poems (Hardcover)
I have no idea what a prior reviewer is referring to when he talks about Salamun finding himself in "Radio City Poetry Hall," or the "BIGHOUSE" (seems the reviewer is caught in his own "referential historo-hype"). Anyway, this is a very satisfying book...for a certain kind of reader.
If you like your poems rational, if you like them unified, if you like or require a coherant voice, elegant arguments, recognizable poetic conventions, traditional tropes, a story or backstory, then you may find yourself frustrated.
Salamun draws from a range of avante-garde traditions (including Rimbaud, Apollinaire, Artaud, the Surrealists, Russian Futurism, Frank O'Hara and the New York School) whose thrust is splitting up the unified poem into shining bits, (sort of like how a mirror is less useful but far more interesting after a baseball is thrown into it).
His poems tend to advance via disconnected or surreally connected images, associative lists, absurd questions and propositions, and an almost arbitrary jotting of events and mental ephemera; some examples:
"Artaud was throwing up, Artaud was killing / himself. I'd like to dance in the disco again."
"On that white paper. Are there / no traces of saliva? Does nothing take leave, / does nothing die? No traces of sea froth?"
"Muzzles kept // falling around thighs like foxes. They solidified / into ceramics. Ceramics are the eyes of cathedrals. Under / the foot of every elephant is an eye. The eye is harder // than the fan. The pheasant covers your // eyes. Its chest is a thick plank.'
"In the heart a bullet, in the bullet an ape, / in the ape a plant, in the plant a mirror."
The delight (my delight at any rate) in reading Salamun is the sudden, often jarring, turns of image and tone and perception, the constantly and elusively changing thought process, the madcap unreliability of the speaker, and the profound terrible and intimate moments that such a speaker can take us to:
"Yesterday was / a midsummer day. A friend's child / died before being born."
"As I walk the town / I notice every prey about to ripen."
"Little hen pigeons are still, / you keep them safe by breathing."
"A field of hounds, of emperors / on horseback, of drowning deer."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No