Customer Reviews

Flesh: Architectural Probes

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(1)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

This book is neither obtuse nor superficial. It does not speak of architecture with a Capital A, prognosticating the urban condition, nor is it a manifesto for clarity. It is an intentionally sensual book, and that is one of many caveats in the architectural theory world. One can no longer speak of independent arts anymore in the world of globalized architectural practice, product and philosopy. This book introduces the conceptualization of the human body and haptic experiences, as Juhani Pallaasma would say, through the mind of Georges Teyssot, a critical historiographer and accomplished author who traces the nomad thought of the concept of architecture+flesh (body) through to its core. It might be more theatrical or improvisational that the autocratic, stone-cold rabble rouser of architecture might prefer, but that is the point.

From the pretentious title to the closing footnotes, Diller and Scofidio go to great lengths to make their architecture seem more complex than it is. Their pseudo-intellectual inquiries may sound impressive to students, but do not stand up to sophisticate scrutiny. There is nothing useful or intelligent in this striving but empty volume.

Love the Title Provocative & Brilliant; especialy enligtening to those fascinated by Diller & Scofidio's body of work; if you want to gain insight as to what drives Diller and Scofidio's processes, it's a must read.....