Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century [Hardcover]

Vaclav Smil (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: April 3, 2000 | ISBN-10: 0262194325 | ISBN-13: 978-0262194327

This book addresses the question of how we can best feed the ten billion or so people who will likely inhabit the Earth by the middle of the twenty-first century. He asks whether human ingenuity can produce enough food to support healthy and vigorous lives for all these people without irreparably damaging the integrity of the biosphere.

What makes this book different from other books on the world food situation is its consideration of the complete food cycle, from agriculture to post-harvest losses and processing to eating and discarding. Taking a scientific approach, Smil espouses neither the catastrophic view that widespread starvation is imminent nor the cornucopian view that welcomes large population increases as the source of endless human inventiveness. He shows how we can make more effective use of current resources and suggests that if we increase farming efficiency, reduce waste, and transform our diets, future needs may not be as great as we anticipate.

Smil's message is that the prospects may not be as bright as we would like, but the outlook is hardly disheartening. Although inaction, late action, or misplaced emphasis may bring future troubles, we have the tools to steer a more efficient course. There are no insurmountable biophysical reasons we cannot feed humanity in the decades to come while easing the burden that modern agriculture puts on the biosphere.

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

Can we do it? Plowing his furrow between the doomsayers and the blind optimists, agriculture researcher Vaclav Smil believes that our planet can sustain more than 10 billion people, and he makes his arguments clearly and plainly in Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century. His prescription is fairly simple: waste less, eat less, and produce more--and he shows just how easy it could be. Just like doctors' advice that the key to losing weight is to eat less and exercise more, which is ignored in favor of simpler and less effective plans, Smil's ideas are just unglamorous enough to fall by the wayside. Why not take the easy way out and decide either that we're all doomed or that market forces will mysteriously solve problems that they have yet to acknowledge exist?

Smil prefers to look coolly at our habits and suggest how we can make moderate changes to our production and consumption and reap great benefits of efficiency--and better health. You won't be surprised to learn that beef takes a beating in the race to convert solar energy to food, but you might not know that pigs and chickens are practically neck and neck. Of course, all of our two- and four-legged friends are eating the dust of the grains and vegetables, proving again that slow and steady wins the race. If Smil's ideas can get the attention they deserve, and if as he says "China could do it," then we ought to be able to look forward to an equitable, sustainable place at the table for everyone, even as our population reaches 11 digits. --Rob Lightner

From Scientific American

Smil's message is that it can be done. He sees "no insurmountable biophysical reasons why we could not feed humanity in decades to come while at the same time easing the burden that modern agriculture puts on the biosphere." For one, "there is a very high probability that humanity will not double in number again, and that its 2050 total of around 10 billion people may be very close to (or perhaps even a bit above) its long-term maximum." Moreover, there is plenty of room for "tightening up the slack in the food system." Smil, professor of geography at the University of Manitoba, regards himself as a Malthusian in the sense expressed by Thomas Robert Malthus--usually seen as asserting that the population will eventually outrun the food supply--in the second, rarely read, edition (1803) of his essay on population: "Though our future prospects respecting the mitigation of the evils arising from the principle of population may not be so bright as we could wish, yet they are far from being entirely disheartening."

EDITORS OF SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 390 pages
• Publisher: The MIT Press (April 3, 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0262194325
• ISBN-13: 978-0262194327
• Product Dimensions: 9.2 x 6.2 x 1.1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.9 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #302,864 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • #66 in Books > Professional & Technical > Professional Science > Agricultural Sciences > History

More About the Author

Vaclav Smil is currently a Distinguished Professor in the Faculty of Environment at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. He completed his graduate studies at the Faculty of Natural Sciences of Carolinum University in Prague and at the College of Earth and Mineral Sciences of the Pennsylvania State University. His interdisciplinary research interests encompass a broad area of energy, environmental, food, population, economic, historical and public policy studies, and he had also applied these approaches to energy, food and environmental affairs of China.

He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada (Science Academy) and the first non-American to receive the American Association for the Advancement of Science Award for Public Understanding of Science and Technology. He has been an invited speaker in more than 250 conferences and workshops in the USA, Canada, Europe, Asia and Africa, has lectured at many universities in North America, Europe and East Asia and has worked as a consultant for many US, EU and international institutions. His wife Eva is a physician and his son David is an organic synthetic chemist.

Official Website: www.vaslavsmil.com

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

17 of 20 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars When to Be Optimistic, August 23, 2000

