|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
25 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very good for the budding scholar or the merely curious alike,
By noeton (Pennsylvania) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and Sophists (Oxford World's Classics) (Paperback)
There are few widely-available compendiums to choose from of the Pre-Socratics that include the Sophists, who are crucial for understanding Plato. Penguin has another that's not bad. This one is slightly better and more complete, hence if you want one and only one this is the way to go. Together they are complementary but in many ways redundant unless you want to compare translations.
This book provides a plethora of the available fragments from all the important figures of the age, though it is not entirely exhaustive. Together with fine standard view introductions which ably assist the reader in navigating these complex and diverse materials, one effectively cannot go wrong in purchasing this useful, tidy, and cheap but sturdy little book (in this way its a good example of the Oxford World Classics series, and again, on this front they have the edge on Penguin, who seems to prefer to save a buck in printing costs). To get more of this material one must to go to the expensive dual-language Loeb series' and/or an Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers, as well as many other secondaries. For a single, solid starting place, W.K.C. Guthrie's large, pricey, multi-volume history of Ancient Greek Philosophy is quite good and certainly the standard in handy reference works concerning this period - especially volumes I-III (III is mostly available now in the form of two books, simply called "Socrates" and "The Sophists".) His Plato books are fairly good, but mostly as starting points and reference guides to the dialogues, and the Aristotle volume is honestly not worth the money unless you can don't mind springing for a decent general, though not strictly light, intro or are consummately scouring secondary source material).
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Handy Reference and Introduction,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and Sophists (Oxford World's Classics) (Paperback)
This is a handy collection of the fragmentary works of the men who wondered about the nature of things and the role of man prior to Socrates. For each Waterfield presents the result of his research and study by providing a brief overview of what the twenty thinkers/writers wrote and/or possibly meant by their writings. Following this brief explanation is a discussion of each of their surviving fragments.
As such, I look at this volume as a handy resource of expert opinion on the early philosophers. Beyond his exposition, Waterfield also provides a helpful reference of the timeline of each starting with Thales in 580 BC and concluding with Planudes in 1320 AD, and a most excellent bibliography on each thinker for possible further investigatory work by the reader. I would purchase this as a good introduction to those unfamiliar with these men and as a reference manual. I would not recommend it as a book to read cover-to-cover. Yet Waterfield's learned thirty three page Introduction should not be overlooked; it may be worth the purchase price by itself. In it he provides some interesting and educated insights, particularly his discussion of "mythos" and "logos." |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and Sophists (Oxford World's Classics) by Robin Waterfield (Paperback - November 30, 2000)
Used & New from: $0.01
| ||