66 of 77 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
(2.5 stars) Why this isn't a romantic book, and why it drove me crazy, February 3, 2007
This review is from: The First Princess of Wales: A Novel (Paperback)
Ever since reading in another novel that she was married at 12 and then became a bigamist at 13, I've been interested in Joan of Kent, so naturally when I heard about this book I pre-ordered it. As it turned out, I need not have been so enthusiastic-this is really nothing more than a cheesy romance novel that really, even isn't even a romance novel since the male lead (Edward the Black Knight, Prince of Wales, never became king) insists throughout the book on practically raping the female lead (Joan of Kent).
The back cover of this book says that Joan, in this novel, is plotting to get even with the King of England, Edward III, for her father's death, which he failed to prevent and may have encouraged (her dad was hung for treason which he was not guilty of). I would just like to say that this is not a major plot point, in fact, this is a thought, not a plan, or a plot, that Joan has, for a little while. It is a not a major part of the book. The vast majority of the book is spent with Joan or Edward moping about in various places because they aren't together. That really is the book. Really, that's it, except for two war scenes and one peasant uprising (which was interesting.)
This is supposed to be a romance, but as a wise woman once wrote, it is not a romance novel in any way if the romance in question involves rape. And in the novel there are just too many references too Edward wanting to "tame" Joan or Edward getting what he wanted from Joan whether or not she was willing to give it to him. Ultimately she does always capitulate, and I am aware that Edward's attitude is completely normal for the age he lived in, but this is a novel that is supposed to be romantic to contemporary readers and I find it offensive the author considers Edwards's actions to be romantic.
And Joan! She is such a pain! Every time she actually made a choice and stuck to it some man, usually Edward, would ride by and talk her out of it, or just kiss her, and all of her convictions would melt away. I mean lady, grow a backbone! On top of this the book gives no feel for the time period at all. I mean none. For a book that does read "Katherine" by Anya Seton.
The other thing in this book that bothered me was Joan's age. In real life Joan was 2 years older than Edward. In this book, which starts when Joan goes to court, no mention is made of her age, but it is implied that she has reached puberty. At court where we meet Edward it is implied by his living situation (alone with buddies) and sexual actions (whores and all!) that he is at the youngest a middle teenager. Yet later we learn Edward and Joan were born about the same time. Then, at Joan's wedding, we learn that her older brother John, who is five years older, is 20, and it has been five years since she went to court. This makes her fifteen, meaning she was ten when she went to court and Edward started to try to seduce her (ick!) This number also works well with the real life numbers of married first at 12, and so on. But two and a half years later her brother John's age is still listed as being 20! I know this isn't a big deal but it just drove me nuts and kept me from enjoying the rest of the book-not that this book has much to enjoy.
What I did like was that Princess Isabella in this book wasn't an old, unattractive, hag who some young man who forced to marry, she was a beautiful woman who waited for the right man, he just happened to be ten years younger.
So for the annoying characters, the plot that consists of moping around all of England and some of France, a prince who doesn't care about consent and some seriously annoying time discrepancies, this book gets 2.5 stars from me. I can't say I recommend it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Readable Despite Its Extreme Faults, March 10, 2007
This review is from: The First Princess of Wales: A Novel (Paperback)
Aside from the shallow, fatuous characterizations, the gratuitous borderline-rape sex scenes, the anachronistic dialogue, and the utter lack of historical verity it was not a bad read. If you are looking for a realistic depiction of Joan of Kent or fourteenth century England, you will be sorely disapointed.
Ms. Harper was unable to even accurately portray Joan's honours and dignities, refering to her as the "Duchess of Kent" and stating that her husband, Thomas Holland, did not assume the titles by her right. The Holland-Salisbury case and the consequeseces of the death of Edmund of Woodstock are grossly distorted. The historical continuity is preposterously inaccurate, as are the names and relative ages of Joan's siblings and children.
As for the unwarranted copulation and the vapid, desultory female characters, anyone who has previously read Ms. Harper's work will not be surprised. Despite all of these severe flaws, I found this book easy to read and not unenjoyable. Consider it as a beach read or on a commute.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
"For I have loved thee from the start.", January 2, 2007
This review is from: The First Princess of Wales: A Novel (Paperback)
Formerly published as "Sweet Passion's Pain", this historical novel takes place in the mid-fourteenth century, as Joan of Kent meets her destiny in the court of Edward III. Learning belatedly of her father's death at the very hands of the Plantagenet's who now control her future, Joan is caught in a web of palace intrigue and her own confused emotions. Unwittingly she falls in love with Edward, Prince of Wales; over the next few years she resists the ties that the prince so readily accepts, realizing she will never be accepted as his wife. In any case, Edward III's Queen Philippa has her own ideas, sensing the attraction between Joan and her handsome son, marrying Joan off quickly to a Knight of the Garter whose estates are in the border lands of France.
At times hopelessly in love with the prince and unable to resist his skillful seduction, Joan vacillates between helpless infatuation with Edward and rage at the disservice to her family, periodically embarking on missions of revenge that unerringly fail to yield the desired results. These small rebellions always backfire and more often than not she is saved from her own impetuous nature by the prince. Yet Joan persists, traveling dangerous terrain to confront her heart's tormentor, even in the midst of war and peasant uprising that puts them both at great risk. Considering the consequences of these foolish adventures, Edward is the essence of patience, constantly intervening on Joan's behalf.
Although Joan of Kent begins her quest for parity as a very young woman, she persists into adulthood, making the same foolish decisions over and over until she accepts the inevitability of her fate, bound to the Prince of Wales.
The historical narrative gives perspective to the constant threat of war with France during this tumultuous era, as England struggles for dominance in Europe, Joan but a peripheral figure in history's great unfolding drama. Yet Joan claims her place in the royal family line, finally at the side of her beloved as his wife, the first Princess of Wales. Filled with treachery, family betrayals, court intrigue, troubadours, chivalry and the drama of forbidden love, Joan's future is secured by a determined prince who has more faith in their future than she. Luan Gaines/2006.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
