Flodden 1513: Scotland's greatest defeat (Campaign) [Paperback]

John Sadler (Author), Stephen Walsh (Illustrator)

Book Description

Series: Campaign | Publication Date: May 30, 2006

Osprey's examination of the Battle of Flodden, in which the Scottish and English armies clashed on 9 September 1513. The Scots were superior in terms of artillery and well-trained in the new Renaissance tactics, whereas the English deployed more traditional methods. Historically, this battle is well-known as the last in which the longbow played a role and the first in which artillery had a considerable effect. Recognized as the greatest Scottish defeat in history, it resulted in the death of Scotland's king. It plunged the country into mourning and extinguished Scotland's threat to Henry VIII's reign for the next three decades. This book examines battle, the different tactics of the opposing armies and the personalities of the commanders.

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

Highly visual guides to history's greatest conflicts, detailing the command strategies, tactics, and experiences of the opposing forces throughout each campaign, and concluding with a guide to the battlefields today.

About the Author

John Sadler is a lawyer based in Durham. He has always had an enthusiasm for medieval Scottish history and has written many books on the period including 'Scottish Battles: From Mons Graupius to Culloden' for Canongate, 'Battle for Northumbria' and 'The Battle of Harlaw 1411'. He also a keen reenactor of the period.

Product Details

• Paperback: 96 pages
• Publisher: Osprey Publishing (May 30, 2006)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1841769592
• ISBN-13: 978-1841769592
• Product Dimensions: 7.3 x 0.2 x 9.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 11.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,396,459 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars worth it for the artwork alone!, March 27, 2008

By 

Douglas E. Libert "howitt" (parkersburg wv) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Flodden 1513: Scotland's greatest defeat (Campaign) (Paperback)

I particularly liked the artwork in this Osprey work,the combat scenes are dramatic and realistic,not at all "cartoonish" as in some of these works.The Scots at Flodden decided to settle some issues with the English believing that Henry the eighth was overextended in his European campaigns. Apparently there were alot of border raids by both sides that seemed interminable and the Scots wanted to give the English a decisive defeat. The English however were to prove their power by defeating the Scots and at the same time fighting European powers on both land and sea.
This book has personality as well,the King of Scotland James the fourth comes off as a leader who literally led from the front.While some might see his bravery as wrecklessness one would have to admire his devotion to his cause.The quote,"nobly save or meanly lose" would apply here. The artwork reinforces this.At Flodden the Scots suffered more casualties than at all the previous Scottish vs. English campaigns combined.But for that "marshy dip",the English might well have been defeated by the pikes of the surging Scots.As it was the English bill triumphed.Great maps and displays of equipment.A great description of the battle without getting bogged down in the political causes of the conflict.

6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Scotland's Cannae, November 4, 2006

By 

R. A Forczyk (MD, USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Flodden 1513: Scotland's greatest defeat (Campaign) (Paperback)

Flodden 1513, #168 in Osprey's Campaign series, is an excellent case study in the effects of friction in operational warfare. Author John Sadler has written an informative and insightful narrative of the campaign that provides both sufficient detail and sober analysis. While some medieval military history suffers from a poor sources, there is sufficient material available for the author to get at the key facts without having to guess (which afflicts coverage of over campaigns, like Bosworth). The author is also very even-handed in his coverage of both the English and Scottish viewpoints, although he is perhaps a bit too forgiving of the battlefield conduct of Scottish King James IV.

In the opening sections, the author lays out how the Scottish and French made joint plans to deal with expected aggression from England's King Henry VIII in the summer of 1513. Everybody expected the main blow to fall in an English invasion of France and the French asked for a Scottish army to raid across England's northern border as a diversion. Scotland's King James IV reasoned that few English forces would be left to guard the border and that he could accomplish two strategic objectives in this campaign - namely, aiding his French ally and reclaiming several border castles that had been lost in previous warfare. Unfortunately for the Scottish, they did not reckon on England being able to raise a second army to deal with the cross-border invasion. Author John Sadler effectively describes the opening stages of the campaign, in which the Scottish army of at least 40,000 troops captured several castles before the English army of about 26,000 arrived in the vicinity. At this point, the author notes that the campaigning season would be over in another week or two and the Scots had accomplished both strategic objectives - there was therefore no reason to seek battle. Yet James IV decided to occupy a superb defensive position and awaited the approaching English army, a decision which seems perplexing and not fully explained herein. The author does suggest the kingly pride - a desire to win a battle in order to enhance his regal reputation - lies at the root of James' decision to seek battle.

