Customer Reviews

Final Judgement:The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy

5 star:		(4)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

FINAL JUDGEMENT by MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER [WIDELY ENLARGED LAST EDITION, WITH MANY ILLUSTRATIONS AND AN INDEX]
First ,one has to admire his writing talent and his encyclopaedic mind while dealing with the highly controversial data tied to Kennedy's assassination.
This is a very interesting book:
o because it manages to blow away disinformation and cennsoship of the controlled media; it brings to light many murky aspects of the complicated and dirty intrigues and alliances of Kennedy's enemies;
o it shows how badly the Kennedy brothers managed to misread and miscalculate the occult moves of their enemies and brought upon themselves their own physical destruction.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: THIS IS A MAN OF COURAGE.
ABOUT THE BOOK: PROBABLY THE MOST INTERESTING BOOK WRITTEN SOFAR ON THIS SUBJECT. THIS BOOK IS RECOMMENDED.

Napoleon is reputed to have stated: History is an agreed upon set of lies by the victors; while Henry Ford stated: History is bunk! Both of these able men were probably right. After all, today we don't know much about the Carthaginians or Gauls except through a Roman filter, and the Romans were not noted for being objective about their enemies.
Today, we live in a period where objective discussion about current events and values has become rare. The truth does not necessarily win out. For example, anyone who discusses the 'Holocaust' in an unapproved way in public in most western countries can very easily end up in prison or with their lives ruined. The truth doesn't need laws to protect it. It stands on its own. Yet nowadays those who rule our societies decide what 'truths' will be supported while inconvenient 'truths' are ignored or actively suppressed. Those who believe that conspiracies have existed and continue to occur are labelled as 'nuts' and 'delusional' if those beliefs are not approved by the system and its controlled media. Indeed, believing that the media is 'controlled' is viewed as aberational thinking which probably should be 'treated'. The Soviets were skilled at this type of treatment.
Collins Piper definitely has a point. His reasoning is supported by a wealth of circumstantial evidence. Because it is circumstantial doesn't mean that it is invalid. Many informed witnesses did indeed meet untimely ends while hard evidence was cleaned up long ago. Anyone who believes that Oswald acted alone really is delusional. The fact that the powers that be were able to suppress any proper investigation of Kennedy's murder and allay the suspicions of the American public for so long shows their power. The same system has successfully covered over the 9/11 conspiracy, a much greater crime with much more terrible consequences for America and the world. Who today gives much thought to Rooseveldt's Pearl Harbour conspiracy? The idea that Israel was behind Kennedy's death is hardly far fetched. This ruthless state has shown again and again that it is capable of just about any outrage. The only difference today is that, through the internet, people are much more aware and many of us are far less trusting of the ruling class than in the past. As one of the reviewers below states the book is a bit disjointed in places, however, that hardly rates it a single star. The central thesis is solid and so makes it a worthwhile piece of investigative journalism.

Rather than a focus on bullet angles and sound analysis, this book goes after the question of WHY JFK was hit and WHO stood to benefit.

This book is very comprehensive in its list of characters. All are described very well. It is their connecting links that will astound the reader.

Highly recommended.

Until a recent TV broadcast showing two of Kennedy's Secret Service men waved off (out of the way) before the shots were fired, the only suspects were Russia(Cuban Missile crisis), Cuba(attempted Castro overthrow), and the Mafia. Since it looked like someone got to the Secret Service(unlikely with the above), I was back to wondering. Than I came across an old article(12/19/08) in Haaretz, an Israeli daily, about Kennedy's attempt to stop Israel's nuclear program and the resulting resignation of their longtime Prime Minister. Could they have had the ability to "get to" the secret service? Read the book and see If it is a possibility.

Most people who have seen the Zapruder film have logically concluded that the shot that killed JFK obviously came from the right front (grassy knoll). And anyone who readily wants to view video evidence of a Secret Service "stand down" around JFK's limousine (Nov 22) need only go to YOU TUBE (query: JFK assassination: Secret Service Standdown). These two video facts, alone, are sufficient evidence that our government and the MAJOR NEWS MEDIA are still lying to us!

Occasionally, skeptics of "conspiracy theories" will claim that many of the principal suspects in the JFK assassination -- who had motive & opportunity (e.g., Rosselli, Giacanna, Marcello ( Mafia) . . . JE Hoover (FBI) ,... Allen Dulles (CIA) ... Howard Hughes (Military-Industrial Complex) . . . HL Hunt (Big Oil) . . . Jimmy Hoffa (Teamsters) . . . LBJ & Nixon (politicos), etc.. -- ARE ALL DEAD NOW!!!

Which means?? IF these so-called "nefarious principles" had controlled the major media through bribes, blackmail, and death threats, then all these conspiracies should have been revealed, by now, considering the "bad guys" are not around to suppress evidence, nor to harass any investigative reporters!!

The implication being what ? IF there is NO ONE left to suppress evidence, then where's the evidence of conspiracy? No evidence . . . no conspiracy!!

It all sounds plausible . . . UNTIL ONE READS MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER'S BOOK -- FINAL JUDGEMENT!

