11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Final Grade: C+, June 1, 2008
This review is from: Fighting the Slave Trade: West African Strategies (Western African Studies) (Paperback)
This book is in fact not written by Diouf but is a collection of over a dozen different essays that discuss how slavery affected West Africa. The book automatically wins points for simply addressing this topic, especially because most books about African enslavement are about its existence in the Western Hemisphere.
This book helps bring to light the fact that West Africans did not go quietly into slavery and revolt only upon reaching the Americas. This book focuses on ways in which some ethnic groups resisted enslavement and capture by other ethnic groups in West Africa.
That being said I was dissapointed that the book does not discuss West African resistance to Europeans. For example, the famed Senegalese King of Almammy in 1787 not only banned slavery but banned any slave being carried through his kingdom. As a result the French( with the recruitment of Arabophone Moors) destroyed his kingdom; nevertheless he is a magnificent example of West African enlightenment.
Furthermore, the book does explain the political fragmentation of the coast as a major factor for the development of the Atlantic Slave Trade, but it does not discuss the Guns for Slaves policy that Europeans enacted to ensure a supply of captives. The policy states that the only way the West African traders would get guns (which was the primary trading item for slaves and not "trinkets" as so many people think)was by giving captives, not even gold would suffice. This put the West African merchants and rulers in a predicament: if they chose not to go along with this policy yet their neighbors do, where do you think the gun holding neighbors would get their captives from? This along the fact that West Africans did not have factories to produce the guns at the rate of Europeans made it nearly impossible for the slave trade to not flourish. The fact that this book does not mention the dynamics of this is quite dissapointing.
It is surely the case that the reason the book does not address these issues is because, despite as progressive as Western society is claiming to be, responsibility for the Atlantic Slave Trade must remain primarily in the hands of Africans. Any attempt to pay homage to those Africans who opposed it or the instigation of the trade by Europeans is not scholarly work, but African "romanticism".
Black scholars dread this label, romantic, because it discredits their professionalism and academic integrity. Thus they validate their credibility as a scholar by saying "I am not afraid to take full responsibility for the slave trade." Many scholars, such as Gates and Appiah, fall victim to this.
The problem with this is that we are still not having a balance discussion, because the African villian and the conflict between Africans is the reality, and any African who has integrity and challenges Europeans cannot be a true hero, but a romantic character made to give African people dignity. I'm not saying the more fantastical African of some less credible scholars should be the picture we take, but that a balance is in order. We will never have all or even most of the stories of those valiant Africans, both commoners and royalty, who opposed the Atlantic slave trade, but we do have some, and no matter how "romantic" we are accused of being for acknowledging them, they remain some of our race's most heroic figures.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No