Customer Reviews


21 Reviews
5 star:
 (11)
4 star:
 (5)
3 star:
 (3)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


69 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Easiest book for everyone
I've been teaching in the outdoors using field guides with novices for 18 years, so I offer this advice to assist beginners in choosing a wildflower guide. I have used both this book and the Newcomb book and greatly prefer this one, although Newcomb's is very good. Newcomb's uses a series of keys, which I guess some people find more "sophisticated." Although...
Published on October 25, 2002

versus
61 of 61 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Helpful tool in conjunction with other sources.
Though I personally prefer Newcomb's Wildflower Guide over this one, I have found that when in doubt after reading Newcomb's description of a plant, this book helps me decide whether or not it is correct. It's smart to always use more than one guide for identifying plants because different authors notice different qualities that they think are important. I'm not too...
Published on June 21, 1999


‹ Previous | 1 2 3 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

61 of 61 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Helpful tool in conjunction with other sources., June 21, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
Though I personally prefer Newcomb's Wildflower Guide over this one, I have found that when in doubt after reading Newcomb's description of a plant, this book helps me decide whether or not it is correct. It's smart to always use more than one guide for identifying plants because different authors notice different qualities that they think are important. I'm not too keen on identifying any plant by the color of the flower, because it limits the amount of time you have to identify a plant. Newcomb's system is much, much better for finding plants that are not in bloom, though part of the key relies on flower parts. Until someone comes up with an easy key for identifying plants based on vegetation only, I suggest buying both this book and Newcomb's book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


69 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Easiest book for everyone, October 25, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
I've been teaching in the outdoors using field guides with novices for 18 years, so I offer this advice to assist beginners in choosing a wildflower guide. I have used both this book and the Newcomb book and greatly prefer this one, although Newcomb's is very good. Newcomb's uses a series of keys, which I guess some people find more "sophisticated." Although the key in Newcombs isn't hard to use, I find that the Peterson guide is faster and easier to use in the field. I have also observed that beginners are less likely to make mistakes using the Peterson wildflower guide. The big plus of the Peterson book is the identification system. The flowers are first arranged by color and the book is color coded. Although wild plants may not always be showing their flower colors, 9 times out of ten when the amateur is identifying a flowering plant, it will be in bloom. You can use the Peterson guide to learn the key characterisitics of a blooming plant so that later on when it is not blooming you will still be able to find it in the book and recoginze it.

In the next stage of the Peterson wildflower guide's organization, the plants are arranged by similar visual characteristics. There is a simple outline and description of this system at the beginning of the book. The book utilizes helpful icons, which are featured at the tops of all the descriptive pages for quick thumb-through reference. I have found this icon system very helpful in teaching plant identification because it provides a systematic approach that the beginner can pick up quickly and easily. The Peterson system greatly facilitates intial accuracy of identification at the level of plant family. Once you learn the system of what to look for when observing a plant, the icons allow speed and efficiency when using the book in the field.

At the final stage of identification, the species level, the Peterson guide has excellent written descriptions and the important subtle differences between species are well highlighted, with both text and arrows on the drawings. As other reviewers have stated, the Peterson book has more illustrations than Newcomb, and the highlighted habitat/range descriptions also help in quickly placing a plant. The black and white illustrations are not bothersome since you already know the flower color, and line drawings show key characteristics clearly. The use of illustrations instead of photos is always preferred in a field guide, even though photos seem like a good idea at first glance. A good illustrator shows the plant in the best light and makes sure the key features are visible and prominent.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


29 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Pretty good field guide, October 4, 1998
By A Customer
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
This is a very good field guide to wildflowers, but I do have a few gripes about the book. First of all, most of the pictures are black and white line drawings with some color plates. Many students that I have that use the book for identifying flowers have difficulties with many of the drawings. The descriptions of the flowers are a little sketchy. Also, several species that are in my area are not in the book (the author does point out in the beginning of the book that the book may not be accurate at the perimeter of the region due to species from surrounding areas infiltrating these areas. Kentucky is one of those states on the border. I would like to see a book for the Southern US to see if these species are listed there.) The book does have several strengths though. First of all, it lists more species than other books I have used and does a great job of pointing out subtle differences between related species. The book is also arranged by color and grouped by type and arrangement of flower. The inner jacket is basically a picture dictionary of botany terminology. I recommend this book for anyone interested in wildflowers and want to be able to identify them.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