As the author describes, the English took one look at the strong Scottish position and decided to outflank it in a night march (reminds me a bit of Chancellorsville, actually). The Scottish, confident of their numbers and position, failed to put out much local security or even watch the English army and were surprised the next day when the enemy started approaching them from behind. Flodden thus went from a set-piece fight to a meeting engagement, with the Scottish army scrambling to turn around and close up on the approaching English. After a brief artillery exchange - that the Scots lost - James IV ordered his three main formations to attack downhill toward the now stationary English. Although the Scottish attack initially went well on their left, the center with the King ran afoul of a small streambed that broke all cohesion. The English gradually gained the upper hand and the late arrival of their reserves precipitated a disastrous Scottish rout, with King James dying in close combat. At Flodden, the largest army even fielded by Scotland, was utterly crushed. The volume has three 2-D Maps (the Scots invasion route; the English flank march; the field of Flodden), three 3-D Maps (the armies deploy for battle; rout of English left; defeat and rout of Scottish army) and three Battle scenes by Stephen Walsh (the Scottish left early in the battle; the death of James IV; dusk on 9 September 1513).

The author tends to be a bit too excusing for James IV's behavior, noting that, "he failed as a captain, but not as a knight," and saying that the King's early participation in the ground combat was good for Scottish morale. Certainly James IV died a `heroic death' that is the stuff of legends, but his gambler's behavior was not that of a head of state or the commander-in-chief of a major army. Since Caesar's time if not before, the primary duty of a commander on the battlefield is to properly employ the reserve at a critical time, not to unnecessarily join in hand-to-hand combat like a common soldier. While James' body was already getting cold on the field, his reserve that might have made a difference was wasted and this opened the door for the catastrophic rout that followed. Suffice to say, the evidence pretty well indicts James IV as a poor operational commander, which is not redeemed by futile battlefield heroics.

This volume is an interesting study in friction in warfare. First, the Scottish attack probably would have succeeded, were it not for the unanticipated stream obstacle. Second, the Scottish adoption from Pike tactics from the French potentially gave them a big tactical edge over the English, but due to a variety of minor factors, the pike tactics were a failure. Third, the late arrival of the final English contingent was worse for the Scots than if they had been on the field from the beginning. Indeed, the battlefield friction worked far more against the Scots than the English and stole victory from them. There was at least one other factor that seemed to work against the Scots, which was the lack of a balanced force. While the English army had a cavalry reserve, light troops, archers and mobile light artillery, the Scots seemed to have no significant cavalry or archer forces and their army was primarily a huge block of infantry. John Sadler's well-written account of this military catastrophe should provide lessons that are still relevant for modern military readers.

6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Flodden 1513, June 4, 2006

By 

Spacy Bickerson (Cincinnati) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Flodden 1513: Scotland's greatest defeat (Campaign) (Paperback)

On 9 September 1513, Flodden field was the site for one of Scotland's most famous battles, often termed their "greatest defeat". The Scottish Army led by their courageous king, James IV, was strong in artillery and trained in new tactics from the Swiss doctrine, whereas the English Army they faced still favoured traditional tactics. Despite the strength of the Scots, the English men-at-arms fought ferociously. By nightfall, the field was strewn with the bodies of the Scottish nobility, and tre tragic figure of their king. This book examines the strategies of both armies and the significant effect of the weapons used, including the longbow and artillery.

John Sadler is an excellent author and Stephen Walsh a marvelous illustrator. I don't often buy the Osprey series of books but this one is just too good to pass up. Weither you are a student of Scottish or English history or just of military history this book is one to get.