Customer Reviews


3 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The textbook I wished I had 12 years ago
One reviewer said this book wasn't right for US readers. I can understand this: I went to a UK university, did flight mechanics as a 2nd year undergrad and got mired in thousands of symbols for things.

The only books available to us back in 1995-6 were the excellent Etkin and the superb Stevens & Lewis... BUT both were expensive, used totally different...
Published on April 15, 2008 by andy204

versus
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Wrong book for the US market
This book itself is okay. But it's not the right book for the US market. This is the first time my professor used this book, he thought it could be an improvement. But he gave up using it completely after a month into the course.

Some of the reference parameters are quite different from US standards, since the author is British. If you are a self-learner in...
Published on April 1, 2008 by K. Hinkleman


Most Helpful First | Newest First

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The textbook I wished I had 12 years ago, April 15, 2008
By 
andy204 (Munich, Germany) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Flight Dynamics Principles, Second Edition: A Linear Systems Approach to Aircraft Stability and Control (Elsevier Aerospace Engineering) (Hardcover)
One reviewer said this book wasn't right for US readers. I can understand this: I went to a UK university, did flight mechanics as a 2nd year undergrad and got mired in thousands of symbols for things.

The only books available to us back in 1995-6 were the excellent Etkin and the superb Stevens & Lewis... BUT both were expensive, used totally different symbology and conventions, and ft / lbs / secs. as units too (we used the SI system). This cost us a lot of time and effort - flight mechanics is about understanding aircraft, not about translating symbols between lecture notes and textbooks. It wasn't helped by the fact that we had a flight dynamics lecturer who neither liked nor understood what he was teaching (he told us!).

But a year or two later, this book came out and it was exactly what we should have used. The book used the same notation as our (British) lecturer had done. Better still, there were clear, step-by-step explanations, no nasty surprises, plenty of worked examples, no cop-outs like 'we intuitively see that...' The writing is clear and simple, no matter which system of symbols you're used to. If you're USA-based, you might be better suited to using Etkin, but if you work in the UK system, buy this book ! ! !
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars Not bad., June 29, 2011
By 
Calvin Walker (Columbus, MS USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Flight Dynamics Principles, Second Edition: A Linear Systems Approach to Aircraft Stability and Control (Elsevier Aerospace Engineering) (Hardcover)
Overall, the book isn't bad. Yes, it is written for mostly a British audience but the concepts and procedures are still the same. I would recommend this book to anyone wishing to know more about aircraft flight dynamics.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Wrong book for the US market, April 1, 2008
This review is from: Flight Dynamics Principles, Second Edition: A Linear Systems Approach to Aircraft Stability and Control (Elsevier Aerospace Engineering) (Hardcover)
This book itself is okay. But it's not the right book for the US market. This is the first time my professor used this book, he thought it could be an improvement. But he gave up using it completely after a month into the course.

Some of the reference parameters are quite different from US standards, since the author is British. If you are a self-learner in the US, DO NOT BUY THIS BOOK.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product