By 

E. N. Anderson (Riverside, CA USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century (Hardcover)

Smil's book is a "must read" for anyone interested in the world food problem. His most valuable contribution is his insistence, backed up with an unparalleled marshalling of facts, that the biggest hope in the short run lies in greater efficiency. By looking at the whole food cycle, from field to final end, he can show (correctly) that waste all along the line is costing us more than enough food to feed all the hungry AND many of the unborn. Water and fertilizer are lost in the field, grain goes to rats and weevils during storage, and so on down to the appalling plate waste in the US. Smil does not side with the catastrophists who project imminent famine (they have been wrong too often) nor with the cornucopians who see nothing but plenty ahead (he dismisses them with the tart comment that, ultimately, the earth would have to be all grain if food and population kept growing). He is, however, on the optimistic side, seeing existing and fairly easily-developed technology as quite adequate to feed the expected world population. There are some problems. First, he accepts the hopeful premise that world population will level off around 10 billion. In spite of the mantra-like repetition of this figure by aid agencies, it is probably too optimistic. China is barely managing to sustain its one-child policy, and population growth is still rapid in the Middle East, South Asia, Africa, and Latin America; many countries show no sign of slowing. Second, he adopts the most optimistic possible figures or scenarios on soil erosion and some other variables. Desertification, for instance, he ascribes largely to natural climatic swings. This is not credible; there are far too many photographs, from around the world, of desertification that stops short at barbed-wire fences (which prevent overgrazing). On the other hand, he does not say much about minor and obscure crops, and still less about obscure cropping regimes and methods. Use of such technologies (found mostly among traditional peoples around the world) could vastly increase the productivity of world agriculture. One notes, going beyond this book, that some countries today are as badly off as the most pessimistic of catastrophists feared: Sudan, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Mali, and many more. These are countries with weak and usually tyrannical governments, often torn by conflict. Conversely, some countries have done as well as the most cheery optimists could have hoped; these are mostly European countries with strong, democratic governments with high levels of accountability. In between, countries fall neatly into line along a continuum. China, Smil's and my main area of expertise, is in the stretch. Smil, arguing against Lester Brown, sees much hope for China. However, China's government is currently toward the weak and tyrannical end, making Lester Brown's gloomy predictions look more reasonable. China has a long history of saving itself at the last minute, and Smil may be right in the end. But China also has a long, long history of famine caused by inept governance. Anyway, the point is made, and I wish Smil had made it: Good government, not technology and not food waste, is the key. This being said, Smil's book is about the best out there at the present, and brings together a huge array of important facts, many of them otherwise almost impossible to find in the specialized literature. Anyone interested in world futures had better read it.

7 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Reality check, July 17, 2003

By 

Theodore (WATERBURY, VT, United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Feeding the World: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century (Paperback)

The debate over feeding a growing world population seems like an ink blot test - you "see" your paradigm (prejudices, world view) and feel strongly, usually without a lot of data.

This seems true of environmentalists as well as free market enthusiasts.

Vaclav Smil recaps the debate, including Paul Ehrlich's famous vasectomy and - so far always wildly inaccurate - prophesies of massive starvation, and the equally enthusiastic faith of free marketers that technology and free markets will _always_ and _forever_ keep right on booming.

Then he adds a reality check, going over the data and the science in loving detail.

Smil has spent many years in the field - and in paddies ;-) - all over the world, so his summary for general readers recaps his own cutting-edge scholarly books as well as scholarship generally. Freeman Dyson was deeply impressed by Smil's general work on bioenergetics, the physics of ecology - Smil is the rare bird who can do first-rate research _and_ explain it without talking-down, grinding an ax or equations (he does have a flow diagram for biospheric nitrogen that is truly elegant, as well as charts and graphs that _work_ without bogging you down).

While he concludes it is just possible to feed the projected world population over the next century, the fascination is in the details he presents elegantly.

For instance - the loving movement for more work horses on farms. I love morgans, but some even love mules ;-)

All agricultural uses consume about 1% of North American liquid fuels, but feeding the horses needed to replace internal combustion would require 250% of current land devoted to agriculture. Smil is too delicate to ask what we'd do with all that horse manure - in the 1850s, New York City had a small industry devoted to sweeping it up and shipping it to Connecticut's "gold coast" to grow onions.

Nitrogen fertilizers are perhaps the critical input, and perhaps one third of us today could not be fed without artificial nitrates (Smil has a book _Transforming the World_ just on this topic).

He is equally powerful, point by point, on just how China went from starving en masse with Mao to current surpluses, what we know and do not know about soil erosion, and each of the limiting factors in crop varieties (cultivars, if you like good words). He does not seem to over-emphasize, but if genetic re-engineering of crops ever gets beyond resistance to pests, the underlying efficiencies of photosynthesis plus organic fixation of nitrogen _conceivably_ might allow some wildly more efficient "Frankenfoods", a sort of "monster mash" using C4 photosynthesis as the basis.

If Smil takes sides in the clash of worldviews, he successfully presents it in terms of in-put efficiencies. E.g., will we really starve because we will run out of farmland, because artificial fertilizers will run short or kill-off the micro-life that make soils live.

I found one sentence bemoaning the "collapse" of petroleum prices, which cut short "drilling for oil" by improving energy efficiency. This is where engineering efficiency loses touch with most of us. Gasoline cheaper than bottled water is good for most of us, bad for OPEC, and state interventions to artificially impose the cost signals from $40/barrel petroleum would be hugely costly even before you count pure waste.

Consider Al Gore's "carbon tax" which immediately gave coal an exemption - because coal is so clean, or maybe to pay-off the UMW and Senator Byrd. Britain passed a carbon tax, but somehow imposed a double helping on state-owned _nuclear_ power plants that generate zero "green house" gases, again because coal production has political clout that completely offsets any environmental arguments.

But Smil's strength is _precisely_ his ability to focus on the data, on the science. Economics and politics, let alone worldviews that mimic theology, show up only as consequences of the biophysics.