Historians agree that IF Oswald had gone to trial, a lot of suppressed facts would have come to light decades ago!!! But Oswald didn't stand trial . . . thanks to JACK RUBY (aka Jacob Rubenstein)!

And who was JACK RUBY??? According to the main stream media, Ruby was just another "lone-nut-kook," who killed Oswald, on the "spur-of-the-moment," to become a self-proclaimed "hero!"

Many assassination researchers are willing to concede, however, that Ruby was involved with organized crime as a bit player (fringe operator) in the Italian-Sicilian mafia and involved in the selling of guns to anti-Castro Cubans (Bay Of Pigs). But few are willing to touch, yet explore, the probability that Ruby was a 'made man' in the 'JEWISH MAFIA!'

There is evidence that the Jewish Mafia (e.g., Meyer Lanskey, Moe Dalitz, Mickey Cohen, et al) were all involved in gun-running weapons to Zionist (Israeli) terrorist organizations (e.g., Stern Gang, Irgun, Haganah) during the 1940s. These Zionist terrorist groups are the reason Jews were able to successfully establish a homeland in Palestine (Israel).

Have any Zionist terrorists ever tried to assassinate a U.S. President?? The average American will say "NO!" And that's because our history books, from grammer school thru college, do not reveal one word about the assassination attempt by the Zionist terrorist group -- Stern Gang -- against President Harry S Truman, in 1947. The Stern Gang sent Truman a gelignite letter bomb which was intercepted by the Secret Service and defused! (see Margaret Truman's biography of her father, Harry S. Truman, page 489)

If the major media suppressed the story of the attempted assassination of President Truman by Zionist terrorists in 1947, what is the probability that the major media suppressed ZIonist terrorist's & the Jewish mafia's involvement in JFK's assassination?

Was Israel seeking to expand its borders by stealing Palestinian land (West Bank, Golan Heights, & Gaza) through feigned "defensive" warfare?? Could the U.S.S. Liberty ship have exposed that?? Was the Jewish mafia stealing U.S. surplus weapons off U.S. docks and military bases? Were Zionists ever involved in stealing U.S. nuclear secrets and acquiring nuclear weapons against the wishes of the Kennedy Administration!! Were the Kennedys secretly at war with the Zionists over nuclear proliferation??

PLEASE READ MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER'S BOOK -- FINAL JUDGEMENT! Mr Piper bravely DARES to explore and explain this "verboten" subject. However, any honest reader of his book knows damn well that Mr Piper is NOT a ranting anti-semite and "Holocaust denier" that the JDL, ADL, and other Zionist propaganda organizations try to LABEL (stigmatize) him as being!

WAYNE

PS: There are those who ask: How do you keep a conspiracy secret when thousand of individuals are involved? My answer: ask the thousands of participants in the 'Manhattan Project' (New Mexico, 1945).

There are those who ask: Do 'THE JEWS' dominate and control the media? My answer: NO! However, YOU DO NOT NEED TO BE JEWISH TO BE A ZIONIST! SO, THE QUESTION SHOULD BE: DO ZIONISTS DOMINATE AND CONTROL THE MAJOR MEDIA?? YES . . .100% !!!!

How can that be proven?? List the names of the ANTI-ZIONISTS who have their own high profile, major network, prime time, TV shows compared to FOX News, Bill O'Reilly, Russ Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Today Show, The View, etc! Remember -- we're supposed to be making the world "SAFE FOR DEMOCRACY and FREE SPEECH . . . not safe for Zionist aggression!!!!

As a fan of almost any book on the JFK murder, this is one I could not get through.
It is not that my mind is not open to the possibility of Mossad involvement with the hit in Dallas, but this thesis involves too much a leap of faith. Three Jews having lunch does not prove a "jewish conspiracy" and while Meyer Lansky was undoubtedly a pivotal figure in Mob history, it does not follow that he was the "Meyer Lansky Crime Syndicate" without proof.
I read, or more correctly, attempted to read, the 2nd printing of the sixth edition. As such, it was layered with several forwards, introductions, and notes; all without pagination, all repetitious in their major points without proof.
There is grist for the mill in this book, Joe Kennedy's pro-German position which got him relieved as British ambassador, his boot legging activities, dealing with support of Giancana in Chicago for the nomination and election of JFK in 1960, etc.
There is smoke, but no fire can be proven. Yes, LBJ was very pro-Israel in his legislative career, and would have been an improvement for Israel over JFK and his nuclear non-proliferation policy, but how to prove it all?
Michael Collin Piper is an intelligent man, but as it stands in its Sixth Edition, this book is hopelessly repetitive without proof, and hampered by too many introductions, notes and asides.
It needs a serious re-write to bring it all together and for me to get through it. Very few books, and none on JFK, have I ever failed to read to completion, but this was one of them.
I wouldn't dismiss this as an anti-semetic rant, but not a book for the serious reader either. Piper is the only author other than Jim Marrs who makes the point professional assassins were in Dallas that day, so he is on to something.
If there is a seventh edition, there needs to be a re-write which zeros in on his thesis. It is not beyond consideration by history. But as it stands now, Final Judgement is but a partial indictment.