While fads such as hula hoops or streaking are usually dismissed as silly enthusiasms, trends in institutions such as education, business, medicine, science, and criminal justice are often taken seriously, even though their popularity and usefulness is sometimes short-lived. Institutional fads such as open classrooms, quality circles, and multiple personality disorder are constantly making the rounds, promising astonishing new developments--novel ways of teaching reading or arithmetic, better methods of managing businesses, or improved treatments for disease. Some of these trends prove to be lasting innovations, but others--after absorbing extraordinary amounts of time and money--are abandoned and forgotten, soon to be replaced by other new schemes. In this pithy, intriguing, and often humorous book, Joel Best--author of the acclaimed Damned Lies and Statistics--explores the range of institutional fads, analyzes the features of our culture that foster them, and identifies the major stages of the fad cycle--emerging, surging, and purging. Deconstructing the ways that this system plays into our notions of reinvention, progress, and perfectibility, Flavors of the Month examines the causes and consequences of fads and suggests ways of fad-proofing our institutions.
Flavor of the Month: Why Smart People Fall for Fads
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
| |||||||||||||||
Browse our Bookshelf Favorites store for big savings on popular fiction, nonfiction, children's books, and more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Sociologist Best (Damned Lies and Statistics) dissects the dangerous hula hoops of business, medicine, science and education in this light exposition on institutional fads. According to Best, American attitudes toward progress (colored by optimism, competitiveness, a belief in positive change and a fear of being seen as old-fashioned) serve as kindling to the fire of the next big cure, technological revolution, business management secret or teaching method. Best delineates stages of the fad life-cycle ("emerging," "surging," then finally "purging") and identifies conditions and players essential to creating a successful fad (a problem needs a solution, which is then proposed by originators and pushed by promoters), and though he makes an intuitive and immensely readable case, his book suffers from a dearth of hard data and case studies (the hypothetical "Dr. Michael" and "Professor Alice" used to illustrate Best's points feel contrived and simple). Similarly, his five rules for "fad-proofing" will work well for an individual, but those who adhere to his principles and swim against the tide in a large organization may find themselves reading this book in the soup line.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Best is author of Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists (2001) and several other books that take a fresh look at social trends. Although the title might suggest a whimsical look at the pop-culture fads that we all love to make fun of, this book focuses on a much lesser- but more insidious version: the institutional fad. Institutional fads occur in business, education, government, and medicine whenever normally rational people embrace novel solutions just because they are the latest, greatest thing. Since the definition of a fad is something that catches on and then quickly fades away, these passing solutions waste a lot of resources and can even leave damage in their wake. Some institutional fads that may not be all they were cracked up to be include multiple-personality-disorder diagnoses, business management systems such as Six Sigma, and the No Child Left Behind program. Best examines the life cycle and dynamics of fads and suggests some basic adages for becoming "fad-proof," such as "remember last time." David Siegfried
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? |
More About the Author
Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Flavor of the Month is a 162 page essay/novel about institutional fads: why they exist, their different stages, and then a dissection on their pros and cons.
Although most of the observations are fairly obvious (institutional fads happen in cycles, etc) the information is well organized and presented. The major drawback to the book is that Best relies solely on "what if" stories. He creates fictional characters and places them in fictional situations to demonstrate how an institutional fad could begin, spread, and then fade away. The information would have been a lot more compelling if he were actually dealing with facts.
The book includes several copies of email forwards and other such jokes that you have probably seen repeatedly, and they get a little old, but add length to the book, which is their point I think.
I found Flavor of the Month easy to get through fairly quickly, but I'm not sure that I came away any more knowledgeable than before I opened the book. We all know that institutional fads happened, and I would rather have seen more examples of them happening in real life than a brief example of how they "could" effect a business.
Although most of the observations are fairly obvious (institutional fads happen in cycles, etc) the information is well organized and presented. The major drawback to the book is that Best relies solely on "what if" stories. He creates fictional characters and places them in fictional situations to demonstrate how an institutional fad could begin, spread, and then fade away. The information would have been a lot more compelling if he were actually dealing with facts.
The book includes several copies of email forwards and other such jokes that you have probably seen repeatedly, and they get a little old, but add length to the book, which is their point I think.
I found Flavor of the Month easy to get through fairly quickly, but I'm not sure that I came away any more knowledgeable than before I opened the book. We all know that institutional fads happened, and I would rather have seen more examples of them happening in real life than a brief example of how they "could" effect a business.
