3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Interesting read, December 28, 2009
This review is from: A Feminist Introduction to Paul (Paperback)
I had to read this for seminary, and it is a much better academic take on Paul than the title might suggest. I was initially skeptical, thinking this work was going to be another feminist rant against Paul the apostle. What I found unique about it was that the work was largely in favor and sympathetic of Paul and his Theology, while still coming from a feminist lens.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4.0 out of 5 stars
Uncovering Paul in a feminist perspective, January 22, 2012
This review is from: A Feminist Introduction to Paul (Paperback)
Paul's letters and the letters in the Pauline tradition are hard for feminists to read. How are modern women supposed to take injunctions for women to not speak in church, to not teach or have authority over men, and to be subject to their husbands, while at the same time, and sometimes in the same letters, figure out what Paul means when he discusses how women should pray and prophesy, acknowledges without comment female workers in Christ (including a deacon and at least one apostle), and states in the Galations baptismal formula that we are neither male and female, but all are one in Christ Jesus?
Often, the solutions either are to privilege the verses that demean women, and "put them in their place," or to read them so much in their context that we fail to see any use for them in today's society. In truth, if all scripture is "inspired," then we have to wrestle with these texts, reading them both in context and in what they might mean today. Sandra Polaski manages to balance that line. For example, while she suggests Paul was a creature of his day, she points out that Paul the man was more complicated than many scholars are willing to recognize--he was both Jewish and at home with Greek rhetoric. Further, the roles of women in Jewish and Roman societies were more complicated than often given credit, that women did indeed sometimes have at least limited leadership roles.
Overall, Polawski makes two points that I was able to take away from this work, and for which I can recommend the book. First, througout Paul's rhetoric is the idea of "new creation." Whatever that looks like, we are all part of it, and as we are one in Christ, we are one body, with many diverse parts. And "birthing" this new creation requires an understanding of the feminine as well as the masculine of God, and of us. Second, we can extrapolate that, if Paul's main concernw was equality between Jew and Greet, that both can be equally saved in God's new kin-dom, we too can work to bring about equality in our spheres of concern and calling: racial equality, gender equality, sexual orientation equality, etc.
Polawski comes out and says not everyone will agree with her conclusions, and that's okay. I like that she says her way of reading Paul is not the only way. But, particularly for those who struggle with where Paul stands on female equality, this is a good place to start to draw one's own conclusions.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No