Amazon.com Review
Many of us have heard stories about ghoulish medical students and the pranks they play using arms, heads, or other parts "borrowed" from the cadavers in their anatomy labs. Like most urban legends, these stories are both compelling and untrue, telling us more about how we imagine the world to be than how it really is.
First Cut contains the observations of a humanities professor allowed to watch medical students struggle with the challenges presented by their first anatomy class. Carter tracks, and mirrors, the students' progress from initial nervous joking and unwillingness to touch the bodies to familiarity and respect for their "silent instructors," culminating in an end-of-term Service of Reflection and Gratitude.
As he sees changes "in personal feelings about death, touching, and the wonderfully complex activities of the human body" in the young men and women, he also puts to rest the memory of his father, who had donated his body for medical study. Pacing the story are three inspired essays on the nature of medical education and thirty beautiful and absorbing Renaissance anatomical illustrations. First Cut, far from being a sensationalistic account of young doctors run amok, is perfect for anyone who is interested in understanding medicine and its practitioners. --Rob Lightner
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Library Journal
Humanities professor Carter spent a semester as a Dana Foundation Fellow observing the human anatomy class for first-year medical students at Emory University, and this book is the result?a rare opportunity for outsiders. As a book, however, it's something of a missed opportunity. While readers are taken carefully through the series of cadaver dissections by which medical students begin to learn anatomy and integrate their own humanity with their chosen profession, this book is too much step by step, with too little integration. Seeming to be largely nonintrospective, the students rarely come alive themselves, because the focus of their struggle is narrowly confined to performing well on quizzes and exams. The author's search for familial identity and history (his father willed his own body to anatomical study) is human but not compellingly narrated. Note to general and K-12 collections: although maturely handled, parts of the narrative are almost gory, and the "jokes" are potentially upsetting. More suitable for academic collections.?Mark L. Shelton, Univ. of Massachusetts Medical Ctr., Worcester
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.