The First Edition of the New Testament [Hardcover]

David Trobisch (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 0195112407 | ISBN-13: 978-0195112405 | Publication Date: December 14, 2000 | Edition: 2000

This groundbreaking book argues that the New Testament is not the product of a centuries-long process of development. Its history, Trobisch finds, is the history of a book--an all Greek Christian bible--published as early as the second century C.E. and intended by its editors to be read as a whole. Trobisch claims that this bible achieved wide circulation and formed the basis of all surviving manuscripts of the New Testament.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Dr. Trobisch has produced a thought-provoking and significant study that will surely challenge the traditional understanding of the formation of the canon....The First Edition of the New Testament could have relevance for years to come."--Faith & Mission

About the Author

David Trobisch is at Bangor Theological Seminary.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 175 pages
• Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA; 2000 edition (December 14, 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0195112407
• ISBN-13: 978-0195112405
• Product Dimensions: 8.6 x 5.6 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #833,877 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

25 of 27 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Eye-opening and persuasive!, August 30, 2002

By 

Charles S. Houser (Binghamton, NY) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The First Edition of the New Testament (Hardcover)

You don't need to know New Testament Greek to follow Trobisch's arguments. Although an astute reader and clever interpreter of textual evidence, Trobisch spares us the usual myopia and nit picking textual critics like to heap upon their readers. He avoids discussions of authorial authenticity that so easily put many people on the defensive. Instead, he helps the reader appreciate larger redactional issues of how the different components of the New Testament relate to one another. By making comparisons to familiar modern publishing practices, Trobisch makes his arguments easily accessible to the modern reader (for example, he shows how the decisions publishers and editors make and the conventions they establish can affect the final form of the text as much, perhaps, as those of the authors.) There's much here I'll want to re-examine when I've done more reading in this area, but on my first read-through I found Trobisch's thesis exciting and refreshing. This book has certainly changed the way I'll be reading the New Testament from now on.

Trobisch's aim was "to describe the history of the Canonial Edition by analyzing the oldest existing copies and tracing the edition back to the time and place of first publication. With this method, Greek manuscripts became more important witnesses than the lists of canonical writings, quotes from biblical literature, and debates about the authenticity of certain writings, translations, and so on." (p. 37) By doing this, Trobisch is able to draw some interesting conclusions: (1) that the editors of the New Testament took great care in naming the different sections of the Bible, and in doing so validated, rather than minimized, the place of the Old Testament in the Christian Bible, (2) that the sequence of the four Gospels as we have it today is a tradition of long-standing, and one that makes good sense even though it means separating Luke from Acts (his explanation of the role of John 21 in this regard is truly fascinating, p. 96ff), (3) that the "first edition" of the New Testament would have positioned the General Letters after Acts and before the Letters of Paul (the logic being, in part, that the first half of Acts introduces the reader to Peter, John and James, and it is only in the second part that Acts starts to focus on the missionary efforts of Paul), (4) that the editors used an elegant system of internal cross referencing to validate both the authority of the leaders in Jerusalem and of Paul (this seeming harmony serving as a unified barrier against Marcionite error), and (5)that the editors managed to straddle the potentially devisive issue of the date upon which Easter should be celebrated by including both the Synoptic and Johannine traditions. Just to name a few! And don't skip the fascinating discussion of the codex ("bound book") v. the scroll in the establishment of the Canonical Edition of the Bible (p. 69-77).

I must admit the flow of Trobisch's argument was so engrossing that I never really examined the endnotes. But they're there and they're detailed. The bibliography is substantial, too (but be warned, it includes a high percentage of German works).

This book is truly worth the investment (both in money and in the time you'll spend digging into it). Treat yourself!

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A fascinating book, September 27, 2003

By 

Kurt A. Johnson (North-Central Illinois, USA) - See all my reviews
(HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)    (VINE VOICE)    (TOP 100 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: The First Edition of the New Testament (Hardcover)

In this fascinating book, Professor David Trobisch of the University of Heidelberg details his examination of the early Bible manuscripts, and his conclusion that during the second century A.D., that a group of editors produced a Bible that became the archetype for all subsequent Bibles, though the original "Canonical Edition" has been forgotten. This overturns decades of belief that the New Testament was compiled haphazardly over a long period of time, in different locations, and had to be harmonized at a later date.

Through examinations of the earliest of Bible manuscripts, the author takes you on a fascinating tour of what this Canonical Edition contained, how it was organized, and how it was supposed to be read. I must say that that I found this book to be absolutely fascinating. The author makes a good argument supporting his conclusion, and gives the reader a good idea of what this original Bible must have looked like. My one and only complaint against this book is that the author does not examine who these editors were.

But, that said, this is a great book, a fascinating book that I highly recommend. I also highly recommend David Trobisch's subsequent book, Paul's Letter Collection.

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Remarkable scholarship with profound implications, October 6, 2003

By A Customer

This review is from: The First Edition of the New Testament (Hardcover)

This is a startling book, and well worth a detailed read. If Trobisch is right in his conclusions about an early edition of the New and Old Testament, we have much to investigate in this new light. I was persuaded by his carefully reasoned and extremely well documented arguments. And I find the material intensely exciting. What more can Trobisch point out to us, using only the text of scripture itself as he has done here? I can't wait to see response from the academic community to this excellent and compelling work. Anne Rice, New Orleans, La.