Film and the Anarchist Imagination [Hardcover]

Porton (Author), Richard Porton (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: August 1999

Broad in historical scope, Porton provides an excellent guide to the complex traditions of anarchist thought in film.

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

Porton (cinema studies, Coll. of Staten Island) presents a study of how anarchy, as a political theory or belief, has been presented on the screen in feature films and documentaries. Readers with some prior knowledge of this political philosophy and the names associated with it will get the most out of the work. The majority of the films under consideration are American or European and were not made by anarchists. Porton examines film portrayals of anarchist heroes and martyrs such as Joe Hill, Sacco and Vanzetti, and Buenaventura Durutti and illustrates other anarchist topics by examining specific filmsAZero for Conduct, If, and Jonas Who Will Be 25 in the Year 2000 are used in the consideration of anarchist pedagogy. He also covers anarcho-feminism, the revolt against work, anarcho-syndicalism, anti-statist insurrections, and bohemia. Few of the films discussed earn Porton's whole-hearted approval. For large academic collections only.AMarianne Cawley, Charleston Cty. Lib., SC
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Review

Richard Porton's erudite and eloquent history of anarchist cinema breaks new ground in both film and cultural studies; there is nothing comparable to it in English. -- David E. James

This is a major addition to the scholarship around radical film history, and if you have anything more than a passing interest in Film or Anarchism I strongly suggest you pick it up. -- Sean Sullivan, MaximumRocknRoll, December 1999

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Hardcover: 320 pages
• Publisher: Verso (August 1999)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1859847021
• ISBN-13: 978-1859847022
• Product Dimensions: 8 x 8 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,809,614 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars An excellent overview of anarchism in the cinema, September 6, 1999

By 

Richard A. Schindler "Rara Avis" (USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Film and the Anarchist Imagination (Paperback)

Richard Porton has succeeded in doing what few other authors have done in the past. He has written an accessible, clearminded assessment of anarchist philosophy and its effect on film, both in the medium's historical and contemporary manifestations. The range of his discussion includes the depiction of anarchists in film, the use of cinematic techniques to exemplify anarchist ideas, the history of anarchist movements and their effect on cinema, and the problems attending any consideration of anarchism within the medium of film. Without any blatant prosyletizing, Porton makes a case for the validity of anarchist philosophies and knowledgably leads the reader through all the ideas, arguments, prejudices, and mistaken assumptions that have surrounded anarchism since its inception in the 19th century. He accurately portrays the diversity of anarchist thought from libertarianism to anarcho-communism to punk mayhem, while securely linking that diversity to a wealth of 20th-century films. His book is a must-read for everyone who has any interest in anarchist ideologies, film history and criticism, and cultural studies.

5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars An important contribution to film history, June 2, 2000

By A Customer

This review is from: Film and the Anarchist Imagination (Paperback)

This book provides a very good overview of its' subject, covering both anarchist and anarchist-associated filmmakers (like Bunuel and Vigo) as well as films that deal with anarchism, like Wertmuller's Love and Anarchy. The book is scholarly, so people looking for an easy read should look elsewhere. But I believe that it will come to be seen as the definitive work on this topic for a long time to come.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Imaginary Anarchists, November 28, 2008

By 

S. Shukaitis "linguistic functionary" (London) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Film and the Anarchist Imagination (Paperback)

This book is at that same time quite good, and also disappointing. Good in the sense that it covers a lot of material, particularly in regards to older films, which I haven't come across. So now I have a quite substantial list of interesting films to track down and watch (for instance the first one I looked for is Rene Clair's A Nous la Liberte, which I had not heard of before, but is a brilliant comedy-operetta about work refusal, factories, etc). Porton makes a number of interesting points about particular films, aesthetics, politics and their conjunction. The main letdown is the book is not really about the anarchist imagination per se, as much as the role that anarchists have played in the popular imagination as embodied in the form of film. Not surprisingly in societies hostile to anarchist thought this often comes across as clichéd, reductive, and silly portrayals of anarchism and anarchists. Bearded bombe throwers and the like (although I suppose now that is being replaced by the image of the black pajama block). This is not so surprising, although I suppose in am academic context since I think that Porton is the first to write about such that makes it a good contribution to knowledge. What would strike me as more interesting would be to explore the relation between anarchist approaches to representation, aesthetics and knowledge as they operate within film, and whether the form is conducive to the fostering of anarchistic imaginaries and relations. In other words to take anarchism as an approach rather than an object of study, which is what I thought the book would be trying to do given the title. Porton does this somewhat and draws out some interesting tensions and questions at places, for instance in discussion of pro-work / anti-work tensions within different strains of anarchist thought (although I'd wish he would have done this more often). So overall it's quite a good book, although I kept wishing that those moments would occur more frequently, that it would be a work anarchist imagination rather than on the imagination constructed of anarchism.