23 of 30 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I had read one of his previous books and thought it was okay. I was expecting this to have some entertaining examples of smart people falling for intellectual fads and some insights as to how that happens. Unfortunately, no such luck. All of the examples are ones that are widely known and there is really no insightful analysis. The book is quite short - all of the interesting content would barely fill a New Yorker article - and one gets the impression that this was just put together over a few weekends. I would have to say that the content is uniformly at the junior high school level. Save your money, no entertainment or enlightenment here.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Joel Best's "Flavor of the Month" illustrates, in some sense, the anatomy of institutional fads. Fads, Best writes, go through three notable stages: emerging, surging, and purging. Best devotes a chapter to each of these three 'periods' in the life cycle of a fad. Best also devotes a chapter exploring what he says are the spiral-like dynamics of trends (rather than the traditional pendullum or circular model).
One of Best's key insights, which guides his entire analysis, is the refusal to see fad-adoption as irreational. Instead of seeing the adopting and institution of fads as an "irratioanl exhuberance" (to quote Greenspan), Best attempts to explain the phenomenon as rational. First, he suggests, US culture (and many first world cultures) place prime value on change and "progress." Thus, there is always incentive to correct percieved imperfections and to "think outside the box" rather than remain static. Once the new idea comes along that promises to correct management, education, or other problems, the fad develops a kind of inertia: if those at the top sing its praises, those below experience pressure to get on board, and once they are on board, no one wants to be a "laggard." By the time studies come along showing the ineffectiveness of the fad, so much money may have been invested that there is little incentive to quit, but when enthusiasm weigns, it is generally done quickly and as quietly as possible.
Like other reviewers, my biggest problem with this book is that Best provides very few examples to support his points. It is one thing to describe how fad innovators use the rhetoric of change to get people to buy in, but it is quite another to say "and here are examples of what I mean." Best never does this latter part (talking only briefly about two concrete fads: Quality Management and DARE). Because of this, his book appears more like social theory than sociology proper. It seems to be more speculation than research-supported analysis.
Other than that, the book was mildly interesting. Most of the things Best tells us are things those of us who've been in the middle of fads (I was a teacher) already know. What I wanted was to read examples of how different fads actually worked. Since Best does not give those concrete descriptions in this book, I can only give it three stars. The thoughts are interesting, but the follow-through and support was simply non-existent.
One of Best's key insights, which guides his entire analysis, is the refusal to see fad-adoption as irreational. Instead of seeing the adopting and institution of fads as an "irratioanl exhuberance" (to quote Greenspan), Best attempts to explain the phenomenon as rational. First, he suggests, US culture (and many first world cultures) place prime value on change and "progress." Thus, there is always incentive to correct percieved imperfections and to "think outside the box" rather than remain static. Once the new idea comes along that promises to correct management, education, or other problems, the fad develops a kind of inertia: if those at the top sing its praises, those below experience pressure to get on board, and once they are on board, no one wants to be a "laggard." By the time studies come along showing the ineffectiveness of the fad, so much money may have been invested that there is little incentive to quit, but when enthusiasm weigns, it is generally done quickly and as quietly as possible.
Like other reviewers, my biggest problem with this book is that Best provides very few examples to support his points. It is one thing to describe how fad innovators use the rhetoric of change to get people to buy in, but it is quite another to say "and here are examples of what I mean." Best never does this latter part (talking only briefly about two concrete fads: Quality Management and DARE). Because of this, his book appears more like social theory than sociology proper. It seems to be more speculation than research-supported analysis.
Other than that, the book was mildly interesting. Most of the things Best tells us are things those of us who've been in the middle of fads (I was a teacher) already know. What I wanted was to read examples of how different fads actually worked. Since Best does not give those concrete descriptions in this book, I can only give it three stars. The thoughts are interesting, but the follow-through and support was simply non-existent.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
between three and four stars
as someone has already written "fairly obvious but well organized." I enjoyed it - a readable excursion into the world of fads, and for comparison, non-fads. Read more
Published on August 18, 2009 by Bruce_in_LA
5.0 out of 5 stars
lazyreaders.com book club selection for April 2006
So what if this book just came out, and I tend to always read books that are sent to me from publishers for free? Read more
Published on June 26, 2006 by Danny Brassell