28 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars A Very Useful Guide, December 3, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
I own several wildflower identification books, and this one is among my favorites. I often use it in conjunction with other books, but it also does well on its own. I like the fact that the subjects are listed by color - this makes it much easier for me to differentiate species when out in the woods. I have given this book as a gift to flower-loving friends.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


21 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Best For Laymen, July 27, 2001
By 
Vicki (Maine, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
I have used this book for 20 years to identify wildflowers successfully; the drawings and paintings capture the essence of the flower in a way no photo does; the book includes many less commonly found plants so you are more likely to find what you're looking for; and it is organized by flower color which is most likely to be what drew your attention in the first place. Excellent reference, easily used.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars indispensable!, January 26, 2007
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
I have used Petersons books for decades, and continue to update to new
issues while cherishing my issue from the 1970's. Anyone seeking to
comprehensively identify wildflowers from color plate photographs alone
is not only missing the point of field work, but may miss the flower as
well- colors look different in different light and in different photo- op's.
There are many other features to consider in correct plant ID.
The relevant ID features are often more obscure, yet are dutifully pointed
out in the Peterson guides - characteristics such as "mottled stems",
"fringed bracts", various leaf attachment features, size and range of
plant, and so on. As the director of a high quality school dealing in
herbal studies and nature research, as well as a college level teacher,
this and a small cadre of supplemental ID resources, including Steve
Brill's book, are going to remain on my list of required books for
all students , one they will use , along with their friends and family,
again and again.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars A great help to flower identification, January 18, 2007
By 
C. Travis (Tennessee, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
I have used this book for many years and it is the easiest most comprehensive book on the subject. It is never esay to identify a flower you do not know, but with a little practice, this book is a big help.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars the first one I grab in the field, November 17, 2009
By 
Joyce (South Carolina, USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
Of all my guides, I've consistently used this one for 30 years. It may not get you to the exact species, but it will get you to genus. (I then use a key in other books to get to species). Being color coded it is easy to use. The drawings and field marks are good. It also helps you learn the families. I give this book to all of my friends who ask for a "good wildflower book" to take in the woods.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Comrehensive but difficult to use..., August 25, 2008
By 
JZ (Blanchester, OH USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
I found this book to be more comprehensive than the comparable Wildflower Guide from the Audubon Society. This book shows more complete drawings of the plant (not just the flowering portion). However, this book does not contain photographs and instead contains artistic representations (black and white line drawings with occassional colored drawings). Additionally, some plants are not catagorized under what I would say is the correct color section... i.e. Western Ironweed has *PURPLE* flowers, but is found in the *PINK* section. I find this book difficult to use for identifying an unknown species. It is most useful to me in identifying the variety when you have some idea of the species. When comparing this book against the one from the Audubon Society, I prefer this one simply because this book shows more of a complete image of the entire plant. This book has limited usefullness for me, but I'm giving it an average rating because I haven't found anything better yet.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Great help for class wildflower project, October 11, 2007
This review is from: A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides) (Paperback)
This book really helped my son with his wildflower project for science class.
Many of the other books we checked out of the library were too complicated for him (and I) to use and were not detailed enough.
It is organized by flower color which made it easier to get a correct identification. The only down side is that all of the flowers are not pictured in color...some of them are drawn in black and white within a color family.
However, I would recommend this book as it was easy for my 8th grade son to use on his own for the project.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 3 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

A Field Guide to Wildflowers : Northeastern and North-Central North America (Peterson Field Guides)
$20.00 $13.51
In Stock
Add to cart Add to wishlist