First Nations? Second Thoughts [Paperback]

Tom Flanagan (Author), Thomas Flanagan (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: April 2000

Controversial and thought-provoking, Tom Flanagan's "First Nations? Second Thoughts" dissects the prevailing orthodoxy that determines public policy towards Canada's Aboriginal peoples. Flanagan argues that this orthodoxy enriches and empowers a small elite of activists, politicians, administrators, middlemen, and well-connected entrepreneurs, while bringing further misery to the very people it is supposed to help. Over the last thirty years Canadian policy on Aboriginal issues has come to be dominated by an ideology that sees Aboriginal peoples as 'nations' entitled to specific rights. Indians and Inuit now enjoy a cornucopia of legal privileges, including rights to self-government beyond federal and provincial jurisdiction, immunity from taxation, court decisions reopening treaty issues settled long ago, the right to hunt and fish without legal limits, and free housing, education, and medical care as well as other economic benefits.Underpinning these privileges is what Flanagan describes as Aboriginal orthodoxy - a set of beliefs that hold that prior residence in North America is an entitlement to special treatment; that Aboriginal peoples are part of sovereign nations endowed with an inherent right to self-government; that Aboriginals must have collective rather than individual property rights; that all treaties must be renegotiated on a 'nation-to-nation' basis; and, that Native people should be encouraged to build prosperous 'Aboriginal economies' through money, land, and natural resources transferred from other Canadians. In "First Nations? Second Thoughts" Flanagan combines conceptual analysis with historical and empirical information to show that the Aboriginal orthodoxy is both unworkable and ultimately destructive to the people it is supposed to help.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Flanagan's arguments are, without question, the most thoughtful and comprehensive of the critiques of aboriginal policy that have been offered so far ... His views are controversial and, whether or not you agree with him, there is a clear need for his arguments to be publicly available and debated." Alan Cairns, Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia

About the Author

Product Details

• Paperback: 216 pages
• Publisher: McGill-Queen's University Press (April 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0773520708
• ISBN-13: 978-0773520707
• Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 14.7 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,902,268 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Illuminating view of flawed Indian agenda, August 6, 2000

By 

Scott E. Peterman (Oneida, NY USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: First Nations? Second Thoughts (Paperback)

Indian tribal governments in both Canada and the United States will not like, but should read Tom Flanagan's latest book, "First Nations? Second Thoughts;" the cold objective truth is sometimes a hard pill to swallow. While not liking Mr. Flanagan's analysis of the issues, they will find it very difficult to dispute his conclusions.

In a dispassionate and scholarly work, using an impressive array of references, Flanagan covers all of the important aboriginal issues, revealing the flaws in everything from the "We Were Here First" argument to "Aboriginal Sovereignty."

A twenty page chapter on "Civilization" provides a clear and concise analysis of what civilization is, and how the "civilization gap" between the Indian tribes of North America and the Europeans inevitably changed tribal life forever. Flanagan concludes that the displacement of hunter-gatherers by agricultural peoples and the extension of rule by organized states over stateless societies are processes that "are so prominent in human history that it seems almost beside the point to raise questions about morality." Moreover, the processes were occurring in the Americas before the Europeans arrived. Flanagan writes, "Fortified with increased food production from horticulture, the Iroquois were pushing hard against their Huron and Algonquian neighbours when the French and English arrived. Further south, the Aztecs and Incas were forcibly incorporating neighbouring peoples into their civilized and growing empires."

The book primarily covers Canadian aboriginal issues, but the issues, if not identical, are very similar to those in the United States. Flanagan does underestimate the seriousness of the threat of so-called "sovereign Indian nations" in the United States, and claims that there is no important separatist movement in the United States using sovereignty as a catchword. Tribal governments continue to press for more sovereignty, greater self-determination (at the expense of the American taxpayers), and more land via an increasing number of land claims. With the advent of Indian casino monopolies, the financial resources of the tribes will only increase the level of these threats.

Readers that have read Melvin H. Smith's book, "Our Home Or Native Land?" will be interested in and enjoy Flanagan's book. "First Nations? Second Thoughts" is easy to read, easy to understand...

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Different but Interesting, January 16, 2002

By 

Robert K. Milligan (Winnipeg, MB, Canada) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: First Nations? Second Thoughts (Hardcover)

"First Nations Second Thoughts" provides a different but interesting critique of the contemporary aboriginal rights movement in Canada. Taking issue with the report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples author Tom Flanagan maintains that what he calls the "aboriginal orthodoxy" (aboriginal leaders, non-aboriginal politicians, among others) have misled ordinary aboriginal people. By patronizing their traditional cultures and trying to find constitutional means to perhaps fossilize them aboriginal peoples, at the same time, are given sweet words but no improvements to their daily lives. Flanagan challenges assumptions that aboriginal peoples ,collectively prefer their traditional ways and consequent isolation to integration into modern Western society. His discussion is interesting except that he tends to set his own premises concerning the "aboriginal orthodoxy" rather than commenting on statements made by real people involved. He also neglects aboriginal values such as co-operation and consensus which have much to offer modern Western society. Nevertheless I reccommend "First Nations Second Thoughts as a perspective to those who have doubts about the aboriginal rights movement and as a challenge to those who defend it.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Very Politically Incorrect. But a Must Read!, December 13, 2003

By 

Christopher Linstead - See all my reviews

This review is from: First Nations? Second Thoughts (Paperback)

Flanagan closely scutenizes mainstream assumptions in this assessment of Canadian aboriginal policy. He suggests that the concept of aboriginal collective indigeneuous often neglects the fact that aboriginals arrived in numerous immigration waves over a period spanning several thousand years. However, the Indian Act, compacts most of these groups together when distributing legal provisions. Flanagan also points out that French Canadians in what is now Quebec, established permanent settlements here long before the British, but we continue refuse to even grant them "special status," let alone referring to them as sovereign nations. The author attributes this double standard to an underlying racist federal policy which gives discriminatory treatment to Quebec for the political interests of Ottawa. Flanagan also points out that Louis Riel, despite being rewritten as a hero of the Metis culture and rights first and last, was really an advocate of the global Conquest of French Catholicism. This is evident with the way he treated white French Canadian catholics with much greater affinity than Metis protestants who he considered to be merely distant cousins. This point is further emphasized in history by the outrage in Quebec among Riel's hanging.
Again, a must read which questions our entire approach to aboriginal policy in Canada.