Most Helpful Customer Reviews
165 of 174 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very well written and thoroughly researched, May 23, 2009
yet, I don't know that this book really adds anything particuularly new to the debate of the existence of God vs. Science.
This book will give you lots to think about- whether you are religious, spiritual, agnostic or atheist. The author does conclude that "brokenness is the best predictor of spiritual experience", meaning that a large portion of those who have a spiritually enlightening experience, or are 'touched by God', arrive there via a process. One is broken down and then at some low point is 'touched' and the author states that people of all belief systems perceive 'otherness' in a similar way(having to do with darkness, distance and then a light and ensuing peace). She uses former addicts and alcoholics or those ill with serious and sometimes fatal diseases as examples.
What I liked about this book, aside from the fact it is very welll written and organized(I imagine quite tricky given the breadth of the subject matter and the anecdotal nature of many of the references), is that the author was very open minded in looking at the question. She considers the scientific evidence both for and against the existence of some greater force at work in the universe, as well as anecdotal evidence, opinions of doctors, scientists, philosophers- even such famous atheists as Dawkins, and religious clergy of all sorts. She crosses all lines of faith and religion.
The author hails from a Christian Science background but as an individual who fell away from her faith and then regained a new faith through her individual spiritual experience. The facts she presents are interwoven with her own personal journey.
An interesting point are the numerous stories she recounts of individuals seemingly changed overnight by their encounter with God, however they perceive God to be: alcoholics and addicts alleviated of their addictions, those who have staved off degenerative illness, or those lifted from a chaotic and depressing life, changed.
Is it God? Or merely the power of the mind or a certain personal decisiveness? The placebo effect of true belief in something greater than oneself? The author admits freely that this cannot be proved scientifically.
She says it all: "I have concluded that science cannot prove God- but science is entirely consistent with God." She presents God as biologist, chemist, physicist and touches on the brain as the seat of consciousness, out of body experiences, near-death experiences and ultimately that spirituality is a choice to seek, to ask the question.
If you are looking for a definitive proof of the existence of God, this isn't it- and in fact, the author states that won't be coming because if there is a God, he/she/it operates outside of nature, outside of science, beyond our understanding. If you are looking for proof of the benefit a spiritual life or belief in God can provide, there is a great deal of good material here.
My opinion? It will always come down to one thing: those with faith and those without. What and where we find the beliefs we can embrace and hold onto may differ for every person, but there is certainly something in us that begs us to seek our truth.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
67 of 70 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
An Interesting but Fairly One-Sided Examination of Faith and Science, June 21, 2009
Barbara Bradley Hagerty was raised as a Christian Scientist, a view she disavowed as a twenty-something. Now a religion correspondent for NPR, this book chronicles her year long quest to answer a question: is there any real scientific evidence for God?
In Fingerprints of God, we witness Hagerty's numerous interviews with those who claim to have had mystical, out-of-body, and near death experiences. We also interview the many scientists who have studied "neurotheology" - the biological and neurological underpinnings of religion and religious experience. During all of this, Hagerty lets us hear her own thoughts as she encounters these religious believers and scientists. Hagerty writes very conversationally and honestly about her beliefs, doubts, and misgivings.
But in all honestly, the thing I liked least about the book was that Hagerty was simply not very balanced. She struck me as someone who very much wanted to find evidence for God in science and set out to find it regardless of what the evidence actually is. (To her credit, she admits that she is biased in favor of belief in a deity, but it does take the investigativeness out of the investigation.) At least twenty times in the book, she writes paragraph upon paragraph about a scientist who sees evidence of god in biology/neurology, only to dismiss in a paragraph the skeptical scientist by saying something like: "...but there HAS to be more to it than just biology/neurology."
The book was an interesting read, and Hagerty is a very good writer, capable of expressing very deep thoughts in simple terms. My only objection about her writing is that it is a tad formulaic in organizaiton; each chapter is organized very much the same as the others. (Starts with an non-scientist anecdote, goes to another, forays into a discusison of the science behend the anecdotes, discusses the skeptics viewpoint, dismisses it, concludes.) Still, as formuulaic as her chapters could sometimes be, I kept reading; Hagerty had a way of making it all quite interesting.
Despite its flaws, this is a good book about an interesting and timely subject.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
44 of 54 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
An Important New Journalistic Inquiry into the classic 'Varieties of Religious Experience', May 26, 2009
If you could ask 1 question of National Public Radio's religion correspondent Barbara Bradley Hagerty, what would it be?
Well, recently Barbara switched sides in the studio and let NPR's Diane Rehm interview her about her unusual new book, "Fingerprints of God: The Search for the Science of Spirituality." When Diane opened up the telephone lines to listeners coast to coast, the essence of what they asked Barbara was: So, do you think prayer works? (People want to know if there's any serious scientific basis for taking spiritual experiences seriously--after all, half of all Americans report having had a transformative spiritual experience at some point in life.)
Many of us want to know how Barbara answers such a question. After all, this is a hard-headed, nationally respected NPR journalist--a balanced, skeptical reporter who covers religion in the classic approach of the now-endangered profession called religion news writing. If Barbara Bradley Hagerty thinks prayer works--that's inspirational news!
On the air, she answered the question mainly in the affirmative.
Some callers described dramatic scenarios in which they believe God answered prayers and they challenged Barbara to agree or disagree with them.
Wisely, Barbara told the radio audience: "When it comes to spirituality, all you can say is: It's possible." If I had to sum up her new 300-page book in one sentence--well, you just read it from Barbara's own broadcast.
The cover and the title may make her new book seem like yet another volume in the roaring, roundabout debate between atheists, scientists and defenders of faith. So, let me be clear: It's not.
In fact, the roots of this book go back more than a century to William James, the pioneering scientist, psychologist and all-around philosopher who launched a historic inquiry into the scientific basis of religion from his offices at Harvard. His classic " The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature" still makes great reading.
What I like best about this new response to the classic question James posed is that Hagerty's journalistic training shapes her book as a compelling narrative. She takes us along with her on her various stops along her inquiry, like a radio documentary in print form.
It's great for individual readers to enjoy, but I suspect you'll want to talk about this one with a friend. I know small groups would enjoy discussing the wide range of topics between these covers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|