| ||||||||||||||||||||
Christine C. Menefee, Fairfax County Public Library, VA
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
It's time to go to Mars!,
By Kevin E. Atkins (Denver, CO USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: First Landing (Hardcover)
Every once in a while, I pick up a book thatÕs tough to put down. I read this one in several sittings and as I read, I kept thinking of what a great film it would make. I make this statement because the novel is very visual, has a great cast of characters, and a story line with a interesting perspective on the first manned Mars mission. I like my Science Fiction with a heavy emphasis on science and technology, and this book delivered. I found myself deeply involved with the characters, and their situations as well. The last few chapters, especially the epilog, brought a tear or two to my eyes. I highly recommend this novel.
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Almost every page is cringe-worthy,
By
This review is from: First Landing (Hardcover)
I have read most of the modern Mars novels, including Ben Bova's MARS, Jack Williamson's BEACHHEAD, Stephen Baxter's VOYAGE, and Kim Stanley Robinson's RED MARS. Until now, I have always felt Williamson's book was the worst -- the equivalent of CBS' soap opera 'Dallas' set in space. But Robert Zubrin's FIRST LANDING actually sets a new low.
The characters are drawn in absurdly basic types, showing no shades of subtlety whatsoever. Luke the Texan is almost literally a cowboy, right down to his "Yee-haw!" exclamation. Gwen is a head-to-toe Atlanta Braves fan, a God-fearing country hick with a rebel yell (I'm not making this up!). Rebecca is the intellectually and morally superior type, accustomed to winning every battle, and her awestruck fan is McGee the historian (a WHAT?), a nerdy bookworm and token outcast. Finally, the commander and Right Stuff guy, Townsend, feels the need to wear a leather pilot's jacket and peaked hat while putting in the stick time! How could these people possibly get chosen for history's first flight to the red planet? It is simply some of the most cartoonish characterization I've ever read in any supposedly serious novel. And I thought Bova was bad. The plot is even worse. It has so many holes and it's so driven by cliches that I simply had to give up looking for any substance. Every obligatory plot device in the handbook is thrown at us in the interest of furthering the story -- and moving the story along is all it's there for -- intrigue, personal conflict, conspiracy, politics, despair, love interests, murderous rage, hairy scrapes, life-and-death cliffhangers, good guys and bad guys, you name it. I found myself shaking my head at almost every page. All the novel has to offer are extremes. It's an old-fashioned pot-boiler, setting the scenes, throwing in conflict and resolving them, over and over again. All we need now is for a villain to be unmasked in a Scooby Doo ending. Incredibly, the novel's third major failure is that Zubrin, a trained engineer, doesn't even include much hard science here (and whenever he does, they're usually the best parts of the book). We never find out why the crew marks days by the terrestrial calendar rather than with sols (martian days), and we never get a genuine feeling of the crew's physical distance from earth. We don't find out many details of how the mission actually got to Mars. We get nothing more than a thumbnail sketch of mission control, and we don't see any of the program's background. There simply isn't much for the reader to chew on besides the soap opera. This should have been the guts of his earlier book, THE CASE FOR MARS, set in motion in novel form. Instead, the adventure of going to Mars takes a back seat to the melodrama, so we have the equivalent of 'Survivor: Mars Outpost.' Now I know why Zubrin never addressed the human factors issue in his earlier book -- it's because it just doesn't matter enough to him. Don't be fooled into thinking this is "hard sci-fi." It isn't. It is strictly old school -- and I mean very old. Zubrin must have watered down the writing to try to appeal to as wide an audience as possible, but instead, he came up with a "young adults" Mars novel that manages to insult everyone's intelligence. Considering its source, FIRST LANDING is a major disappointment, and I think it's so bad that it actually undermines his non-fiction. Read FIRST LANDING only if you're interested in finding out how not to write a good science fiction novel. It may be appropriate reading for the beach, but not for the armchair adventurer.
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
The science may be good, but the story's a dud,
By
This review is from: First Landing (Hardcover)
Author Robert Zubrin obviously has great scientific credentials. He must be brilliant. His non-fiction book, A Case for Mars, added valuable insight and understanding to the body of thought on this subject and generated kudos from the likes of Buzz Aldrin, Carl Sagan, and the revered Arthur C. Clarke.Unfortunately, however, this novel about man's first voyage to the red planet is idiotic. It supposes that five incompatible personalities travel to Mars for a years-long mission, about which they have no clear sense of what they're supposed to accomplish. Laughably, having arrived, they can't agree on why they're there, as if NASA sent them with simply"take a look around and let us know." Even the earthbound scientists directing the mission are yet arguing about what they should be about on the martian surface. Then there's a rediculous scenario about a phony "expert" riling up the entire country with the idea that the crew, having been contaminated, shouldn't be allowed to return to earth, as if NASA hadn't considered beforehand what exposure to the martian envoirnment might entail. I gave it a good try, but halfway through the book I could suspend my disbelief no longer; NASA just couldn't be that inept. This story appears to be the result of someone saying, "You know so much about this stuff; you ought to write a novel," and our scientific and technological genius rising to his level of incompetence. So, in my opinion, this book is a waste of time. A successful science fiction novel must, I believe, not only have good, or at least feasible, science, but also believable characters and a story line that makes sense. Zubrin's characters are believable as people, I suppose, but not in this nonsensical scenario. Were Arther C. Clarke or Orson Scott Card to write a similar tale, there would surely be no suspension of disbelief problems nor confusion about who the reader would be pulling for.. Come to think of it, they already have!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|